Quantum Mechanics: The Basis of All Reality

Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real. If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet
" Niels Bohr

Of all the phenomena that we have discussed until now, Quantum Mechanics is the simplest reality, making it the easiest one to understand. That doesn't mean you'll accept truths it provides. The battle is not a mental one - but emotional. For more than any other phenomenon, quantum mechanics proves the existence of God. That means knowing how it works puts you in a vulnerable position - if you're wicked. Because it forces you to face up to the choices you've made in life. More than any other scientific reality, quantum mechanics exposes our inner motives behind our behaviours. It lays bare our intentions. On the news we constantly here fear mongerers parading an endless barrage of extinction level events for humans - 12 years of action or climate change will destroy us; overpopulation is killing the planet; population collapse will kill civilization; nuclear war ... etc. etc. In truth, Jehovah created the Earth and he has promised that both it and humans will exist forever:

He has founded the earth upon its established places; it will not be made to totter to time indefinite, or forever
Ps 104:5

And ...

Just a little while longer, and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace. ...
Ps 37:10,11

This is due to the simple empirical, scientifically established reason that all of Jehovah's creative works - as we have seen from the Axis of Love found in Light - are centered around the Earth! Around an INHABITED EARTH:

For this is what Jehovah says, the Creator of the heavens, the true God, the One who formed the earth, its Maker who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, but formed it to be inhabited: "I am Jehovah, and there is no one else."
Isa 45:18

It is not a difficult thing to realize that Jehovah's intentions in creating the Universe centered heavily around the Earth. The difference between first and second degree murder is intention - the premeditated planning aimed at achieving a stated goal. Genesis 1:1 shows Jehovah's plans, because it establishes that the Earth was not an afterthought, but the first object in the visible realm of the universe, the Cosmos. More than that, the five salient "apparent features" Light tells us about Initial Condition all verify that the Earth has always been - from the initial conditions down to our day - at the center of unfolding creative events throughout the universe. In fact, the reason for all the stars, was so they could "shine upon the Earth!" That establishes Jehovah's intentions towards the Earth. His loyal acts of love since then, confirm his intentions. That would include everything from sending the Christ to die for us:

For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life
Joh 3:16

... To creating all the Sweet Spots he has created, nesting them together (which you should know by now, means producing a rich or complex Sweet Spot - one with depth), and then putting us right in the middle! Then giving us dominion over all that goodness to boot! (Ps 8:4-6; Heb 2:5-9)

Jehovah is a great King. All Kings are measured by how many subjects they have. Below a certain threshold we really can't call you a king in good faith - you're a chief.

A multitude of people are a king’s majesty, but a ruler without subjects is ruined
Pr 14:28

JEHOVAH IS NOT A CHIEF! Jehovah is the most majestic of all Kings - he is the God who created the universe! Jesus clearly explained that if a man's house is pillaged by another man, the pillager is the stronger of the two; and the pillagee - the weaker:

Later he expelled a speechless demon. After the demon came out, the speechless man spoke, and the crowds were amazed. But some of them said: "He expels the demons by means of Be·el'ze·bub, the ruler of the demons." And others, to test him, began demanding a sign out of heaven from him. Knowing their thinking, he said to them: "Every kingdom divided against itself comes to ruin, and a house divided against itself falls. In the same way, if Satan is also divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say I expel the demons by means of Be·el'ze·bub. If I expel the demons by means of Be·el'ze·bub, by whom do your sons expel them? This is why they will be your judges. But if it is by means of God's finger that I expel the demons, the Kingdom of God has really overtaken you. When a strong, well-armed man guards his palace, his belongings remain secure. But when someone stronger than he is comes against him and conquers him, that man takes away all his weapons in which he was trusting, and he divides up the things he took from him
Lu 11:14-22

How can you hear the words, but miss their meaning? When Jehovah empowered Christ to expel demons during his time on Earth, it was as a proof that God is stronger than Devil and his demon hordes. How is it then, that you have come to the opposite conclusion and believe that it is Satan who is plundering God - by killing his Earthly children. Thus depopulating the planet that God created to be "inhabited." How do you reason? Is this lack of reason, not the cause behind a lack of faith? For reasoning is faith. Hence, only the unreasoning lack faith - and the knowing but wicked. God's superiority over Devil is what the principle of the resurrection is about as again highlighted by the King of Jehovah's Space Kingdom - Jesus the Christ:

Now the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came and asked him: ... Jesus said to them: "Is not this why you are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God? For when they rise from the dead, neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but they are as angels in the heavens. But concerning the dead being raised up, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the account about the thornbush, that God said to him: 'I am the God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob?' He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living. You are very much mistaken."
Mr 12:18,24-27

If a king who has a few subjects is ruined, how much more so a king whose subjects are all dead? Would that not spell total defeat? That is why, in Isaiah 45:18 quoted earlier, Jehovah ties his ability to ensure the Earth continues INHABITED, to his GODSHIP! The two are inextricably linked. If Jehovah is the true God, the Earth will always be inhabited. If the Earth is always facing extinction level events, it means Jehovah is not real. It's that simple. Your susceptibility to all the fear mongering betrays your lack of faith: or put another way - your sad lack of understanding ... of simple reasoning ability! Everything that Devil can do, Jehovah has the power to reverse it's effects, and thus "break up* the works of the Devil." (1Jo 3:8) The footnote on the phrase "break up" reads: Or "destroy." That is the value of Revelations 21:1-4!

Because all the other topics we have covered in this blog are not as fundamental to reality as Quantum Mechanics, you could always say, "Yes ... but." But Quantum Mechanics is so simple and straightforward that turning away from Jehovah after learning what it signifies and the implications thereof, cannot be interpreted as anything else but the personal exercise of your "free will" - not by other people ... but by yourself. You will not be able to lie to yourself any longer, that you "didn't know." AND THAT IS SCARY! To come face to face with a truth so fundamental you can't fool yourself into pretending you don't know what it means. Immediately, you will know both the consequences of your actions, and they fact that you have no leg to stand on - if your choice is anti-God. That's where you now are - past the point of no return:

Walk with me. Hold my hand and let me lead you. I take you on a journey and I promise I will lead you - I will lead you - until you get the full comprehension. And when you do: that's when the mission of survival becomes your every thought
" Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr

Defining the WAVE FUNCTION

I know that quantum mechanics is supposedly impossible to understand, but trust me when I say the difficulty is not in the mathematics
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #4: It's Not So Difficult! (0:24-0:31)

So irrelevant to understanding quantum mechanics is the mathematics that we will not even delve into it in our exposition. The only place it features is in discussing "entangled" particles, which we will soon define and explain. For now we concentrate on the wave function!

Defining SUPERPOSITION

If you know one thing about quantum mechanics, it's that Schrodinger's cat is both dead and alive. This is what physicists call a "superposition." But what does this really mean? And what does it have to do with entanglement?
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #2: Superposition and Entanglement (0:00-0:14)

So starts Sabine's video on the subject of quantum superposition and entanglement. It is true: anyone who has ever heard of quantum mechanics and its other-worldly dynamics hears about Schrodinger's cat as the premiere example of quantum behaviour. So how does it work. The important thing to appreciate in that our study of it is a human effort to describe things we have no direct powers to observe - the microscopic world of atoms. The fundamental building blocks of the physical realm - the Cosmos. As such, we relate to the mathematically describable relationships we discover through a mathematical tool called the Wave-Function. We cannot describe in purely particle-based fashion, nor can we explain what we detect in a purely wave-based context, because at this level of reality objects have BOTH a wave and a particle duality. For this reason the wave-function encompasses both. For instance, photons of light are a particle that are also waves. That's why we get an interference pattern when we do experiments, such as the famous double-slit experiment. Everything, then, in quantum mechanics, is described through the wave-function! It is this wave-function that we use to calculate the probabilities of measurement outcomes.

But we said the wave-function is a tool. What then is it used for? Calculating all the quantum behaviours a quantum mechanical system can perform. For these calculations we use a formula derived by the brilliant Erwin Schrodinger. His equation, his Wikipedia page says, "provides a way to calculate the wave function of a system and how it changes dynamically in time." Through the wave-function we can insights into a world we would otherwise be completely ignorant of. The insights have been staggering! One of the most important insights from the Schrodinger equation is detailed by Hossenfelder. I will quote her remarks and explain them afterwards:

If you have two solutions to the equation, then any sum of the two solutions ... is also a solution. And that is what is called a "superposition!"
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #2: Superposition and Entanglement (1:08-1:20)

That is important. It is important because it veers dramatically from everything you experience and know about the physical realm of the universe - the Cosmos. In physical life, existence is based on based on binary realities: either this OR that. That's how computers work using 1s and 0s. And upon this fundamental experience of physical reality we have built our civilizations - and our concept of reality. The law is based on such black and white evidence also. In fact, any standards based entity or organization can de distilled to such binary principles. Here I am talking of factual, and not moral judgements. Right and wrong is still wight and wrong in the quantum world. However, the empirical results from experiments in quantum mechanics tell us that that world is more complex.

The "two solutions to the equation" that Sabine speaks of can be opposites of each other. And yet, "any sum of the two solutions is also a solution." What does that mean? It means if your two solutions were "right" and "left," the additional solution of left/right is also correct. Whereas in the classical world of macro objects, that final solution would have to be binary: either left OR right - but not both! That's one important distinction between the quantum and classical worlds - and it's a property of wave-functions. Again, everything in the quantum world operates according to wave functions, as opposed to being defined as either a particle, or a wave. It is this non-binary property of quantum objects that is defined as a Superposition.

Defining ENTANGLEMENT

A consequence of superposition is the related phenomenon called Entanglement. Quantum particles can decay while maintaining "conserved quantities," such as spin, or some other variable. Because in such cases the two new particles must CONSERVE the value of the original particle - they are not independent! Let's say the original particle is described by a spin of zero. If you measure one of the new particles and you get a spin of 1, you immediately know the other particle has a spin of -1. In this way the quantity of the original spin is conserved! We represent this graphically, with two arrows pointing in opposite directions. This non-independence between two separate quantum particles is the definition of Entangled particles. Individual particle products that are related in such a way, that the sum of one or other property of their original entity - is CONSERVED!

In summary: superposition is the quantum property of being able to do two things at once, even if the two things are complete opposites of each other - like somersaulting forwards and backwards at the same time; while entanglement is the superposition of TWO SEPARATED ENTITIES THAT HAVE A CONSERVED QUANTITY(IES).

Defining DECOHERENCE

A curious property of quantum mechanics is that superpositions of macroscopic non-quantum states, like the dead and alive cat, quickly become entangled with their environment, which makes the quantum properties disappear in a process called 'decoherence.'
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #2: Superposition and Entanglement (5:17-5:32)

Decoherence is a LIMIT. A limit between the quantum and classical worlds! It is a limit that applies to all quantum phenomenon as soon as they are exposed to an outside, non-quantum environment. Detectors, humans, macroscopic objects are classified as an outside "environment."

The idea of decoherence is now to take into account that the superposition is not the only thing in our system. We prepare a state at some initial time, and then it travels to the detector. A detector is basically is basically a device that amplifies a signal. A little quantum particle comes in one end and a number comes out the other end. This necessarily means that the superposition which we want to measure interacts with many other particles - both along the way to the detector, and in the detector. This is what you want to describe with decoherence. The easiest way to describe these constant bumps that the superposition has to endure is that each bump changes the phase of the state ... by a tiny little bit.
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #5: Decoherence (5:27-6:15)

The above explanation helps us to understand what's going on more clearly. All the different states that a wave function can be in are called "phases." The ability to maintain phases is easily preserved within quantum environments, but quickly gets erased when quantum particles interact with an outside environment. It may be a little difficult to grasp all these concepts because we are still talking in abstract terms, but the only reason I'm telling you about quantum mechanics is because it holds great significance in our everyday lives. Remember the title for his page is: "Quantum Mechanics: The Basis of All Reality!" Thus, our diving into this subject is not a mental adventure of fancy. Understanding quantum mechanics holds great insight for understanding the true nature of the world - your World. It will all make sense once we learn about how and where quantum mechanics applies in everyday life. For now, just take in the information and follow along as best you can. Only once you know the natural theater for quantum effects will you be able to make perfect sense of it all!

We carry on with decoherence. Quantum particles behave in both particle like and wave like ways, thus they cannot be labeled as either just a "wave" or just a "particle." Instead, they are described by a mathematical tool called a wave function. The dynamics of such wave-functions are, in turn, calculated using Shrodinger's equation. The different states that a wave function can be in are called "phases," as with all waves. Through the Schrodinger equation, humans have come to understand that random changes to the phases of wave function destroy the wave function's ability to "cohere," to maintain self interference. This break down in the ability to self-interfere is called Decoherence!:

Of course, physicists have to have a way of documenting these dynamics. The methodology for doing so is called a density matrix. A matrix again is just a way of tracking not only where things are are in space but determining, or documenting movement from one location in the matrix to another. A deeper understanding of density matrices is completely unnecessary, unless you are actually solving Schrodinger's equation. And again - the maths is not hard, even if the symbols use can initially be confusing. I defined "density matrix" so you can follow along with Hossenfelder's next quote:

... The terminology isn't the interesting bit. The interesting bit is what has happened with the density matrix. I know this looks utterly unremarkable. It's just a matrix with one over two's on the diagonal. But what's interesting about it is that there is no wave-function that will give you this density matrix! To see this, look again at the density matrix for an arbitrary wave-function in two dimensions. Now take for example this off-diagonal entry. If this entry is zero, then one of these coefficients has to be zero. But then, one of the diagonal elements is also zero - which is not what the decohered density matrix looks like! So, the matrix that we got after decoherence no longer corresponds to wave function!
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #5: Decoherence (8:39-9:26)

You can ignore all the density matrix talk. The only relevant portion for us is fact that there are density matrices WHICH DO NOT CORRESPOND TO A WAVE FUNCTION. Put another way: they no longer exhibit quantum mechanical behaviour. Sabine concludes:

That's why we use density matrices in the first place! Every wave function gives you a density matrix. But not every density matrix gives you a wave-function. If you want to describe how a system loses coherence, you therefore need to use density matrices. What does this density matrix after decoherence describe? It describes classical probabilities! The diagonal entries tell you the probability for each of the possible measurement outcomes, like in quantum mechanics. But all the quantum-ness of the system that was in the ability of the wave function to interfere with itself have gone away - with the off-diagonal entries. So decoherence, converts quantum probabilities to classical probabilities. It therefore explains why we never observe any strange quantum behaviour in everyday life. It's because this quantum behaviour goes away very quickly with all the many interactions that every particle constantly has, whether or not you measure them
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #5: Decoherence (9:27-)

So density matrices are an analytical tool for assessing when a system has quantum properties and when it does not. The transition happens when quantum particles are exposed to a non-quantum environment. An easy rule of thumb for separating the two is size. Quantum wave functions only show themselves on the very small microscopic scale of subatomic particles in everyday life. I must stress that this does not limit quantum behaviour to that scale - for reasons you will soon learn. In any case, the rule of thumb is quantum behaviour dominates on small scales and classical mechanics on large macroscopic scales. "Large" here, denotes anything larger than atoms and their subatomic particles. But density matrices and decoherence are limited in their ability to describe reality. We will talk about that when we discuss the measurement problem. For now, we move on to defining quantum property: non-locality.

Defining Quantum NON-LOCALITY

We remember from our earlier discussion about Fotini Markopoulou's ideas surrounding the true nature of Space what "locality" signifies. It means you cannot have shortcuts through Space. You have gto actually traverse the Space in between distant locations, or neighbourhoods. The same is true in the quantum world - as you might expect:

Locality means that to get from one point to another, you somehow have to make a connection in Space between these points. You cannot suddenly disappear and reappear elsewhere. ... In quantum mechanics, it's more difficult
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #3: Non-locality (0:00-0:16)

The wrinkle that quantum mechanics introduces is the variable of superposition as defined earlier. The quirk is, the entangled particles know what the other one is doing instantly - even when they are separated by vast distances. I stress: this happens instantly! In other words faster than a signal traveling at the speed of light could be communicated. That is the non classical phenomenon scientists are at a loss to explain.

It takes time to convey a signal across Space. That was the whole argument - and correctly so - behind Fotini's ideas about Space versus wormholes. How do quantum objects "communicate" with each other, faster than a message can be sent between them? We will resolve that paradox shortly. For now, we focus on what these dynamics mean about the true nature of quantum mechanics. They are telling us that quantum phenomenon are NON-LOCAL. What does that mean? It means quantum particles somehow "communicate" with each other without the "information" traveling locally, that is, without traveling through the Space that separates them. The significance of non-local quantum behaviour is, what it means about all quantum particles: IT MEANS QUANTUM PHENOMENON ARE NOT PHYSICAL IN NATURE. That realization will feature large as we bring resolution to this issue in a little while. That is hugely significant, because quantum particles are the most fundamental building of all physical reality. This is why Niels Bohr, quoted at the beginning of this page said: "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be regarded as real!" Let that sink in. As you do, let us define what quantum non-locality is not.

What Quantum NON-Locality is NOT

To make sure we are all on the same page, let me briefly tell you what quantum non-locality is NOT. It is not deciding upfront, which of the two particles have what spin. In such a scenario when you measured the particles later, after they have been separated by vast distances: measuring the spin of one particle would instantly tell you what the spin of the other was, but not because of entanglement. It would be because you determined each spin ahead of time - in a classical; and not quantum way. Sabine gives a nice illustration, commonly invoked by physicists to distinguish between quantum non-locality and pre-determining outcomes classically:

Suppose you take a pair of shoes and put them in separate boxes. You don't know which box contains the left shoe and which the right shoe. You send one box to your friend overseas. The moment the friend opens their box, she will instantaneously know what's in your box. That seems to be very similar to the two particles with total spin zero. But it is not - and here's why. Shoes do not have quantum properties, so the question which box contained the left shoe and which the right shoe was decided already when you PACKED them. The one box travels entirely locally to your friend, while the other one stays with you. When she opens the box, nothing happens with your box, except that now she knows what's in it. That's indeed unsurprising. The surprising bit is that in quantum mechanics, this explanation does not work! If you assume that the spin of the particle that goes left was already decided when the original particle decayed - then this does not fit with the observations
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #3: Non-locality (2:05-3:08)

This observations of empirical data have been confirmed through many rigorous experiments over the last 100 years. All such experiments confirm the validity of quantum non-locality! In quantum mechanics, which shoe is in which box is decided at the moment one of the boxes are opened. That's the difference. I add a last cautionary note to explain why such non-locality cannot be used as communications technology by humans. When the separated entangled particles instantly update each other there is NOTHING OBSERVABLE WHICH TRAVELS THROUGH THE SPACE THAT SEPARATES THEM. Whatever the solution is to this enigma, it is not to be found in something that travels between one particle to the other. The seemingly perplexing question of quantum non-locality leads us nicely into the next variable we must define - the Measurement Problem.

Defining the MEASUREMENT PROBLEM

In this video I want to explain just what the problem is with making measurements according to quantum theory. Quantum mechanics tells us that matter is not made of particles. It is made of elementary constituents that are often called particles, but are really described by wave functions. A wave function is a mathematical which is neither a particle, not a wave - but it can have properties of both. The curious thing about the wave function, is that, it does not itself correspond to something which we can observe. Instead, it is only a tool, by help of which we calculate what we do observe
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (0:00-0:38)

The measurement problem is at its roots a problem of incompatibility. As Sabine says in another quote, half of physicists incorrectly think the measurement problem is solved by decoherence. It is not. We will shortly prove why. Further, in this section we will both define the measurement and prove it empirically - and then resolve it.

I cannot do so properly without showing you what a density matrix looks and how it works. Unfortunately it requires special mathematical fonts. (I am sure they could easily be downloadable, but I don't have the patience to search them out now.) The problem is the brackets () that enclose the matrix - they cover multiple lines. So below I am going to represent only the numbers without the brackets. You will add them mentally.

1/2 0

0 1/2

Now, just imagine there are double height parenthesis surrounding all four numbers. That's a "density matrix." It's very, very, very simple to understand. The numbers that go from top left to bottom right are called the "diagonal." In this case that would be two fractions of 1/2 each. Remember that the wave function is tool for calculating probability. That's why the probabilities must always add up to 1. In this case half and half make one. The second part of the density matrix are the "off-diagonal" numbers. These represent the numbers that are found at the top right and bottom left. In this case two zeros. Also recall that a matrix tells you about positions. So the 50/50 probabilities are telling you that there is a 50% chance of finding - say a quantum particle - in this location and the top left entry is telling you there is a 50% chance of finding it in this position. That is all simple enough to understand. Yet that is not the full story. We must find the disconnect - the incompatibility.

Look at the second half of Hossenfelder's quote again:

The curious thing about the wave function, is that, it does not itself correspond to something which we can observe. Instead, it is only a tool, by help of which we calculate what we do observe
" Sabine Hossenfelder

So the Schrodinger equation is a tool that straddles the ground between what we don't observe and what we do. To do so, quantum theory combines it with two other postulates to make sure that the probabilities we calculated match the reality we see:

To make such a calculation quantum theory uses the following postulates. First, as long as you do not measure the wave function, it changes according to the Schrodinger equation. ... The second postulate of quantum mechanics tells you how you calculate from the wave function what is the probability of getting a specific measurement outcome. ... And third, there is the measurement postulate, sometimes called the 'update' or 'collapse' of the wave function. This postulate says that after you have made a measurement, the probability of what you have measured SUDDENLY CHANGES TO ONE. This I have to emphasize is a necessary requirement to describe what we observe. I cannot stress this enough because a lot of physicists seem to find it hard to understand. If you do not update the wave function after measurement, then the wave function does not describe what we observe. We do not EVER observe a particle that is 50% measured!
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (0:39-2:54)

Postulates are just the necessary truths that are the foundation of any subsequent reasoning. So the fact that quantum theory has these three postulates just means they are the fundamental principles necessary to make calculating quantum probabilities possible. Once again they are: 1) Schrodinger's equation, 2) the Born rule, named after Max Born who discovered it, and lastly 3) the update. It is this third postulate, or founding principle, that exposes why the wave function is INCOMPATIBLE with the Schrodinger equation.

The UPDATE

This is very simple. Let's look at the density matrix of probabilities as provided by the Schrodinger equation and see why an update is necessary to be in line with observations.

1/2 0

0 1/2

Now recall two critical points from Sabine about why an update is necessary:

And third, there is the measurement postulate, sometimes called the 'update' or 'collapse' of the wave function. This postulate says that after you have made a measurement, the probability of what you have measured SUDDENLY CHANGES TO ONE. This I have to emphasize is a necessary requirement to describe what we observe.
" Sabine Hossenfelder

So the first two postulates, allow us to calculate the probabilities of phenomenon we cannot see. But the third postulate is different because it "collapses" those probabilities into actual physical certainties. Before the update, we were guessing as two where or how such and such a property was behaving quantum mechanically. But once we perform the update then we are 100% certain of the physical classical mechanical reality. AND THAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE INCOMPATIBILITY. Let me illustrate it graphically. It's:

1/2 0

0 1/2

VS

1 0

0 0

That leads us to Sabine's second critical point. (Focus on the highlighted portion):

If you do not update the wave function after measurement, then the wave function does not describe what we observe. We do not EVER observe a particle that is 50% measured!
" Sabine Hossenfelder

Once we have measured the "probability suddenly changes to one!" That's why the diagonal was 50/50 initially, but after the update, that probability has to be 100% because we have measured an actual physical thing - not a quantum reality. That point of "sudden" change is decoherence. When the wave function collapses, it goes from being a quantum phenomenon to being a classical phenomenon. We cannot directly see quantum realities, only classical phenomenon. What's wrong with that? Where is the incompatibility, you might say? That's Sabine's point about 50% of the physicists community not understanding what's going on. They mistakenly think there is no incompatibility, since decoherence solves the measurement problem. So let's clarify.

The thing whose probabilities are being calculated and the thing which results after measurement are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS! That's the source of incompatibility!:

Decoherence tells you that if you average over the states of the environment (because you do not exactly what they do), then you no longer have a quantum superposition. Instead, you have a distribution of probabilities. ... This does not solve the measurement problem because, after measurement, you still have to update the probability of what you have just observed, to 100%. Decoherence does not tell you to do that. Why is the measurement postulate problematic? The trouble with the measurement postulate is that the behaviour of a large thing like a detector SHOULD FOLLOW FROM THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE SMALL THINGS THAT IS IT MADE UP OF. But this is not the case. So that's the issue! The measurement postulate is incompatible with reductionism
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (4:24-5:14)

"Reductionism," formed from the word "reduce," is just the reasoning that a complex system can always be explained by simpler systems. Like concluding that someone who can run, can also walk. Remember, I made the point earlier, that complexity is often achieved by layering simpler systems one on top of the other. Of course, this is not always the case. Some systems cannot be reduced in this manner. This is why decoherence is not the solution to the incompatibility between Schrodinger's equation and the measurement update:

Decoherence is a process that happens if a quantum superposition interacts with its environment. The environment may simply be air, or even a vacuum - you still have the radiation of the Cosmic Microwave Background. There's always some environment! This interaction with the environment eventually destroys the ability of quantum states to display typical quantum behaviour. Like the ability of particles to create interference patterns. The larger the object, the more quickly its quantum behaviour gets destroyed
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (3:50-4:23)

So decoherence is simply the transition from probabilities - whether 50/50 as in our case, or otherwise - to 100% certainties. But that doesn't tell us HOW such a transition an apples to oranges transition takes place. Resolving the mathematics is not the point! Of course, calculated probabilities once measured change to 1. How it could it be otherwise. The problem is the probabilities are of one type of the thing and the measured entity is another type of thing - and the two have not been reconciled. Focusing on the mathematics completely misses the big picture - determining the nature of the relationship between quantum and classical particles:

What makes [quantum mechanics] difficult is not the mathematics. What makes it difficult is how to interpret the mathematics. The trouble is, you cannot directly observe the wave-function. But you cannot just get rid of it either. You need it to calculate probabilities. But the measurement update has to be done instantaneously, and therefore it does not seem to be a physical process! So, is the wave-function real? Or is it not? Physicists have debated this back and forth, for more than 100 years
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #4: It's Not So Difficult! (7:29-8:00)

Hence, the resolution to quandary of quantum mechanics is not in the mathematics, but in understanding what they are telling us. Again, it is not telling that mathematical probabilities add up to one - we all that. It is telling us something far, far more fundamental:

One of the important properties of the Schrodinger equation is that it guarantees that the probabilities computed from the wave function will always add up to one. As they should. ... But for our purposes, the most important property of the Schrodinger equation is that it is linear! This means if you have two solutions to this equation, then any sum of the solutions ... will also be a solution
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (1:00-1:36)
The Meaning of Quantum LINEARITY and Why it is so Important

Linearity in the context of quantum mechanics means quantum properties like superpositions and entanglement. No classical objects, i.e., everything we see in the world around us behave like that. Why not? THAT is the problem. If everything in the world - all baryonic matter in the universe - is made up of quantum particles at the most basic level, then why don't those resulting objects display the same properties? This is the mental paradox we have to solve - and the answer is not, cannot be mathematical:

The problem with the quantum measurement ... now [is] that, the update of the wave function is incompatible with the Schrodinger equation. The Schrodinger equation as I already said - is linear. That means, if you have two different states of a system, both of which are allowed according to the Schrodinger equation, then the sum of the two states is also an allowed solution. The best known example of this is Schrodinger's cat, which is a state that is the sum of both dead and alive. Such a sum is what physicists call a superposition. We do however, only observe cats that are either dead or alive. This is why we need the measurement postulate. Without it, quantum mechanics would not be compatible with observation. The measurement problem is not solved by decoherence!
" Sabine Hossenfelder - The Problem with Quantum Measurement (2:54-3:45)

Alright decoherence is not the answer. It focuses on the mathematical probabilities being resolved to 1 (100%). That is not a solution it is a presupposition - a postulate. You can't start calculating probabilities, unless they will add up to one. The problem is the things from which cats are made from can turn left and right at the same time - but cats cannot. Why? Hossenfelder says that many physicists, upto 50% perhaps believe that that incompatibility of the Schrodinger equation with the measurement update - both foundational postulates of quantum mechanics - has been solved. She cites a study among physicists in the relevant video, but adds that the sample size was small. No matter. The point for us, is that anyone, physicist or otherwise, who believes that has not understood quantum mechanics. The secret of understanding quantum mechanics lies in understanding the relationship between baryonic matter - and what it is made from! Again Niels Bohr, who helped in formulating one interpretation of quantum mechanics almost a century ago:

Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real. If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet
" Niels Bohr

And Sabine's take:

Quantum mechanics tells us that matter is not made of particles. It is made of elementary constituents that are often called particles, but are really described by wave functions. A wave function is a mathematical which is neither a particle, not a wave - but it can have properties of both
" Sabine Hossenfelder

So, we have defined all the relevant parts of quantum mechanics: from the wave function to superposition, to entanglement, decoherence, non-locality, and finally the measurement problem. Now it is time to explain them!

QUANTUM MECHANICS RESOLVED

Is quantum mechanics not just an abstract metaphysical concept that we don't have to bother about? NO. It is not. As Sabine just noted above: "Quantum mechanics tells us that matter is not made of particles. It is made of elementary constituents that are often called particles, but are really described by wave functions." You may not appreciate weighty significance of that statement until you think about the claims of Big Bang cosmologists - claims upon which the foundation of you World rest.

Take the intellectually challenged Intellectual Robert Jastrow (yes: there is such a thing):

I am an agnostic ... and a creator is not compatible with agnosticism… I’m what’s called a materialist in philosophy ... it means that I believe the world consists entirely of material substances and when you specify those substances - the atoms and molecules - and the laws by which they interact, you’ve done it all. There isn’t anything more to be said or inserted into your model of the universe. That’s what my science tells me ... but I find it unsatisfactory. In fact, it makes me uneasy, I feel I’m missing something
" Robert Jastrow

Hmmmm ... brilliant! Except - the little thing called Quantum Mechanics:

Quantum mechanics tells us that matter is not made of particles. It is made of elementary constituents that are often called particles, but are really described by wave functions. A wave function is a mathematical which is neither a particle, not a wave - but it can have properties of both
" Sabine Hossenfelder

Just below the level of "atoms and molecules" that Jastrow invoked, lies quantum mechanics. For it describes the behaviour of what atoms and molecules are made from. This is exactly what Newton meant when he said:

He who thinks half-heartedly will not believe in God; but he who really thinks has to believe in God
" Sir Isaac Newton

I'll add the lightweight Albert in, for good measure ...

The more I study science, the more I believe in God
Albert Einstein

Jastrow was a highly efficient non-thinker. He died in 2008 - 15 years ago this month. He was born in 1925. Three years after Niels Bohr won the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on atomic structure and quantum theory! All through his life Jastrow walked in the dark ... bumping into one mental wall after another. His Wikipedia profile lists futurist as one of his credits. He couldn't figure out he past, but he was a futurist? (Only an Intellectual would dare!) Science is about resolving doubt. His life course was about doubting resolve. Quantum mechanics was empirically established before he was born. Throughout his life: it never occurred to him to recheck his assumptions. He had good reason for "feeling uneasy." He was indeed "missing something." He was missing the essence of all reality - the lessons of Quantum Mechanics. It "faith" is the "evident demonstration of realities that are not beheld," that the opposite is also true: lack of reasoning on how the evidence demonstrates the reality is the definition of a lack of faith. As now embodied in human form, by one - Robert Jastrow

The untenable situation this places materialists in, cannot be overstated! Brian Keating and others of his ilk, are desperate, desperate, for a "naturalistic or materialistic" origin story for the universe. We have seen that Light tells them, through the zero-entropy initial conditions that, that is not the case. The fact that the entropy based one way arrow of time is traceable to non-entropic factors that existed before and were thus responsible for the initial conditions means that the origin story of the universe is not material based - it is Inzintian ... Spiritual. So Heaven/Space is spiritual, not baryonic. That's fine. That tells us that there are TWO realms, or spheres of existence in the universe - the Cosmos and Heaven/Space. But now quantum mechanics is telling us that the Cosmos and baryonic matter are also not baryonic in essence! We already know that their origin is spiritual, but not until studying quantum mechanics could we understand that even their everyday fundamental structure - is not, cannot be baryonic! What is going on here? I wouldn't ask the question - if I wasn't ready to give you the answer.

A Tantalizing Clue

Big, small, quantum, classical, physical, spiritual: just how many variables are there to describe the universe? TWO. There are only two! Spiritual and physical. All other descriptions are synonyms. So whatever details we have unearthed about quantum mechanics, they must fit into that common framework. Remember there is only one universe. And again, put another way: the universe is all that exists.

The wonderful thing about science is that when it initially resolves paradoxes it separates two or more things that were thought of as being one entity. This is what gives us Evidence Profiles. But a subsequent stage to the development of Evidence Profiles is the realization that phenomenon that were previously thought to having nothing to do with each other are SUDDENLY recognized as being one and the same thing - synthesis!

This is what occurred in the development of our understanding of electromagnetic radiation - or light. First, through many ingenious pioneers such as Newton and Fraunhoffer, among others, what light was and was not, was defined. Quite separately, developments continued elsewhere about the true nature of magnetism. Separately still, there was experimental work carried out on electricity. It would take what Kathy Joseph - of the fantastic Kathy Loves Physics and History channel on YouTube - calls: "A truly unique brain," to synthesize all the data. That honour belongs to the pioneering genius of the great Michael Faraday. Once the Evidence Profiles of these three areas of study had begun to take shape (such development in electricity and magnetism owing much to the experiments of Faraday himself), it became possible to meld them into one umbrella phenomenon - Electromagnetism. . Here is Kathy describing Faraday's thoughts on how light might be a combined form of electricity and magnetism:

Then Faraday said, what I consider one of the most influential and radical postulates in all of science history!
Kathy Joseph | Kathy Loves Physics & History - Magnetic, Electric Fields & EM Waves: History and Physics (21:10-21:18)

What did he say? ...

The view which I am so bold as to put forth considers, therefore, radiation as a high species of vibration in the lines of force ... [radiation] endeavours to dismiss the ether, but not the vibrations
" Michael Faraday | Kathy Loves Physics & History - Magnetic, Electric Fields & EM Waves: History and Physics (Screenshot at 21:20)

That was just an example of how experiments lead to resolution of scientific paradoxes. Such resolution leads to the compilation of Evidence Profiles. And Evidence Profiles lead to eventual synthesis of previously regarded, "s-e-p-a-r-a-t-e" phenomenon.

How, though, are we going to synthesize Evidence Profiles. To do so you need a unifying entity - in the case of electromagnetism: it is light! Is there a unifying entity with quantum mechanics? Indeed there is ... and we all know and love them - Angels!

Anyone who says they don't believe in the spirit realm, also doesn't believe in the initial conditions, or science, or quantum mechanics - in a word: they don't believe in Science What follows then, is a synthesizing of all we know - everything we have learnt thus far.

Explaining the WAVE FUNCTION

The wave function is a mathematical tool that describes the quantum reality of entities that are neither waves or particles, but can behave as both. That is the Evidence Profile of Invisible Zint. For the distinguishing mark of all such behaviour is non self-interference. It is this ability to not self-interfere that is responsible for the interference patterns of waves. Both Invisible Zint and quantum structures demonstrate this pattern.

As I said earlier, there are only two realms in the universe - and all phenomenon must fit into these categories, for: "To the same effects, we must as far as possible, assign the same causes." Thus quantum non-interference is the same thing as Inzintian non-interference. And this explains our next topic ...

Explaining SUPERPOSITION

We understand superposition in quantum mechanics. We also understand superposition in angels - for it is one and the same dynamic. Recall the cherubs of Ezekiel's vision. They had four faces. FOUR FACES! The vision was able to portray a dramatic illustration of what defined a cherub. The four individual faces did not necessarily mean that cherubs are four-headed, but rather that to their Inzintian capabilities cannot be fully described without the representations of the four faces - and what they represent. I will not get into Biblical symbolism here. It is superfluous to our aims. What is important, is to note that angels can exist in superpositional states. That is what we defined as Legionisity earlier when discussing how Jesus expelled several thousand demons from one man. How were they all able to inhabit one space? Through superpositions - enabled by their non-interfering supernature. And just as multiple demons can be in superposition with each other, A single angel can be in superposition with itself. That's what the four-headed nature of the cherubs of Ezekiel's visions signify.

How do we know. It is one thing for angels to be in superposition with each other, and quite another for one to be in superposition with itself. Actually, no. It is not. Note Sabine's words on the applicability of quantum superpositions:

Keep in mind that the density matrix in general does not describe a collection of particles or a sequence of measurements. It might well just describe one single particle
Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #5: Decoherence (10:39-10:49)

So the measurement of quantum entities does not mean multiple entities. Whatever is possible for a collection of quantum particles is reproducible with one. How do we know? Because of linearity. The fact that any quantum mechanics any two solutions to an equations are valid - but so is their sum. For instance, can an angel standing in place and have a second angel stand in the exact same place? Yes, that's what non-interference - and legionisity - means. Can that same angel place one foot on the ground, and then place his second foot in the same spot, thus going into the first foot? Yes. And for the same reasons - non-interference. The fact that angels do not interfere with each other, means they also do not interfere with themselves. That's superposition. What about entanglement?

Explaining ENTANGLEMENT

Entanglement, we will remember, within the context of quantum mechanics is when a superpostioned quantum particle in baryonic matter decays and splits into two separate particles. Decay does not happen to Invisible Zint - as you will remember. So entanglement manifests itself differently in the spiritual realm. All spirit beings have the capacity for entanglement. In fact, it's how they get things done.

Recall the cherubs who were controlling Jehovah's chariot with their spirit - or vital energy. Or, the angel who broke Peter out of jail and similarly made the gate open "of its own accord," that is, without physical contact. Both these are example of entanglement. The key feature of entanglement, you might remember, is the fact that entangled particles are correlated and update each other non-locally instantaneously! This last fact has bothered physicists, and is in fact a mystery among them for the last 100 years! Here's Sabine:

But the measurement update has to be done instantaneously, and therefore it does not seem to be a physical process! So, is the wave-function real? Or is it not? Physicists have debated this back and forth, for more than 100 years
" Sabine Hossenfelder - Understanding Quantum Mechanics #4: It's Not So Difficult! (7:46-8:00)

Now you know what Niels Bohr meant when he said, "Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real!" Of course he can be excused for his ignorance, because he lived many years before the discovery of Invisible Zint, which has the exact same Evidence Profile of the things he regarded as not "real." Now, as I said earlier, there are only two realms in the universe. Thus, all descriptions of the phenomena found therein must fit into one or other of those realms - since there isn't a third option. That makes all other descriptions of certain aspects of reality SYNONYMS of those two realms - either Spiritual or Physical. So we can express something as being baryonic or Inzintian, visible or invisible, physics based or spirics based, but in all these cases these alternate terms are synonyms for physical and spiritual. As it happens with Bohr, we don't have to convert synonyms to the base, fundamental definitions because Bohr and Hossenfelder have used the correct terminology: the quantum process says Sabine "does not seem to be a PHYSICAL PROCESS." And Sabine's statement clarifies what Bohr and indeed all physicists would mean when they say something "cannot be regarded as REAL." They mean not physical! Both Hossenfelder and Bohr are, of course, right! The measurement update between entangled particles is indeed not a physical process - it is a spiritual one! When there are only two options, if it is not the one; it is the other. Of course, we will rest our case on just that single thread of what we can call circumstantial evidence. Faith/reason is based on "evident demonstration[s]," hence, we are interested only in examining if the Evidence Profiles match up - as we are now doing. Property by property.

As we have established previously, one of the ways in which Spirics is different to Physics, is where and how force is applied. In physics, this is done externally; in spirics it is done internally. Angels accomplish such actions internal control of objects, such as the baryonic gates, and the Inzintian wheels by putting their "spirit" into the foreign object and controlling it from within. When the angel want to perform an action, their spirit performs the corresponding action in the foreign object - because their spirit is "entangled."

In the case of Jehovah and his Christ, this manoeuverability extends beyond inanimate objects, to other intelligent beings. However in such cases having God's Holy Spirit never amounts to being controlled by him the way the angel controlled the gate. Jehovah's spirit NEVER controls the people Jehovah blesses with it. It merely prompts! It is up to the individual whether or not they will follow the leadings of God's spirit:

For all who are led by God’s spirit are indeed God's sons
Ro 8:14
Furthermore, if you are being led by spirit, you are not under law
Gal 5:18

It is easy to show that this leading is a gentle prodding, and not an act of programming, since people who have been blessed with Jehovah's holy spirit can grieve it. This happens when they act - out of free will - completely opposite to its subtle indications:

Also, do not be grieving God's holy spirit, with which you have been sealed for a day of releasing by ransom. Put away from yourselves every kind of malicious bitterness, anger, wrath, screaming, and abusive speech, as well as everything injurious. But become kind to one another, tenderly compassionate, freely forgiving one another just as God also by Christ freely forgave you
Eph 4:30-32

Remember, Jehovah's spirit is his consciousness, his mind. Just like your mind can have a thought and you reject it, it works similarly with the presence of Jehovah's holy mind. This, by the way is how the Bible was written:

All Scripture is inspired of God
2Ti 3:16a

And ...

For prophecy was at no time brought by man's will, but men spoke from God as they were moved by holy spirit
2Pe 1:21
However, when they hand you over, do not become anxious about how or what you are to speak, for what you are to speak will be given you in that hour; for the ones speaking are not just you, but it is the spirit of your Father that speaks by you
Mt 10:19,20

As the greatest scientist who ever lived was well aware:

I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by men who were inspired. I study the Bible daily. Opposition to godliness is atheism in profession and idolatry in practice
" Sir Isaac Newton

But in addition to Jehovah, above I also said that the Christ's spirit is sent to those by Jehovah - his anointed Christians. Which is it: Christ's spirit, or Jehovah's that sent into us? Both. Here's how. First, we establish the actual fact that anointed Christians have both Jehovah's and Christ's spirits:

But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you
Joh 14:26

Only Jehovah's spirit is ever referred to with the adjective: "Holy." So the anointing of 144 000 Christians is performed through Jehovah's and not Christ's spirit:

And as for you, the anointing that you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to be teaching you; but the anointing from him is teaching you about all things and is true and is no lie. Just as it has taught you, remain in union with him
1Jo 2:27

All is clear. As Christ has already testified to the "him" in this verse refers to the "Father." There are other scriptures that so directly, but I don't want to quote 5 scriptures to make an obvious point.

Now we move on to Christ. Are the anointed also gifted with Christ's spirit?:

And he went on to say: "Abba, Father, all things are possible to you; remove this cup from me. Yet not what I want, but what you want." So you are no longer a slave but a son; and if a son, then you are also an heir through God
Mr 14:36

Spot the Evidence Profile ...

Now because you are sons, God has sent the spirit of his Son into our hearts, and it cries out: "Abba, Father!"
Ga 4:6,7

Then Romans brings it all home by showing both dynamics - being "led by God's Spirit" and the fact that that spirit is nested with Christ's - in the same verse:

So, then, brothers, we are under obligation, not to the flesh to live according to the flesh; for if you live according to the flesh, you are sure to die; but if you put the practices of the body to death by the spirit, you will live. For all who are led by God's spirit are indeed God's sons. For you did not receive a spirit of slavery causing fear again, but you received a spirit of adoption as sons, by which spirit we cry out: "Abba, Father!" The spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are God's children. If, then, we are children, we are also heirs - heirs indeed of God, but joint heirs with Christ - provided we suffer together so that we may also be glorified together
Ro 8:12-17

I spoke of "nesting," with which we are all intimately familiar by now. For it to be so there must be scriptural proof! Speaking prophetically of Christ's sojourn to the Earth the Holy Bible says:

A twig will grow out of the stump of Jes'se, and a sprout from his roots will bear fruit. And the spirit of Jehovah will settle upon him, the spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the spirit of counsel and of mightiness, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Jehovah
Isa 11:1,2

Here's is a scripture that helps you identify the twig of Jesse, if you are unfamiliar with the Bible:

I, Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you about these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David and the bright morning star
Re 22:16

We don't even have to guess as to WHEN this nesting of Christ's and Jehovah's spirits happened. It was at his baptism by John the Baptist! Here is the historical record of that nesting event:

Now when all the people were baptized, Jesus too was baptized. As he was praying, the heaven was opened up, and the holy spirit in bodily form like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: "You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you."
Lu 3:21,22

And here is eyewitness testimony from the great man who performed that holy service on God's behalf:

John also bore witness, saying: "I viewed the spirit coming down as a dove out of heaven, and it remained upon him. Even I did not know him, but the very One who sent me to baptize in water said to me: 'Whoever it is upon whom you see the spirit coming down and remaining, this is the one who baptizes in holy spirit.' And I have seen it, and I have given witness that this one is the Son of God."
Joh 1:32-34

I believe all is clear. We don't need to discuss the technical details, for you are smart enough to have worked out that these two spirits exist in a superpositional nested state in Christ and in all the holy ones - the holy anointed children of God! That, after all, is the point of this section - in synthesizing the Scientific and Biblical Evidence Profiles! It is due to entanglement, the holy ones have the right to say "Father" to the Most High. And it is due to entanglement, that we have the power to not be led by the flesh - but by the "Spirit!" To be clear then, the quantum property of entanglement is manifested in the heavenly realm, not by Jehovah, or Christ, or the angels being able to split their bodies in two - but by their being able to distribute their spirit outside of themselves, and into other objects. This is how spirit beings move things, through spirics. In the same way we move them externally, with our hands, or some other external force.

We move onto ...

Explaining Quantum NON-LOCALITY

With our understanding getting sharper and sharper, we now tackle, what is perhaps the easiest aspect of quantum mechanics to explain, since it follows from the dynamics of the others. Why is non-locality a spiritual process? Because it can only be done with entangled particles. Baryonic matter cannot be correlated to distant baryonic matter WITHOUT SOME TYPE OF CAUSAL CONTACT. Let's think of it from several different angles to make sure we understand it fully. Can angels, through entanglement, be at two places at once? No. because they have Inzintian bodies that are made up of many different members, as we have already established. Why then can Inzintian spirit be entangled? Because it is NOT EMBODIED! Remember? It is phase-functional. That's how we know the Holy Spirit is not a person - a being separate from Jehovah - but rather his personal power/mind/consciousness.

Just like angels must actually travel the Space between Heaven and Earth, so the holy spirit must travel to Earth when Jehovah "send[s]" it. Neither spirit beings, nor their spirits disappear in one place and appear in another. They must all travel the distance between. That's why Jehovah created the Heavens with their hollow filaments, in the way that he did. If angels and the spirits travel through the universe by actually going from here to there, does it take time for them to do so when Jehovah is bending Space/Heaven? Yes, it does. (Even when bending Space it takes time to travel. It might be a fraction of a second(s), but some time does elapse - God is a worker; not a magician!) That being the case how come entanglement between vast distances is instant, taking no time? That's what non-locality means. It means an update that is performed instantly WITHOUT ANY CAUSAL CONTACT. Let's say Jehovah has sent an angel to Earth. Did it take time to arrive? Yes. Perhaps a blink of an eye to us - or in any case incredibly fast. Recall that the angel arrived on Earth to answer Daniel before he had finished praying. The only narrower definition of how long it might take is when Christ said he could appeal to his Father to send him more than 12 legions of angels "at this moment!" (Mt 26:53) Wow! So that is what we go with. It takes a moment. When you read the account you will realize that at this moment is not connected to the possible petition, but to Jehovah answering it by supplying the angels. Even better than the example of Jehovah sending the angel to Earth, let's use Christ at this very moment in the Garden of Gethsemane. When he prayed earlier in the Garden, did his prayers have to travel to God locally? No, because Jehovah's spirit was in Jesus, therefore the prayer was not transmitted. Jehovah "heard" it immediately - without any time elapsing because of his entangled spirit was present in Christ. How about when God sent the Holy Spirit to Christ at this baptism - did it have to travel locally taking a moment then? Yes. See the difference? Traveling takes time - a moment because it has to be done locally. But once arrived, the measurement update is instantaneous - because entanglement means the "update" doesn't travel locally. It is a NON-LOCAL spiritual phenomenon! Hossenfelder and Bohr were right: the lesson of quantum mechanics is that the particles that make up matter are not physical - but spiritual.

Well ... half right. Half right, because they then define that non-physicalness as being "not real." That's missing the forest from the trees. As Sabine said: the "difficult" part "is not the mathematics," but "how to interpret the mathematics." The mathematics of "Quantum Mechanics" is telling us that the most fundamental reality is not physical nature - but spiritual Supernature! This is why I say the evolutionary materialists and naturalists are in a bind they cannot get out of. Space - their greatest ambition - is a spiritual entity; and baryonic matter - their greatest hope for disproving the existence of God IS ALSO A SPIRITUAL REALITY. That means baryonic matter exists in a spiritual sandwich. At both ends of the scale of reality: from the very large - the one-piece universe wide scaffolding of cosmic matter known as Space or Heaven; to the very very small non-baryonic wavelike particles from which all baryonic matter is made and which quantum mechanics tells us are also not physical - but spiritual. ISN'T SCIENCE WONDERFUL!

Just before we leave this section, a final thought. Christ was entangled with Jehovah through being anointed with holy spirit, allowing his prayers to be heard without needing to traverse the space between Heaven and Earth - they didn't travel locally; they were "updated" non-locally. What about your prayers? They too are updated locally. Not because you have Jehovah's holy spirit, but because you have his "breath of life!" Thus anyone who prays to God sincerely is heard by him though entanglement. We are proof seekers, so here it is:

The breath of a man is the lamp of Jehovah, searching through his innermost being
Pr 20:27

Certainly, you know that any part of the body that is not supplied oxygen through capillaries and the whole circulatory system - dies! In keeping with that principle Jehovah states the above. Since the breath of life must penetrate to all parts of the body, to keep it alive, it also informs God about every detail of our status. It is a nested reality. You cannot breath without providing Jehovah with information. This, in fact, is how he reads hearts. That's what the above verse is telling you. And it is for this reason that:

For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints from the marrow, and is able to discern thoughts and intentions of the heart. And there is not a creation that is hidden from his sight, but all things are naked and openly exposed to the eyes of the one to whom we must give an account
Heb 4:12,13

Are you sober yet? Why, how is it able to "discern thoughts and intentions of the heart?" Because, the emergent property we call the spirit of man - or his "breath" - is a nested reality of Jehovah's breath of life with ours. Our spirit as we said before, it our mind - our consciousness! That's why only the spirit of man "knows" his thoughts. It is because it is our mind:

For it is to us God has revealed them through his spirit, for the spirit searches into all things, even the deep things of God. For who among men knows the things of a man except the man's spirit within him? So, too, no one has come to know the things of God except the spirit of God
1Co 2:10,11

Just as God's own holy spirit searches through Him! - so your spirit searches through you, as per Proverbs. However your spirit is an emergent reality that manifests only when Jehovah's spirit (not holy spirit, but breath of life) is merged with a baryonic body ... and "the man CAME to be a living soul/[person]." (Ge 2:7) It is that emergent property that Jehovah uses as his lamp, since it nested with his spirit, which in turn is entangled with him. This allows him to k-n-o-w e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g - including our most intimate intentions and darkest secrets:

In like manner, the spirit also joins in with help for our weakness; for the problem is that we do not know what we should pray for as we need to, but the spirit itself pleads for us with unuttered groanings. But the one who searches the hearts knows what the meaning of the spirit is, because it is pleading in harmony with God for the holy ones

The above scripture applies solely to the anointed, but the principle of "why" and "how" Jehovah knows the thoughts of our hearts, applies to all humans. That's why you don't need to say your prayers out loud!. Here's more:

If you say, "But we did not know about this," does not the One who examines hearts discern it? Yes, the One who watches you will know and will repay each man according to his activity
Pr 24:12
For I am not conscious of anything against myself. But by this I am not proved righteous; the one who examines me is Jehovah. Therefore, do not judge anything before the due time, until the Lord comes. He will bring the secret things of darkness to light and make known the intentions of the hearts, and then each one will receive his praise from God
1Co 4:4,5

Are you sober yet?

Do you understand now how futile any plans God's enemies try to hatch against his anointed ones are? That is why he says the wicked will be caught in their own trap. The king of Syria was one who learned this lesson in dramatic fashion. After plan, after plan of his kept getting foiled, he angrily asked his subjects who in his kingdom was a traitorous spy? The answer was simple:

Now the king of Syria went to war against Israel. He consulted with his servants and said: "I will encamp at such and such a place with you." Then the man of the true God sent word to the king of Israel, saying: "Beware of passing by this place, because that is where the Syrians are coming down." 10 So the king of Israel sent word to the place that the man of the true God had warned him about. He kept warning him, and he stayed away from there on several occasions. This enraged the king of Syria, so he summoned his servants and said to them: "Tell me! Who among us is on the side of the king of Israel?" Then one of his servants said: "None of us, my lord the king! It is E·li'sha the prophet in Israel who tells the king of Israel the things that you say in your own bedroom."
2Ki 6:8-12

That's Non-locality. We have now understood this wonderful quantum property, and seen how it powers time independent measurement updates! Next, decoherence.

Explaining DECOHERENCE

You love surf and sun, so you decide to move to California, so you can be right by the beach. Your beachfront property costs a packet but you are willing to invest in it because of your love of coastal living and your wish to be close, right up against the beach. You're a surfer and this is your Sweet Spot.

Why are you not afraid your house will get swept away by the waves? Because you understand surfing, sandbars and how they cause waves to "break." This comforts you - knowing that your beachfront property is safe; while you have such easy access to the ocean waves. How would you describe the "decree" that God placed for the limit of where the "proud waves" must stop, and go no further? Is it a benefit, or a problem?

The situation is exactly the same when it comes to quantum mechanics and the so-called measurement problem. This "problem" is the limit between the two realms of the universe: the spiritual and the physical. Without it there would be no baryonic matter, nor any humans, nor the user interface that allows us to feel pleasure. How should you view the quantum limit, then? How do you view the point, past which, quantum realities become classical phenomenon?

You recall that "pure energy" is Jehovah's Holy Spirit. It is what he used to create all other forms of energy and the actual material that fills the universe - whether Inzintian, or baryonic! Since baryonic matter is made from Invisible Zint but is different to it, there has to be a partition, a line where the properties inherent to Invisible Zint are restricted, and new properties are produced. This is the point of decoherence. Einstein said:

Matter is spirit reduced to point of visibility
Albert Einstein

That point is known as decoherence.

On the one side of the partition are quantum mechanics, whose properties represent non-physical, spiritual realities. On the other, is classical mechanics, whose properties represent baryonic realities as regulated by the laws of physics. It is obvious that this "partition" between realms would have a limiting, lessening effect. Nothing can be greater than the Invisible Zint from which Jehovah is made! And the Bible clearly tells us that, "Jehovah is the Spirit!" (2Co 3:17) As such, nothing, no material or zint, can be greater than Invisible Zint. Necessarily, then, baryonic matter is the lesser of the two. With this the Bible clearly agrees:

As a father shows mercy to his sons, Jehovah has shown mercy to those who fear him. For he well knows how we are formed, remembering that we are dust
Ps 103:13,14

And ...

What is mortal man that you keep him in mind, and a son of man that you take care of him? You made him a little lower than godlike ones
Ps 8:4,5a

Thus, dust (baryonic matter) is lesser than spirit (Invisible Zint). That is why I always capitalize Invisible Zint, by the way - because it is what Jehovah is made of! As such, Invisible Zint has always existed, since Jehovah has always existed. Our task in explaining decoherence is to lay out how God used his Holy Spirit - "pure energy" - as the source zint from which he created all other matter, Inzintian and ... in the specific case of decoherence - baryonic matter. This "reduction," as Einstein correctly surmised, is the decoherence limit that separates the quantum particles from which all baryonic matter is made, from the classical baryonic objects that they produce. It is important to note that this limit is on the quantum side of reality, not at decoherence exactly, or after decoherence in the classical visible, physical realm of the universe. Just like waves don't break on the beach, or on land, but in the ocean - just before they reach the beach! If you're going to stop properly at the stop sign, you must start applying your brakes before you reach it.

Jehovah accomplishes this reduction through the constants of the universe. By constraining various forces in the Cosmos to their values as discovered and catalogued by humans, he was creating the realm we know as the visible Cosmos. He was "reducing spirit to [the] point of visibility." This constants would relate to numbers like the speed fo light in a vacuum, the force of the electron charge and so on. By defining what these numbers where he was fine tuning how he wanted the universe to be - what properties he wanted it to have. But we will not explain decoherence by going through and explaining the catalogue of different constants. We only have to understand and explain one such constant to get the clear and full picture of what is happening, for all the other relevant constants flow naturally from this foundational baryonic constant. It is the Fine Structure Constant. A small number, with immense significance.

What is the Fine Structure Constant?

First let us state it directly: it is 1/137! Essentially 1/137 is the factor by which Jehovah reduced the properties of Invisible Zint in order to produce the quantum properties that are fundamental to the existence of baryonic matter and exist just on the other side of decoherence. On the quantum, not classical side, of decoherence. I will explain them, then show how they lead to decoherence. The reason that it is the only constant we have to consider, is because all the other constants and the relationships between them are defined in one way, or another by this number - the fine structure constant. In describing its properties, I will be referencing two YouTube videos on the subject. One from Arvin Ash, and the other from Matt O'Dowd. I will also be referring to a December 2020 article from The Atlantic, magazine. All quotes from the three sources will be grouped per feature being discussed, not features grouped per source quoted.

MYSTIFIED: WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT IT

For over a hundred years, scientists have been mystified by the fine structure constant. And the more their technology improved, allowing for ever more precise measurements of it, the more marvel it caused. Below are some examples of what the early pioneers of quantum theory thought about this pivotal number:

Renowned Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli, for whom the Pauli exclusion principle is named, once said: 'When I die, my first question to the Devil will be: What is the meaning of the of the fine structure constant?' American physicist Richard Feynman described it as a 'magic number that comes to us with no understanding.' This constant, represented by the Greek letter alpha, appears on the surface to be nothing special. It's just a dimensionless number, so no matter what units you use, it will always have the same value - approximately 1/137. Yet, it's precise value could not be more important. Some studies show that if it was different by just 4% - you and I would not exist, because stars could not make carbon and oxygen, elements essential for life
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (0:05-0:51)

The reason they have the wrong, or rather no answers, has a lot to do with where they direct their questions. The Bible makes it clear that much of this "confusion" is staged. Many people understand perfectly well what the data is telling them, for God made it intelligible to them. After, all we are made in his image, and as one commentator said, "Science is the process of thinking God's thoughts after him." No, the Bible state plainly that many who will know the truth of their discoveries, will feign ignorance about their significance, in an effort to rob him of his glory:

For God's wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way, because what may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world's creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable. For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their senseless hearts became darkened
Ro 1:18-21

Yes. The hatred is that deep. No matter. They are of no account. For the data is in. We have Evidence Profiles. And we must all reason on the Evidence Profiles for ourselves.

UBIQUITOUS NATURE

More than anything else the aspect of the fine structure constant that disturbed physicists, was its universal nature. It is found everywhere in the foundations of nature - in the constants of nature:

This constant seems to turn up everywhere in physics, like [in] the quantum theory governing the electromagnetic force. Yet its value cannot currently be predicted directly from any theory
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (0:59-1:08)

O'Dowd gives a fuller explanation of why it is so intriguing:

If this number only appeared in the formula for the fine structure splitting of spectral lines it would maybe just be a fine oddity - except this started to show up everywhere. For example the repulsive energy between two electrons is 137 times smaller than the energy of a photon with a wavelength equal to the distance between those electrons. And the orbital speed of an electron in the ground state of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom is a 137 slower than the speed of light. And the energy of that ground state election, is smaller than the rest mass energy of the electron by a factor of 137 squared. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, for the appearances of the fine structure constant in the laws of physics. There's no obvious reason that these various ratios of properties SHOULD ALL work out to be 1/137 - or 137 to some power!
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (3:54-4:49)

What does the "repulsive energy between two electrons" being 137 times smaller than the energy of a photon mean? It means there is a ratio between the amount of energy it takes to overcome the repulsion between two electrons, and the energy of the photon whose wavelength is the distance that separates those two electrons. And that number is 137. Similarly, "orbital speed of an electron" being 137 times slower than the speed of light, means the speed at which electrons orbit around the nucleus of atoms in the Bohr model is 137 times slower than the speed of light. Again, this unique number shows up.

WHY? - THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UBIQUITY
This constant is found everywhere because, in our macro world, the two fundamental forces we directly experience most are gravity and electromagnetism. You know how important gravity is, but electromagnetism is everywhere too! For example, in the form of light, which are electromagnetic waves, your cell phone electronics, and chemistry - since it's the interaction of negatively charged electrons and atomic nuclei, in atoms and molecules. Thus the chemistry of life is determined by electromagnetism. Since the fine structure constant characterizes the strength of this electromagnetic force - it's critical for life!
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (5:11-5:46)

Electromagnetism and gravity are the foundations of the Cosmos. Much earlier in our blog, when we were first discussing Invisible Zint and still calling it by its ill-conceived, atheistic-based name "dark matter," we established that the DIFFERENCE between the Inzintian and baryonic realms was electromagnetism! It is the lack or presence of electromagnetism that makes something invisible or visible or invisible. It is the lack or presence of electromagnetism that makes something spiritual or physical, Inzintian or baryonic. Electromagnetism is the dividing line between the two realms of the universe! And understanding how the fine structure constant defines electromagnetism, means we know how Jehovah "reduced" Inzintian matter to point of visibility! Einstein was not so foolish, after all. What he got monumentally wrong with his theories of relativity, he got absolutely right in his inclinations about the relationship between visible and invisible matter. In Hebrews chapter 11, the Bible speaks of how through reason (faith), we can perceive how the "systems of things were put in order by God's word, so that what is seen has come into existence from things that are not visible." Now we know how that was done! Just like we traced the implementation of Jehovah's decree about hte "proud waves" of the seas, being restricted from flooding land again, this journey through the different aspects of the fine structure constant, teaches us all the minute details that went into turning God's purpose regarding the Cosmos into reality.

This putting "in order," to planning, wisdom, and incredible skill. Can you easily thread a needle? Then imagine working at the quantum scales Jehovah was dealing with in fine-tuning the constants of the universe! Do you understand now, when the Genesis account speaks of him as a worker. It was a tremendous accomplishment that took skill:

He is the Maker of the earth by his power, the One who established the productive land by his wisdom
Jer 10:12a

And ...

Jehovah founded the earth in wisdom
Pr 3:19a

The two sciptures also have something to say about the skill it took to create the Heavens, but we are focusing on the 'a' portions only, because we want to highlight the skill it took to put the baryonic realm - the Cosmos in order. Everything that Jehovah made on Earth is based on the fine structure constant, and the divide it creates from Invisible Zint - making a whole new realm possible ... the physical realm of electromagnetism, chemistry, the laws of thermodynamics, and gravity. And you, and me:

How many your works are, O Jehovah! You have made all of them in wisdom. The earth is full of what you have made
Ps 104:24

So there was no abracadabra. The fine structure constant and all the other fundamental constants it defines in one way or another are all an Evidence Profile that proves the truthfulness of Jehovah's words, when he says that it took working with "wisdom," to produce the Earth! It's not called the "fine structure constant" for nothing. The appearance of all solid structures in the universe are a direct function of Jehovah calculating the value of the fine structure constant! This is the pivotal ingredient that provided for the existence of all physical structures large and small. From the atom to the largest galaxies. (Re 4:11) Listen to how he lists the different "measurements" it took to get everything right - to put it "in order." This is all of Job chapter 38. Due to the length of the scriptural passage, I have left the verse numbers in for easy reference:

Then Jehovah answered Job out of the windstorm: 2 "Who is this who is obscuring my counsel and speaking without knowledge? 3 Brace yourself, please, like a man; I will question you, and you inform me. 4 Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me, if you think you understand. 5 Who set its measurements, in case you know, or who stretched a measuring line across it? 6 Into what were its pedestals sunk, or who laid its cornerstone, ... 8 and who barricaded the sea behind doors when it burst out from the womb, 9 when I clothed it with clouds and wrapped it in thick gloom, 10 when I established my limit for it and put its bars and doors in place, 11 and I said, 'You may come this far, and no farther; here is where your proud waves will stop'? 12 Have you ever commanded the morning or made the dawn know its place, 13 to take hold of the ends of the earth and to shake the wicked out of it? 14 It is transformed like clay under a seal, and its features stand out like those of a garment. ... 16 Have you gone down to the sources of the sea or explored the deep waters? 17 Have the gates of death been revealed to you, or have you seen the gates of deep darkness? 18 Have you understood the vast expanse of the earth? Tell me, if you know all of this. 19 In which direction does the light reside? And where is the place of darkness, 20 that you should take it to its territory and understand the paths to its home? 21 Do you know this because you were already born and the number of your years is great? 22 Have you entered the storehouses of the snow, or have you seen the storehouses of the hail, 23 which I have reserved for the time of distress, for the day of battle and war? 24 From what direction is light dispersed, and from where does the east wind blow on the earth? 25 Who has cut a channel for the flood and made a path for the thunderous storm cloud, 26 to make it rain where no man lives, on the wilderness where there are no humans, 27 to satisfy devastated wastelands and cause the grass to sprout? 28 Does the rain have a father, or who fathered the dewdrops? 29 From whose womb did the ice emerge, and who gave birth to the frost of heaven 30 when the waters are covered as if with stone, and the surface of the deep waters is frozen solid? 31 Can you tie the ropes of the Ki'mah constellation or untie the cords of the Ke'sil constellation? 32 Can you lead out a constellation in its season or guide the Ash constellation along with its sons? 33 Do you know the laws governing the heavens, or can you impose their authority on the earth? 34 Can you raise your voice to the clouds to cause a flood of water to cover you? 35 Can you send out lightning bolts? Will they come and say to you, 'Here we are!' 36 Who put wisdom within the clouds or gave understanding to the sky phenomenon? 37 Who is wise enough to count the clouds, or who can tip over the water jars of heaven 38 when the dust pours into a mass and the clods of earth stick together? 39 Can you hunt prey for a lion or satisfy the appetites of young lions 40 when they crouch in their lairs or lie in ambush in their dens? 41 Who prepares food for the raven when its young cry to God for help and wander about because there is nothing to eat?
Job Chapter 38

As Einstein said, "God is a scientist, not a magician!" Understanding all that went into the fine structure constant stretches human thinking to its limits - there are so many layers. You will notice that Jehovah only asked about large scale phenomenon. Nothing in the passage touches on the quantum world. But, of course we recognize that this was early in human history. Long before scientific considerations became commonplace. This is Jehovah speaking in general terms. Nonetheless the fact that he had to measure to get things right, comes through loud and clear. Also highlighted is the fact that his creation are a "system of things," as brought out in Hebrews. That means he has to make things work even where "no man lives." Another way of saying that is that he doesn't create effects, for us to see (which is what people like Scott Adam's of Dilbert fame, who believe that life is computer simulation - believe in). No, each of Jehovah's creative works has its own function and needs. He has created ecosystems in such a way that all the animals have enough to eat. And each subsystem is complete in and of itself. Jehovah has painstakenly thought of every detail! Does he not deserve the credit for his historical accomplishments? These are not ideas floating in some ether. He has already done this feats and they are before us all to test and examine:

How many your works are, O Jehovah! You have made all of them in wisdom. The earth is full of what you have made
Ps 104:24

It is not just that the fine structure constant is responsible for separating the universe into two realms, by producing electromagnetism:

So, the fine structure constant sets the 'strength' of the electromagnetic force.
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (6:23-6:28)

It is what is achieved by setting it at precisely 1/137!

So, in our universe, [the fine structure constant] is relatively balanced, not too low, not too high. You might say the fine structure constant is in the Goldilocks zone
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (11:42-11:49)

Having gone on this journey with me through all the previous sections, you can appreciate my hatred for Intellectuals and their constant snarky attempts to paint Jehovah's accomplishments as random acts of some fluke metaphysical cause. "In our universe?" What other universe is there? They never stop trying to persuade us that it is not God who is responsible for all we see - in spite of everything the evidence, their evidence says!

As we were saying: the significance of the fine structure constant goes beyond "reducing" the spirit to the point of being visible, i.e., to limiting it to the point where all the baryonic matter that makes up the Cosmos comes into existence. It's true significance, the reason the number is 1/137 is brought out in the last past of Arvin's words, "You might say that the fine structure constant is in the Goldilocks zone." Goldilocks zone for what? LIFE. What I have been calling the Sweet Spot all along. Understanding that allows us to narrow down when and how this unique number came to be. It also show us that the number had to be precisely 1/137 - not 1/138; not 1/136!

The fine structure constant, also known as alpha, then, determines the strength of the electromagnetic force, by determining the values of all its subsystems, like electron charge, and the orbital speed of electrons, in the Bohr model. If is the subsystems of the electromagnetic force had different values they would create different dynamics with the EM force being stronger or weaker, accordingly:

The more chance of interaction between the electron and the electromagnetic fields, the more of an EM disturbance each electron will make. So, it's starting to make sense why the fine structure constant appears in all of these formulas that depend on the electromagnetic force. But the big question still remains: why does alpha take on the value that it does? And why does this specific combination of other fundamental constants come out to be exactly alpha?
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (6:29-7:00)

Notice that the EM force regulates the "interaction" of electrons with their electronic field lines, as discussed in our section on gravity. The "EM disturbance each electron" makes, is of course referring to the release or absorption of photons - or the production of light. Just as we proved in that earlier section. But we are now more interested in the second part of what O'Dowd has to say: "But the big question still remains: why does alpha take on the value that it does? And why does this specific combination of other fundamental constants come out to be exactly alpha?" The second part of the question is less interesting so we will answer it first. We have already answered it. In fact, O'Dowd answers it himself in one of his quotes a little further down. The answer is relevant now, so I will reproduce it here: "... The fine structure constant also represents the relationship between many real, physical aspects of the universe." We can say that because the formula for the number includes several variables, which are also constants of nature. Thus by rearranging these variables into different forms of the same equation, we can glean insight into the relationships they describe. That is how we know, for instance, that the orbital speed of he electron (in the Bohr model) is 137 times slower that the speed of light! Using this technique, we can come to firm conclusions about which structures in the universe, are a function of the fine structure constant. We can determine what it physically represents.

WHAT DOES IT PHYSICALLY REPRESENT?

More than being an equation that describes the electromagnetic force, the fine structure constant also shows us how other fundamental forces are related - to each other:

Numbers and equations are nice, but now the question is, what is the physical interpretation of the formula that leads to this mystery number? If we examine the formula closely, there are a few different ways we can write it out and think of what that number represents. First, if we rewrite the formula in a slightly different way, we get a ratio that looks this. This represents the ratio of two energies: the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of two electrons, that are a distance 'd' apart - and the energy of a photon with the wavelength lambda. Another way, to rearrange this formula results in a ratio that may be even easier to understand. This essentially represents the ratio of the speed of an electron in a classical orbit, to the speed of light. In other words, the speed of an electron, orbiting the classical model of an atom is about 1/137th, the speed of light
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (2:54-3:51)

That's the answer to the second, uninteresting question from O'Dowd. We now tackle his big question: "Why does alpha take the value that it does?" To answer this question we will have to do in two parts, because the fine structure constant, you will remember, defines the electromagnetic force. As such, it forms the dividing line between the two realms of the universe: the spiritual realm and the physical realm. Our answer would be incomplete if it didn't factor in both of those variables. Let's start with the physical realm.

On the physical side of things, we want to emphasize how it is responsible for the physical functions of chemistry, biology, thermodynamics etc:

Now, how is this number useful in modern physics? The number is directly related to the strength of the electromagnetic force. In other words, it represents the strength of the interaction between two charged particles
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (4:24-4:37)

That means all the dynamics of the different disciplines in the physical sciences are determined at a fundamental level by the parameters set by the fines structure constant:

So, for example the higher the value, the greater the strength of attraction between an electron and a proton, and equivalently, the greater the strength of repulsion between two of the same charges, such as two electrons. You might say, well, this sounds a lot like Coulomb's constant, in Coulomb's law, which relates what the force between two charges would be, separated by a distance 'r,' would be. Well, you would be spot on because one way to thing of the fine structure constant is like Coulomb's constant, expressed in dimensionless units
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (4:38-5:10)

Another law it mimics of course is Newton's law of universal gravitation - and for the same reason. As we have discussed, Coulomb's law and Newton's law have the same form because they are referencing different aspects of the same phenomena. In any case, because the fine structure constant sets he strength of the fundamental building blocks of the physical realm and determines their interactivity, it regulates the physical realm at a fundamental level. It is not a mathematical construct. It is a number with real life consequences. Examining its fundamental aspects allows us to see how it makes life possible - how it enables the "Goldilocks Zone"

THE SCIENCE OF THE SWEET SPOT

The reason most people like staying within the societal guidelines of their chosen "tribe," is because most people don't have the ability, to think outside of the box. Their creative imaginations are limited. Hence, they find prescribed guidelines comforting and reassuring - because, at least that way, the know what to do. This is not necessarily negative. As Jordan Peterson says, creativity is "... A high risk, high return game. You're a lot safer in your life to find a functioning entity, and to operate as a cog within it - as long as the entity keeps functioning." Thus, in such instances, choosing the entity equals choosing your beliefs, as the whole rational behind being a cog is safety in numbers. And the safest position, is the central cog in such a machine. Centrality in this case doesn't represent power, but being the most aligned with the overall beliefs of that particular "tribal" thinking. If that is true for normal people, how much more so do you think it applies to credentialed Intellectuals? It is for this reason that the model we adopt for how we will live our lives determines, to a large degree, the decisions we will make. Similarly, within the scientific community, the scientific model its members adopt signifies the parameters to which their minds will be restricted - despite evidence to the contrary. Think Joseph Priestley. Think Albert Michelson. These are scientists who went to their graves clutching onto debunked scientific claims, that they themselves furnished the experimental proof for! It's the curse of "dephlogisticated" thinking. And it pervades the whole scientific enterprise today.

In current scientific practice, this means even if Intellectuals have all the data, they will always interpret it incorrectly - due to their false assumptions. "In his haughtiness, the wicked man makes no investigation; all his thoughts are: 'There is no God.'" (Ps 10:4) So, unfortunately, it is impossible to quote Intellectuals without having to sort out the wheat from the chaff. No matter what truthful evidence they may present, it is always distorted by lies. To get to the unsullied truth then, we must always do a forensic inspection of any claims attached to the data we are interested in. It is no different here:

When I say that alpha takes on a specific value, I'm not telling you everything. Sometimes it doesn't. In fact, the fine structure constant isn't as constant as it sounds. It changes with the energy of the interaction. The higher the energy, the larger the constant. In the insane energies right after the Big Bang, the coupling constant for the EM field, which was then joined with the other forces, would have been close to 1, but it quickly dropped to lower values as the energy dropped, and the forces separated. We're now at the bottom of the energy scale: and the fine structure constant has bottomed out - at 1/137.035999. But there's no reason that we know of that it shouldn't have dropped all the way to zero, rather than stopping at this minimum value. However, we should be glad of this fact, because an alpha equal zero universe, would mean no electromagnetism, and that would mean ... no atoms!
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (7:00-8:00)

We are NOT at the bottom of any energy continuum. The fine structure constant has always had the value it holds today, because as we have established there were never any elevated energies in the universe. The Earth, the original and central object in the universe, had water on its surface, from before initial conditions - a scenario which is impossible in the elevated temperatures of the Big Bang. What's more matter preceded radiation. Just like Genesis 1:1 comes before Genesis 1:3, and that historical record is a chronological record of that development! So the fine structure constant has always been 1/137.035999. We are not interested in the dephlogisticated confusion, only the actual empirical data. And that tell us why and how alpha produces electromagnetism - and ATOMS! O'Dowd, then goes onto describe how narrowly precise the fine structure constant is ...

And actually, we are luckier than you think. This constant sets the size of atoms - a larger value means electrons would be closer to nuclei, making them more tightly bound, and less able to participate in chemical bonds. A smaller value would mean electrons were less tightly bound, making atoms and molecules less stable
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (8:01-8:22)

As we have come to understand, there is no "luck" involved. All that exists, is due to the benevolent will of loving and hyper-creative God - Jehovah Most Precious. (Re 4:11) Versus:

We don't know why our universe ended up with the particular value for the fine structure constant, or indeed any of the other fundamental constants. Many physicists believe that these constants were set more or less randomly at the beginning at the beginning of the universe! It would be surprising that they landed on just the right values to allow the formation of life! Unless, of course, there are many, many universes with different values for the constants. Then it's not at all surprising that we find ourselves in one of the universes capable of producing us
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (8:33-9:04)

Do you see how O'Dowd mirrors Ash? In contrast to agnostics and atheists, who, like Jastrow "are missing something," we readily reason on the facts at hand. As we noted earlier through George Ellis, claims in alternate universes are a means of wishing away the fin-tuning clearly apparent in the universe. They will consider every ridiculous impossibility, while never assessing the validity of the only logical conclusion. They fail the guiding principles of the scientific method:

Nothing occurs contrary to nature except the impossible, and that never occurs
Galileo Galilei

And ...

When you have eliminated the impossible, what is left, no matter how unlikely, is the truth
" Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Science is about resolving paradoxes. The only way we can do so is by trusting in the evidence. The reason we have paradoxes is because our intuition of what is real is vastly inferior to the creative imaginations of the mind God which created reality! (Isa 55:8,9) The vast chasm which separates Jehovah's thinking, from our thinking can never be bridged. This means humans WILL ALWAYS FIND SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES COUNTER-INTUITIVE. There will never be a case where humans see a natural phenomenon, and guess - in the absence of empirical data - correctly about its fundamental realities. We will always be surprised when we learn the truth. Jehovah has designed it that way! Hence:

The 'paradox' is only a conflict between reality and your feeling of what reality 'ought to be.'
" Richard P Feynman

Meaning we only make scientific progress when our initial intuitions are falsified, not verified:

Progress in science comes when experiments contradict theory
Richard P Feynman

That alone, should tell you that Einstein's intuitions about space and time could never have been correct - because they were made in the absence of empirical data! ONLY after the experiments have been done and data collected do "bold guesses" as Newton put it, about what is happening result in scientific discoveries. Do you see the difference between Newton's development of his theory of gravity and Einstein's? Newton had the benefit of experimental and observational geniuses, like Tycho Brahe, Kepler, and Galileo. These individuals compiled vast amounts of data, laying the ground for the fertile genius of Newton - himself a mathematical savant. On the other hand Einstein's intuitions came before any experimentation about the quantum world - which Space is a part of! How, then, was it possible that he could have been right? IT IS NOT. And now we know why - empirically. The last stage of this Science of the Sweet Spot is reasoning on the Evidence Profiles catalogued through rigorous experiment. It is this "evident demonstration" of how the facts fit together, that we call "FAITH!" In turn faith leads us to a wholistic, big picture understanding of all of reality:

By faith we perceive that the systems of things were put in order by God’s word, so that what is seen has come into existence from things that are not visible
Heb 11:3
DIMENSIONLESS

O'Dowd's big question about why "... alpha take[s] on the value that it does?" has a two-part answer, one about what the value says about electromagnetism, atoms and life - the baryonic realm; and the second about the Inzintian realm. Having addressed the physical realm, it is to spiritual realm that we now turn. We will show why alpha HAD TO HAVE THE VALUE THAT IT DOES. We do so by examining the fact that is is a dimensionless number that is neither physical, nor mathematical - and what that signifies.

There are no units attached to this number because it is dimensionless. Dimensionless units are interesting because they are independent of any arbitrary measuring units we might use, such as meters or seconds, or grams - it's like pi. It's a kind of ratio. If an alien race was advanced enough to figure out the same science that we have, they would come up with exactly the same number for pi - and for the fine structure constant
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (2:17-2:42)

As Arvin correctly points out, alpha is not the only dimensionless number. But pi is a mathematical construct, while alpha, as we have just proven in detail determines the values of the actual building blocks of physical reality, while itself not being physical due to its quantum nature. What does that all mean? Let us take it one variable at a time. First, let's consider its DIMENSIONLESS nature. O'Dowd goes drills down on the details:

But the fact that the fine structure constant has such a convenient value isn't the weirdest thing about it! The weirdest thing is that - it's dimensionless. Imagine if you were able to send a very short message to an alien civilization. Just a handful of bits. Enough to encode one number. What number would you choose to ensure THEY knew that the message came from an intelligent species? You could try sending the various constants of nature, to demonstrate that you knew advanced physics. The problem is, most of these constants require you to choose units of measurement. Transmit, say, the value of the speed of light: 299 792 458 meters per second, and you have to explain what a meter and a second are. ... There's no way for the alien civilization to recognize these numbers without knowing our units for distance, time, mass, electric charge, etc. But the fine structure constant is unitless! It's equal to 1/137-ish for everyone in the universe. Even if you just transmit the number 137, those aliens are going to realize that something is up!
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (9:08-10:25)

How special! The first thing to correct here, is that the value of the fine structure is NOT "convenient," it is DELIBERATE - as we shall shortly prove through the second and final part of our answer to Matt's "big question." Let's see the value of constants having units, so we can appreciate what a dimensionless constant signifies:

And that's handy, for our interstellar communication. But it also tells us that something is seriously up - with the fine structure constant! Being unitless on its own, isn't something special. We can come up with all sorts of unitless values - just take the ratio between two things that have the same units. Like the ratio of the masses of the electron and the proton.... But these things don't pop up, in all these unexpected places like the fine structure constant does. So what do we make of this number that is both unitless and ubiquitous? Let's start by thinking about similarly prolific constants of nature - the ones that actually do have units. Those units tell us a lot about what those constants mean. They tell us that the constants of nature represent relationships. For instance ... the gravitational constant is the relationship between mass, distance, and gravitational force.... ... The relationship is defined by the units of the constant! But without any units, it's not immediately clear what kind of relationship the fine structure constant represents
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (10:26-11:58)

Units "tell us that the constants of nature represent relationships" between the individual components that make up the equation the constant is a part of! For instance, here is the formula for Newton's law of gravity again. I have marked out the gravitational constant in red:

F = G m1 m2 /r 2

Figure 94 - Measured from the "centers!" Dna-Dennis
Refining the "Centers" Part

Newton's great discovery - like all scientific discoveries - was a work in progress. In that sense, there is no final word on scientific progress! Whereas, he originally defined gravity as operating from the centers of the bodies involved. In reality, this has to be fine-tuned. The "centers" of the relevant structures, are good approximation of the force of gravity, but to be exacting we need to consider the actual source of the gravitational pull. This is evident in our own solar system. The planets do not have perfectly circular orbits, which would be the case if the source of the gravitational pull was their centers and the center of the Sun. Instead, they travel in elliptical orbits, which means their gravitational pull is sourced from a foci in the Sun that is - by definition - off center! I cannot stress that enough. That is the source of the elliptical orbit. Measuring from the center works well in general practice - but fails at the extremes. That is why Newton's gravitational laws fail to predict the irregular orbit of Mercury! In designing gravity, Jehovah can move the focal point, and in that way determine the shape of the resulting orbit - whether perfectly circular; or as in the case for the planets of our solar system: elliptical! Isn't science wonderful!


We can see how G serves like a decoder between the force on the left and the variables on the right. It's a conversion factor. We can see this very clearly when we consider the units of all elements of this equation - including the force. The force, F is measured in Newton's, which is defined through the kilogram (kg), meter (m), and second (s) as follows:

1N = 1 kg⋅m/s2

On the other hand, m1 and m2 are the masses of objects 1 and 2 measured in kg, and r2 is the distance between the centers of their masses measured in meters. Thus the gravitational constant 6.674×10−11 m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2 brings this all together as its units are also meters, and kilograms per second, second. Acting as a conversion factor, means this number must straddle both sides of the equation - acting as a go between. That is what a ratio is.

There are two ways in which ratios do this. They can be described by the words intra, and inter. "Intra" means within, while "inter" means between. So, inter-galactic means the area between multiple galaxies; while intra-galactic refers to an area within a single galaxy. When constant has dimensions it is referencing the ratio of the components WITHIN the equation it is a part of. However, when a constant is a dimensionless ratio it is expressing the relationship BETWEEN dimensions.


RATIO OF WHAT?

We know that the fine structure constant - or alpha, is a ratio. We also know it is responsible for defining the electromagnetic force. Lastly we know that it itself is not a physical entity, for it is a quantum reality. It is the conversion factor which God used to "reduce" the spirit to point of visibility. Thus, it is the ratio between the Inzintian dimension (or realm), and the baryonic dimensions of the Cosmos. Quantum realities as we have already seen by studying their properties such as superposition, entanglement and non-locality are among others ARE spiritual realities. That narrows the range of what values alpha could take between the spiritual realm and the physical realm as defined by carbon-based life. We will see why shortly. First, let's consider the Intellectual view of the matter:

What, then, determines the value of alpha? Well, scientists are still trying to figure this out since there is no theory that predicts it. Some believe that the value of alpha was set at the moment of the Big Bang, due to the initial conditions from quantum fluctuations. Some think that there are tiny hidden dimensions, as predicted, for example, in string theory. And that it's the geometry of these dimensions that fixes of the value fine structure - along with other fundamental constants as well. Most scientists believe there must be a way to calculate this value. We just haven't figured it out yet
" Arvin Ash - The MYSTERIOUS NUMBER that Shaped our Universe! Fine Structure Constant (12:39-13:15)

There is a lot to unpack in that quote. Most of it throw-away chaff. Let's do that quickly. We will deal with the two opening sentences last - for that is the only part of the quote that has any redeeming value.

It is obvious that the value of alpha was set before "initial conditions" because otherwise the laws of nature as determined by electromagnetism would not be constant and universal - but varying. The only way to have one universe, was for the laws governing it to be set by the time of initial conditions. That's what initial conditions, means. Moreover, we know matter, and therefore chemistry, and therefore the electromagnetic force, existed before initial conditions. Thus alpha existed before initial conditions.

We don't have to waste any time discussing "hidden dimensions," since we now know what dimensions are not a luxury, but a prerequisite to human life. "Hidden dimension" is a self-cancelling oxymoron. Dephlogisticated air. Ash is right, that the fine structure constant must be traceable to SOMETHING in the quantum dimension, otherwise it is not a ratio between two entities. However, that entity is not "geometry!"

Scientists will never figure out how to "calculate this value," because they don't know what's the other entity in the ratio! Here is O'Dowd showing the utter hopelessness of their vain, futile musings in the dark:

It's clear that the number is trying to tell us something important about the universe! And, now, more than 100 years after Sommerfeld discovered the [fine] structure constant, I'd like to tell you what it means. Except I can't. Because we still don't know! But, we at least have a few ideas
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (4:50-5:09)

Now that we have seen there is no inkling of a solution from Intellectuals, let us follow the evidence to its definitive conclusive end.

CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE PROFILE

Now we consider the evidence. I only include the quotes from O'Dowd to show that they have the means to come to the right conclusion, but stop short - due to the underlying biases of their "tribe." Below, O'Dowd speak of the evidence pointing to a "common mechanism":

So here's an idea. Perhaps, this odd little number represents a relationship between relationships. If the other constants of nature tie various physical parameters together, perhaps the fine structure constant is what ties those constants together! Think about it this way: if the constants of nature were set randomly at the Big Bang, and they were set independently to each other - then we wouldn't necessarily expect there to be any one way of combining them that's particularly special. Sure, you could always find a combo where the units cancel out, but that combo wouldn't necessarily have physical significance. The fact that this canceling gives the fine structure constant, and the fine structure constant also represents the relationship between many real, physical aspects of the universe, seems to be telling us something! It hints at a connection between the other fundamental constants. Perhaps pointing to an underlying common mechanism that set the values for the constants at the Big Bang
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (11:59-13:06)

Alpha does far more than point to the relationships between many "real, physical aspects of the universe." It points to the relationship between the Cosmos and the quantum reality that created it. Consider the following:

Finally, it could be that the fine structure constant is not a physical constant, but a mathematical one - like 'pi!' But, perhaps we haven't realized this is the case, because our mathematics - is not advanced enough yet
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (13:15-13:29)

The opposite of "physical" is not mathematical but spiritual. The opposite of physical is not "not real" as Bohr said so many years ago, but spiritual. Scientists consider every false opposite, while never pausing to give a thought to the true opposite of that which is physical - that which is spiritual. We continue:

This is all pretty speculative. But the specialness of the fine structure constant warrants speculation. And we've been speculating on the problem for a century! As this funny little number recurred again and again in our studies of the subatomic world. Back to Richard Feynman, one last time. He called the fine structure constant, 'one of the greatest ... mysteries of physics' and he poetically mused that, 'the hand of God wrote that number, and we don't how he pushed the pencil.' In other words, to build a universe, it may be that only one number needs to be decided in the beginning - and from it all other constants naturally follow! And perhaps that number was 1/137, the fine structure constant - whose value sets the rules of this particular space time
" Matt O'Dowd - Why is 1/137 One of the Greatest Unsolved Problems in Physics? (13:30-14:23)

Again, we dispense with the nonsense of spacetimes and multiple universes. And we focus on the evidence. It is indeed true that all other constants associated with quantum mechanics "follow" naturally from the unique number 1/137. Earlier Arvin Ash made the following statement:

This constant seems to turn up everywhere in physics, like [in] the quantum theory governing the electromagnetic force. Yet its value cannot currently be predicted directly from any theory
" Arvin Ash

That is a lie. The theory was pronounced long before Ash was born, long before America became an empire, and long before before Aristotle ever dreamed of ethers. Newton said it best, "We account the Scriptures of God to be the most sublime philosophy." And again, "No sciences are better attested than the religion of the Bible." The book of Isaiah was written in Jerusalem, about 732 years before our common era. In it we find the following gem:

For this is what Jehovah says, the Creator of the heavens, the true God, the One who formed the earth, its Maker who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, but formed it to be inhabited: "I am Jehovah, and there is no one else."
Isa 45:18

The proof that Jehovah had this thought before he created Christ is a higher grade explanation that has its own episode. For now we can state definitively that this "theory," or "philosophy"/"science" as Newton puts it was decreed by Jehovah BEFORE initial conditions! How do we know? Alpha, is the conversion factor that straddles the spiritual and physical realms of the universe through electromagnetism - the dividing line! It is a ratio between these two realms that connects electromagnetism to some cornerstone entity in the invisible spiritual realm. We know that that entity cannot be any "geometry" but must represent some form of energy. For it is from energy that matter is created. Having devised from the results of experimental data, his equation of E=mc2, which works in the Cosmos, Einstein boldly, and correctly guessed that that energy was "spirit." Indeed, Brian Keating's "pure energy," is the source of all the zint in the universe - all matter, whether electromagnetic or Inzintian. It should now be obvious to all that E=mc2 cannot possibly be the conversion equation between "pure energy" and zint, for the factor 'c' refers to light. That only applies to the electromagnetic Cosmos. Where did the zint that the angel's bodies are made of come from then, since the spiritual realm does not interact with light? For all zint comes from the same "pure energy."

The Holy Spirit - "pure energy" - is Jehovah's mind, as we have seen. The Bible clearly tells us, also in Isaiah that Jehovah does not change - he is always the same One. (Isa 41:4; 43:13) Moreover, he has always existed. (Ps 90:2; Re 15:3) As such one end of the ratio was already established. As soon as Jehovah decided that his "inhabited Earth" would have carbon-based life the number 1/137 was set in stone! And that happened long before initial conditions. Isaiah tells us, "He did not create [the Earth] simply for nothing...." So, that means at Genesis 1:1 when the Earth is still the only object in the Cosmos, and it is "formless and desolate," Jehovah's intentions were set in stone. The creation of the Earth was with the end goal of it being "inhabited!" That narrows down the range of alpha to one dramatic number, since both parts of the ratio are now defined. Jehovah's Spirit has always been defined. Once he decided baryonic life would be carbon-based, the strength of the electromagnetic force, and the all the other constants of nature that follow naturally from it were also set. How precise did alpha have to be?:

The constant is everywhere because it characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic force affecting charged particles such as electrons and protons. "In our everyday world, everything is either gravity or electromagnetism. And that's why alpha is so important," said Holger Müller, a physicist at the University of California at Berkeley. Because 1/137 is small, electromagnetism is weak; as a consequence, charged particles form airy atoms whose electrons orbit at a distance and easily hop away, enabling chemical bonds. On the other hand, the constant is also just big enough: Physicists have argued that if it were something like 1/138, stars wouldn’t be able to create carbon, and life as we know it wouldn’t exist
" Natalie Wolchover - The Atlantic

Again, we discount the Big Bang nonsense and focus on the data. Newton said:

Opposition to godliness is atheism in profession and idolatry in practice. Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind that it never had many professors
" Sir Isaac Newton

Not so fast Newton. You only say that because you didn't live in the dying days of Empire. In the times when an Intellectual class of credentialed, productivity hating, ideas only, no-skin-in-the-game bureaucrats took over science and speculated endlessly about metaphysical non-realities - all the while engaging in everything but, the scientific method.

Thus, not only do we know what alpha is a ratio between, but we also know that it was set before initial conditions, and that because it converts the Holy Spirit to electromagnetic based matter - it had to be 1/137!:

He is the Maker of the earth by his power
Jer 10:12

All this is encoded in the phenomenon called decoherence. But decoherence is the scientific Evidence Profile. If decoherence is part of the spiritual realm, it must have a manifestation in the Bible - a manifestation that is described in the Scriptures. And, of course, it does. Every time angels materialize they are moving from a cohered spiritual/quantum state, to a decoherent physical state. It is important to note a couple of interesting points about such decoherence. Decoherence is God's way of ensuring that no one in the baryonic realm can use the spirit realm as a "supernatural" resource. For, remember, Jehovah has given the Cosmos to mankind, but the Heavens and their quantum realities - are his! Kepler once said:

Discover the force of the skies O Men: once recognised it can be put to use
Johannes Kepler

That is the natural instinct of all men, and indeed, God intended it that way. He told us to "subject" the Earth. However, Invizible zint is out of limits for us. We are limited from gaining access to it. That is why electromagnetism is a divide between two REALMS not subsystems within a common realm. "You will look for me, but you will not find me, and where I am you cannot come," Jesus said. (Joh 7:34) Decoherence is God's way of making sure no quantum behaviour is accessible to humans in the Cosmos. Just like the "proud waves" of the sea are limited in their motions against the land, so are we in our access to the spiritual realm.

However, we said earlier that since no baryonic perpetual machine exists humans need spirituality in order to live forever. (Joh 6:63; Ga 6:8) How then can humans access this life lengthening "fountain of youth?" Through the application of reason, which is the building of faith - just as you are hopefully doing. This access is never through direct control. But only through faith in God - and his Christ! (Joh 14:1) The only caveat is that faith alone cannot save you. Our faith must be a living faith, that is backed up by "works!" (Ja 2:24-26)

Explaining the MEASUREMENT PROBLEM

Decoherence, then, is neither solution to, nor a problem. It is merely a manifestation of the limit that God has placed on baryonic access to quantum realities. The perceived "problem" with quantum measurement is that its Evidence Profile proves that it is not a physical process, but a quantum, spiritual one. That is only a problem for materialists like Robert Jastrow. Lastly we want to show the whole range of quantum behaviour in one vignette that you can always keep in your mind to remind you of how the Evidence Profiles of quantum mechanics and spirit life as realized through the angels are one and the same. For that we must turn to the renegade angels who disobeyed God in the time of Noah. They went through decoherence and lived as men. I invoke them, because their extended stay on Earth shows that when quantum realities go through decoherence they function fully as baryonic matter. Those angels had circulatory systems, digestive systems, sexual reproductive systems. Everything that a human has. This is borne out by the fact that they were able to bear children. (You know - "Middle Earth.")

You will recall that I have said repeatedly that once the evidence comes in, it all goes to one side. The side of truth. Non-local measurement updates are NOT a problem, they are just another piece of empirical evidence that the spiritual realm is REAL AND EXISTS!


WHAT THIS ALL MEANS

If you can find any other view of the world which agrees over the entire range where things have already been observed, but disagrees somewhere else, you have made a great discovery
" Richard P Feynman

Great indeed! BUT IT IS NOT A DISCOVERY! It was through revelation. Jehovah has purposed to set all matters straight at the end of days. According to that purpose, he has reserved the glory that such revelations will generate for his holy ones! The people who will be destroyed at Armageddon will - like the Egyptians who drowned in the sea - never be seen again. (Ex 14:13) Of course, in that instance, this "never" was between the Israelites and the dying Egyptians. But in the war of Armageddon, the "never," will be because, those destroyed at that time will suffer "everlasting destruction!" (2Th 1:6-9) They will not be resurrected. Therefore, the Intellectual class will be humiliated while their own system is collapsing. This is what the Bible calls "The appointed time when their foot slips," and "... the day of their disaster...." (De 32:35) It is the arrival of that day, that I am publishing to you.

As we have demonstrated repeatedly, there is no possibility for humans to intuit the secrets of the universe. For Jehovah's ways are higher than man's ways. And, just like humans are blocked from access to quantum realities, so Jehovah has decreed that the glory of of his anointed ones be reserved for them exclusively:

But we speak God's wisdom in a sacred secret, the hidden wisdom, which God foreordained before the systems of things for our glory. It is this wisdom that none of the rulers of this system of things came to know, for if they had known it, they would not have executed the glorious Lord. But just as it is written: "Eye has not seen and ear has not heard, nor have there been conceived in the heart of man the things that God has prepared for those who love him." For it is to us God has revealed them through his spirit, for the spirit searches into all things, even the deep things of God
1Co 2:7-10

Part of the inconceivable "things that God has prepared" for his holy ones is the humiliation of God hating secular Intellectuals:

For it is written: "I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectuals I will reject." Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this system of things? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish?
1Co 1:19,20

This passage of scripture shows what God has in store for Intelectuals - utter humiliation. The highlighted portion clearly shows another detail - Jehovah's "rejection" of Intellectuals, and their lies against Him will take place WHILE THEIR "SYSTEM OF THINGS" IS STILL IN PLACE! Disproving the Big Bang; the existence of black holes; spacetime, special and general relativity and their explanations of gravity; sentient AI; multiverses; evolution and many more falsehoods is going to happen on this side of Armageddon! We know that from the pointed question: "Where is the debater of this system of things?" Debaters are incompatible with Jehovah's coming system of things - where harmnoy and abundant peace will prevail and righteousness will dwell. (Ps 37:11; Pr 17:14; Ja 3:17,18; 2Pe 3:13) Hence, these events will take place before Armageddon! As I have told you thoughout this blog, Jehovah does not debate - he stores up wrath, then takes vengeance. (Na 1:2) The day of reckoning has arrived. (Jer 10:14,15) Further, all his sons share his spirit. None of us are debaters. The holy work of "overtuning reasons and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God," and of the "bringing [of] every thought into captivity to make it obedient to Christ" is part of the process of God using "the things that are not, to bring to nothing the things that are!" (2Co 10:5; 1Co 1:28)

For though we walk in the flesh, we do not wage warfare according to what we are in the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly, but powerful by God for overturning strongly entrenched things. For we are overturning reasonings and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are bringing every thought into captivity to make it obedient to the Christ; and we are prepared to inflict punishment for every disobedience, as soon as your own obedience is complete
2Co 10:3-6

And again ...

For you see his calling of you, brothers, that there are not many wise in a fleshly way, not many powerful, not many of noble birth, but God chose the foolish things of the world to put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world to put the strong things to shame; and God chose the insignificant things of the world and the things looked down on, the things that are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, so that no one might boast in the sight of God
1Co 1:26-29

This first episode of The Greatest Story Ever Told is called CREDENTIALS. Those credentials are not of the holy ones, but of thee Holy One - Jehovah of Armies! All the praise is due to him!:

You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created
Re 4:11

What follows from here, the first act of "setting matters straight" is the magnification of Jehovah's name! As first Corinthians bore witness to: Jehovah has decreed that this glorification of his name will be performed through his chosen servants, then alive at the time of the end. You have just witnessed the beginning of that unfolding prophecy. Never misunderstand the purpose of source of these revelations. The fulfillment of this prophecy - and others associated with it - is for all mankind to know who created the universe - and how. As Jehovah says prophetically:

By my own self I have sworn — out of my own mouth in righteousness the word has gone forth, so that it will not return - that to me every knee will bend down, every tongue will swear, saying, 'Surely in Jehovah there are full righteousness and strength. All those getting heated up against him will come straight to him and be ashamed
Isa 45:23,24

And its now uunfolding fulfillment ...

But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you also look down on your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God; for it is written: 'As I live,' says Jehovah, 'to me every knee will bend down, and every tongue will make open acknowledgment to God.'
Ro 14:10,11

THAT is where the long road of Evidence Profiles leads! And that is why Evidence Profiles exist - to make all mankind accountable to Jehovah for their actions. As for Intellectuals, their time is up. The time for their reckoning is here. Their final outcome - humliation and judgement - has arrived . How this all works, how it affects you directly, and why you cannot escape the consequences - will be explained on the following page.

Walk with me. Hold my hand and let me lead you. I take you on a journey and I promise I will lead you - I will lead you - until you get the full comprehension. And when you do: that's when the mission of survival becomes your every thought
" Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr