the greatest story ever told!

Jehovah Is The Master Of The Subtle Effect - GRAVITY

I once spoke to a professional curator. I asked what specifically that entailed ... and she told me its about putting an object in the best location and displaying it in the most imaginative, yet elegant way. What's the best example of that that you know I asked? "Jehovah and how he made the Earth to hang on nothing" was the reply! I had always marveled at the technical prowess behind this feat, but now I had the additional layer of the bespoke Artistry it bespeaks - about Jehovah's ability to generate beauty and awe!

The "pale blue dot" as it has been called by some hangs in empty space, yet never falls. How does it do that - physically speaking? How? After all, it's not a magic trick, since God hates magic, and he is a Worker and Creator, not a illusionist - a common trickster. (De 18:9-13) How then did he manage to pull off this greatest of all exercises in curation? A feat that he has multiplied, billions, trillions of times throughout the Cosmos.

A LOVING Father Teaches his Children

The first thing we have to note is that according to Jehovah's initial plan, mankind where to learn scientific knowledge while having a perfect relationship with our Heavenly Father. We were never supposed to be estranged from him. In keeping with this wish, Jehovah created the universe in such a way that mankind would slowly - at first - grasp scientific knowledge, and then learn to apply it in generating technology for their own conveniences. And as any proud parent does, Jehovah was interested in how his human children developed and interacted with the rest of his creation. When he gave Adam the task of naming the animals, he was interested in what names Adam came up with. Just like parents are happy to hear their children say their first words, and continue to be happy as they reach more and more advance stages of development:

But the loving preparations Jehovah made for mankind, apply even after our fall from perfection. And from his side: Jehovah does not change. (Mal 3:6a) That means Jehovah still plays this game with his faithful human children. A good parent will tell you that the secret behind helping your children to develop mentally in this way is to make the task before them difficult enough that achieving success will bring joy and a feeling of satisfaction; but not so difficult that it is beyond the capacity of the child to actually figure out the mental puzzle. You will not be surprised that this method of developing the mental skills of your children originated with the original parent - Jehovah our Grand Father! Here is the trick: you give your children a multi-variable puzzle to solve, but you also give them some of the variables and leave them to solve for the unidentified variable. It's easy to understand it once you see it at work - once you see actual examples. I will provide two - each using a different approach, to test a different part of the brain.

Example 1: LIMITING the "Proud Waves" of the Sea

The best scientific questions of all time are the ones asked by Jehovah himself. "Who can exactly number the clouds in wisdom?" he asks Job. What a question. What. A. Question. In this instance Jehovah was purposely asking questions that were beyond Job's reach to help him regain his proper perspective on life . However, in other instance, as we have said, his questioning is not rhetorical, but interactive. It is meant to elicit our deep thoughts and meditation - and subsequent answers. One example is the puzzle Jehovah gives us surrounding the waves of the sea (ocean). He wants us to figure out how he collected the waters together and blocked them from overwhelming the land again. (Ge 1:9) Here are the verses. First we establish the prevailing situation:

We understand the scenario. At first, the waters that now form the seas were covering the Earth, and God in Genesis 1:9 ordered them to be "collected together into one place" so that the dry land could appear. That means their natural position is covering (flooding) the land so that it cannot be seen. In the above scripture the Bible explains that this new phenomenon of having the seas and dry land simultaneously, is accomplished by placing the surging seawaters in "storehouses." The effect is that the seawaters are dammed up. Now, Jehovah wants us to figure out how this is done!:

Many times when non-believers come across such expressions in the Bible they imagine Jehovah accomplishes these feats through some metaphysical magic. But that can never be the case, since he is a WORKER - not a magician. Thus, there is always, always, a MECHANISM through which Jehovah effects his designs! In this case, we see that Jehovah compares the "dam" like structure he used to limit the waves of the sea - to "doors" and "bars." We are getting a clearer picture, but we still need some help in identifying how the sea is stopped from overwhelming the Earth's landmass. We get an additional clue about the timing of this development in Proverbs:

From this scripture we learn that the "decree for the sea" was established at the same time as the decree for the "foundations of the Earth" was. The footnote on the word established is: Or "decreed." So there is a connection between the foundations of the Earth, that is, the land mass, and the seas inability to re-cover the continents, with flooded water. We are getting warmer. Our next scripture defines what is meant by Jehovah establishing "the foundations of the Earth.":

So, "establishing" the Earth means defining its topography. Jehovah was deciding which places would be mountainous and which would have valleys or level ground. It was in this period of time in the development of the planet that, used to be "formless and desolate," that Jehovah set the bars, or doors of the oceans in place. (Ge 1:2) We note that according to the laws of physics, had Jehovah, not taken specific action to limit the waters from overwhelming the Earth, they would have just returned to their previous "flooded" state over the Earth. Hence, he "set a boundary that they should not pass, so that they should never again cover the Earth." That makes sense. So, whatever mechanism acts as "doors" or "bars" to contain the seawaters is a limiting boundary, meaning: it is to be found where the sea ends, and land starts. We are narrowing our search parameters. In our next scripture Jehovah helps us to figure out the puzzle by identifying the key variable we need, in order to figure out what is happening - and how:

"The sand!" That is the limiting mechanism. So, in this instance of playing with his Earthly children, Jehovah gives us a puzzle to solve, but also gives us a big clue as to its resolution. In this instance he identifies the mechanism - and leaves it up to us to figure out HOW IT WORKS! Here is the final solution! I have included the link to a simple, and excellent video tutorial that lays out the physics in clear terms. For your convenience, I include some key quotes from the video below:

The solution couldn't be simpler - or more elegant! The first thing we want to note is that our Father is trustworthy in the clues he provides us with. The mechanism that stops waves in their tracks, the proverbial "doors" and "bars" of the sea; the limiting "boundary" that contains them as if by a "dam"; the "permanent regulation that [the sea] cannot pass over," IS INDEED - "SAND!" It is an appropriate time, to quote the greatest scientist in human history:

I should tell you that the "how," of how waves work was only discovered in my lifetime. The psalms were written about 20 years shy of 2 500 years ago! But the being who inspired them, is also the same being who "decreed" how sand should cause the waves of the ocean to break and fall upon each other - and thus set an effective limit to their forward motion.

The sandbar tutorial makes an additional observation, which shows the clear difference between putting sand in the way of waves and not having it there!:

The value of this commentary is that it contrasts what happens when there's a sandbar, versus what happens on the beach - in its absence. SANDBAR: waves break. No sandbar: a channel occurs that the seawaters can use to flood that sandbar-free portion of the beach! In other words, had not Jehovah established his decree of how the sand should act as a sandbar - all seawater would have had a channel, to again overwhelm the continents!

We are done with this example. In it, the variable Jehovah gave us as a "given" was IDENTIFYING THE MECHANISM; while he left figuring out how it works to us. You remember in school that your maths teacher would always give you some free "givens" when you were trying to solve for 'X.' Otherwise, the problem was unsolvable. Jehovah does the same. I didn't go further into it, because the tutorial's explanation is sufficient for a basic understanding of the overall functionality, but ... in case you were wondering: the complex functionality of stopping waves in their tracks is just a cumulative effect of layering the simple explanation of the video, on itself - over and over again! Instead of one child, think of many small children all running behind each other in single file. When the first falls, the others behind him don't veer off to the side. He tripped on the hump of sand and fell, and they trip on him - and fall. This dynamic of reverberating a hiccup in forward movement backwards is an interesting property of the mechanics of heavy traffic flow. On the highway, in slow moving traffic, when a driver in the front puts on his breaks, it acts as a pulse that generates a longitudinal wave (the kind that work like a slinky, instead of water ripples) - that travels backwards into the cars behind him! He breaks and the car behind him breaks, forcing the third car from the pulse to also break and so on and so on. This is what happens with waves hitting a sandbar. The impact isn't just limited to the point of contact, but a wave pulse is generated that reverberates backwards - into the ocean and puts the breaks on all the yet to arrive waves. BRILLIANT! Jehovah is brilliant!

Let's now consider a situation where Jehovah provides the opposite variable and teases our brains into a different direction. Instead of identifying the mechanism and asking us to solve for its functionality; he now gives us the functionality and asks us to solve for the mechanism.

Example 2: PROVING the Sun Centered Model of the Solar System

This fantastic scripture describes in exacting detail, how the variable day and night conditions of temporal 'local' time on each and every planet orbiting a star works. Through all human history the challenge was in being able to explain this model correctly. Humans had - going on apparent observations, instead of Evidence Profiles - believed that, it is the Sun that orbits the Earth. By accurately explaining how the effect of night and day is created, Jehovah was empowering those who were willing to work out the problem, with the key information necessary - to reach the right conclusion!

As we have said before: to the eyes, the explanation of the Sun orbiting the Earth seems just as plausible - in fact more so - than the explanation that the Sun is stationary (relatively) at the center of the solar system - and it is the Earth that does the orbiting! To the eyes, these two scenarios appear equal. Only when we apply our minds can we properly resolve their differences and realize the truth. For, as Galileo put it, "Where the senses fail us, reason must step in." If the Sun moves around the Earth there is no turning necessary - of both the Earth, and of the Sun, since the Sun shines radially in all direction. So that gives us only one type of movement that has to be factored in: the orbit of the Sun. However, if the Sun is at the center of the solar system, then the Earth needs to perform two types of movements to accomplish the same effect, namely, orbiting the Sun and revolving daily on its axis to create the 24 hour cycle of night and day.

The KEY PIECE OF INFORMATION that Jehovah provided in that verse in Job, was that the functionality responsible for producing day and night operated like transforming "clay under a seal." We have explained that in detail earlier in the blog. What we want to do now, is show how that piece of information served to rule out one theory - and verify the other!

In this example the 'X' we are solving for, is which of the two mechanisms is the variation of night and day a function of - the Sun, or the Earth? By stating that the transformation is due to a revolution on an axis - which is the way "clay under a seal" works - Jehovah was making it clear, to anyone who wished to reason out the problem, which of the two possible competing theories was CORRECT. As we have said the Earth centered theory needed only one movement - an orbit. On the other hand, in addition to an orbit, the Sun centered model of the solar system required a daily revolution of the orbiting body (in our case the Earth) - ON ITS A-X-I-S!

If you assess these two competing world views, you realize that both camps agree the mechanism is orbiting a central object. An orbit is a key ingredient in both versions. Thus, there was no controversy about the need for an orbit. Everyone who sees the arc of the Sun across the sky everyday knows something is orbiting something else. The only question is which is orbiting the other? Thus, Jehovah didn't discuss the common denominator at all! Instead he highlights the distinguishing property of the correct theory - ROTATION ON AN AXIS. In this way, by giving us an accurate description of the functionality, we could solve for the identity of the MECHANISM.

In these two examples, then: waves of the ocean; and figuring out the correct model of the solar system we see how Jehovah used different approaches to teach humans important scientific lessons! But what does that have to do with "gravity" - and figuring out how it works?

Finding the MISSING COMPONENT of Gravity!

And ...

These two statements represent the great unresolved mystery Newton could not work out during the course of his life: what is the mechanism through which gravity operates? Newton's great work on the subject of gravity was so impactful when he finished it, that Edmond Halley, a prominent member of the Royal Society in England personally financed its publication, regarding it, as Stephen Hawking writes in his book On The Shoulders of Giants, as "a masterpiece and a gift to humanity." And that it certainly was.

Even so, our two quotes from Newton show the discomfort he had at identifying the mechanics without identifying the mechanism responsible for them. However, his anxiety, though justified, was misplaced. For the mechanism had long ago been identified - in the Bible! From Dan Brown I learned that you never introduce a detail or entity into your narrative in one chapter, unless you are going to use it in the next. If your character, as an example, walks into his study and puts his keys on a desk which has a gun prominently displayed on it. That gun better be part of an unfolding murder mystery in the next chapter. Never strew your narrative with unnecessary, superfluous details. Why then, did I tell you about Jehovah's way of teaching his human children about the wonders of how he created the universe? Because it is the secret formula in identifying the unknown variable behind Newton's great discovery. All the while Newton searched and searched: the answer lay in his favourite book - the Holy Bible.

Yet, even if Newton had known of and understood the scriptures I am to share with you now, he would still not have been able to fully resolve the issue as the time for that had not yet arrived - according to Jehovah's timetable. The God who "makes all his works cooperate together for the good of those who love" him - his anointed holy ones: "those who are the ones called according to his purpose!" (Ro 8:28) He gave half the solution to Newton, and the other half - to me. As for Newton:

As I say, even if Newton had found the secret in the Bible he wouldn't have known how to identify it in nature, for it is a subatomic particle! And all such discoveries were still many years ahead of his time. Besides which, Jehovah designed the secret only to be revealed now - at the end of days. In the first two examples of Jehovah's wonderful parenting abilities, I gave you two contrasting examples of him training the mental development of humans: one where he supplied the mechanism and left us to figure out the mechanics; and a second where he identifies the mechanics and leaves us to figure out the only mechanism they can be attributed to. Understanding the essence of Newton's discovery, you should be easily able to figure out which variable he gave us in the Bible - the mechanism or the mechanics?

Newton's great landmark accomplishment of course was a clear identification of the mechanics of the laws of gravitation! That only leaves one option for what we will find in the Bible: it must, through elimination, leave us with the identity of the MECHANISM! That makes sense, for that was the only smooth pebble on the seashore that Newton left undiscovered. It is to that pebble that we now turn our keen attention.

A Brief Review of Bohr's Model of the ATOM

Throughout this blog I have not given any focused attention to the atom and our understanding of it, simply because I remember it being one of the first and most basic things taught in high school physics. As such, in the back of my mind I am convinced that most people are familiar with it. I look at it as a necessary part of current life - like believing the Earth is a sphere, and the Sun is at the center of the solar system. It is something we should all be familiar with, even if the exact details may escape us.

Another reason is that Bohr's model has recently been updated. Let me give you a quick rundown of both models of the atom. Bohr's model is of course based on negatively charged electrons orbiting in their electron shells around a central nucleus, which has both positively charged protons, and neutrally charged neutrons. Superficially, this model's operation very much resembles the solar system, with the Sun in the middle representing the nucleus, and the planets representing the different electron shells and their orbiting electrons. The only major difference is that the electron shells can house more than one electron per shell (or orbiting level). The information on this is so widespread that I will leave you to Youbble it, if you need further information. Now the update.

Electrons DO NOT ORBIT - They SPIN IN PLACE

Further research into atoms has yielded rich results. Scientists have made the discovery that electrons don't orbit the nucleus, instead they spin in place. It took almost a hundred years from Bohr's proposals, but it is something to write home about. How does it work and why is is relevant to our discussion on gravity?

To whet your appetite let me give you Jehovah's identity of the missing variable. From his earlier quotes, we see that Newton was mystified about how the force of gravity could act over such large distances. He knew that whatever mechanism was responsible for the function of gravity acted over great distances. "This force" he said, "arises from some cause that penetrates as far as the centers of the Sun and planets without any diminution of its power to act." A further interesting detail was that its action was "not in proportions of the quantity of the surfaces of the particles on which it acts ... but in proportion to the quantity of solid matter." In other words it was determined by mass - not surface area. Two bowling balls of the same size. One is hollow, and the other is solid. The solid ball will have greater weight and hence gravity - because it has a greater "quantity of solid matter." This perplexed Newton for he knew that every force must have a mediating force carrier. That is, something which implements the action of the force! This is physics after all, not metaphysics. There is no abracadabra. For every effect, we must identify a cause! "That one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum WITHOUT THE MEDIATION OF ANY THING ELSE, BY AND THROUGH WHICH THEIR ACTION AND FORCE MAY BE CONVEYED FROM ONE TO ANOTHER, IS TO ME ... AN ABSURDITY," Newton declared! And with that, we can all agree. Einstein gave the problem his best shot: but fell far short of the mark. General and special relativity are not how gravity works! What we need to identify is a structure that "penetrates as far as the centers" of the bodies in question - in our present case, the Sun and the Earth. What's more, this entity must increase with the mass and not the surface area of an object. If it increased with the surface area, it would mean a ballon exerts more and more gravity as you blow it up and its surface increases. This is obviously not true. In steps Jehovah:

Newton - as always - was right about gravity. Are you upset to hear that? You should have expected as much. He is the greatest scientist to ever live for good reason. There are indeed mediating agents "by and through which" the "action and force" acting between the bodies "may be conveyed from one to another!" But Newton being right about gravity is not a reflection of his genius, but of Jehovah's! The God, who is a Worker and thus always performs his assignments in a way that is in harmony with the laws of the universe, and can be traced by later generations - if not always replicated. As Johannes Kepler said, "Science is the process of thinking God's thoughts after Him."

You will note the exact harmony between Newton's description of gravity and Jehovah's identification of its mediating mechanism. There are two points. FIRST: we need to identify a mediating mechanism. SECONDLY: said mechanism needs to penetrate to the center of the respective bodies. A pedestal, by definition is "sunk" into the object it is being attached to. The deeper it is sunk, the more secure is its resulting function. The only thing which Newton did not grasp (and this was due to the limited resolution of the tools he was working with) was the fact that the mediating force must penetrate not only to the center of the complimentary body, but to its "cornerstone!" As per Jehovah's accurate description. What could that possibly mean?

When we consider the gravitational attraction between the Earth and the Sun, if we were to calculate it according to the centers we would get an orbit of the Earth that was a perfect circle. But the orbit of the Earth is not a perfect circle - it's an ellipse! Understanding the "cornerstone" metaphor will help. In ancient times buildings were not erected according to the familiar way that we know. The foundation was not laid vertically, underground; but horizontally, and could be seen from ground level - even after the building was finished. That means a large stone was laid at the corner of the proposed structure and other smaller but still large stones were laid in a pattern from that corner outward. The rest of the structure was then built up on top of that foundation. Since, the solidness of the finished product rested in large part on the strength of the "cornerstone," such components were vital to the stability of the overall structure. In contrast, the current way of building is: lay a foundation equally across the whole proposed footprint of the building to be erected, and then build on top. In this scenario, the foundation is not visible once the building is finished. What's more, since the foundation is applied equally under the whole building - there is no "cornerstone," as such. Now let's apply our understanding to the gravity between the Sun and the Earth.

The orbit of the Earth around the Sun is not a perfect circle. Newton knew this. It had already been established by Kepler before him. How is an elliptical orbit implemented? Through a "cornerstone." Ellipses do not function based on a center, which has one point of control, but on TWO points of control called foci (the plural of one point of control called a focus). The controlling foci (pronounced with a soft 'c' that sound like an 's') of the Sun's gravitational pull on the Earth is NOT IN THE CENTER OF THE SUN - but off, to one side. That is the cornerstone. Once you identify that location, you can accurately predict the exact elliptical orbit of Earth around the Sun. Newton knew this! I want to stress that. In fact, ellipses were the impetus that started his great work and led to the publication of the laws of gravity. Halley, of whom we spoke briefly before had come from a meeting in 1684 with two other members of the Royal Society, Robert Hooke and Christopher Wren in which they debated the true nature of Kepler's laws of ellipses. In particular, they argued about the nature of the inverse square law which was responsible for regulating the orbits of the planets according to Kepler. This was true. However, no one had figured out the exact mathematical formula behind gravity. Halley went to Newton with the following question as recounted in Hawking's book: "What would be the form of a planet's orbit about the Sun if it were drawn towards the Sun by a force that varied inversely as the square of the distance." Newton's immediate reply was "It would be an ellipse." For he had already worked out the solution, but had disregarded it, as he had mislaid the proof somewhere. It was at Halley's insistence, that he again began to pursue the establishment of the proofs, that led to his laws of gravity. My point is that Newton knew all of this. What let him down was the limited exactness of the equipment of his day. When he generalized his laws of gravity for any two objects acting gravitationally toward each other, he spoke of the centers. Whereas, as Jehovah says, we must also consider the asymmetrical "cornerstone." It is for this reason that Newton's theory of gravity fails to accurately predict the orbit of Mercury! We move on.

We now know there are connecting "pedestals." We know that in addition to penetrating both bodies - thereby creating a tension between them that allows the action and force of gravity to be "conveyed from one to another" - the pedestals of gravity can be aligned with a "cornerstone" orientation, which would mean the smaller of the bodies at play, would mot orbit in a circular fashion, but in the form of an ellipse. The eccentricity of the ellipse (how egg shaped it is) depends on the location of the foci. Lastly, we know that these pedestals have a range of vast, vast distances. The force of gravity is very small compared to the other fundamental forces. Something in the range of 1039 times weaker than they are. But its range spans the entire universe. That means if there were only two planets in the whole universe, and they were at opposite ends of the universe - they would still exert a gravitational pull on each other! INCREDIBLE. But how?

UPDATING the Bohr Model of the Atom to Reflect Observations

We now turn to the updated theory of the atom to identify the pedestals which are responsible for the function of gravity in nature. We know them from the Biblical perspective, we must now identify them within the scientific landscape. The reason I said Newton was barred from identifying them in the mid 1600s, is similar to the identification of the "fine gauze" in our time. The fine gauze is an invisible entity that can only be mapped out using the latest high end equipment. When we look at the Cosmos, there is no fine gauze. Space is part of the spiritual realm and can only be detected through force of action. The sensitive equipment required to discover and map it out, has only recently come on stream. As in, the last 30 years ... from 1992 onwards. More importantly, it was not Jehovah's time for the pedestals to be discovered in Newton's time. You will understand why shortly. For now, just know that the two discoveries, the "fine gauze" and the "pedestals" are at opposite ends of the size spectrum. The "fine gauze" - Space/Heaven - is the largest structure in the universe; and the "pedestals" are among the smallest subatomic particles. Let's identify them!

In a July 7, 2021 video entitled Electrons DO NOT Spin from the YouTube channel PBS Space Time, host Matt O'Dowd made the following statements:

Thus, there is universal consensus in the scientific community, about the nature of electron spin. Do not be confused by Matt's expressions throughout this video. He seemingly contradicts himself, by saying electrons do and do not spin. What he means is they do not spin in the "classical" traditional sense of a bicycle wheel spinning around its central hub. Electrons do not spin like that around the nucleus. That is the old Bohr model, which has now been updated. They spin quantum dynamically which we will define shortly. It's amazing how much jargon scientists use. Matt has used more big words in this short video than I have used in this whole blog. Below, I will quote him, but I will only parse out what is of immediate interest to us. Do not worry about all the big words, it's just window dressing. If I don't explain something, it's because it is not important. If you are familiar with the concepts then you can just dovetail your understanding with the rest of our narrative. However, if you see that I have not dealt with some parts of his quotes, it's because that's the chaff. I will not leave anything out that is critical to your understanding of the realities we are discussing! On the other hand, I will not waste any time - or effort - explaining what amounts to flowery junk. Below he tells us that the "spin" of electrons is not a classical, but a quantum property:

That is clear enough. Realizing that the spin of electrons is not a classical, but a quantum property meant its function is much more fundamental than previously thought. The full explanation of that shortly. For now O'Dowd establishes the empirical evidence that proved why electron spin could not be a classical property. Electron spin was not like planets orbiting the Sun. It was produced in a different way! Scientists first tried to see it that way, but ran into major problems that were unsupported by the data:

Thinking of electrons as "balls of spinning charge" is the essence of Niels Bohr model of the atom. The one where the electrons orbit the nucleus, like planets orbiting the Sun. Hence, this proposed functionality was proven inconsistent with the empirical evidence and a new model of the atom began to emerge:

"Classically not describable two-valuedness" is just another way of saying this entity is not classical - but quantum in nature. That's what the fact that it cannot be described in classical baryonic terms means. Further, it was obvious that electron spin could not be explained in classical terms because it required the surface of the electrons to be "spinning faster than the speed of light." That is why Pauli rejected the idea of "associating such a classical property like rotation" with the electron. In fact, he went so far as to call it "classically non -described two-valuedness." That phrasing just reflects that you cannot fully describe quantum effects in traditional "classical" terms. For instance, you cannot explain in classical terms, how one entity can have two different values - values that are many times opposites of each other - at the same time. Such two-valuedness, like superpositions, are the domain of quantum dynamics, not classical mechanics. Next, O'Dowd proves how accumulating evidence showing that Bohr's model needed revision forced a new understanding of the model of the atom to be embraced:

Figure 92 - This is how electrons spin! Jason Hise

Putting a New Spin on Things

With the Bohr model of electron spin falling out of favour, the empirical evidence all pointed to a new dynamic for electron spin. Electrons do not spin by orbiting the nucleus, planets in the solar system style; they achieve their spin, by spinning in place. The number of turns they perform determines whether they form solid matter or not. On the left, the electron must turn 720 degrees to get back to its original configuration. I apologize for the low resolution graphics, but at the same time thank Jason Hise, for his brilliant work in illustrating what is going on. The electron needs to turn 720 degrees because a 360 degree turn leaves its attached invisible strands twisted. To untwist them an additional 360 turn is needed! See below for more details and you can also watch the video at the time stamped points.

That is clear. The spinning behaviour that we had initially interpreted in classical terms, has been revised as per the new data to its quantum equivalents. In that arena of action, the electron creates angular momentum without the need to physically orbit a central nucleus. Below, we see how the evidence through different experiments proved two things to scientists. The first is that electrons seemingly mimic classical behaviours "without rotation." The second is that electron spin is "fundamentally quantum." I have not included the experiments themselves. Their details are unnecessary to our discussion. Their conclusions are sufficient, since they were reached using the scientific method. If you would like to familiarize yourself with them. They are included in the video. Below ar the conclusions:

That highlighted portion is important. Like light being quantized, means photons can only have certain energies in the electron shells of atoms, so too electron spin can only have specific levels of spin. The importance of this will become apparent very soon! For now:

Spinors

With all its success, the Schrodinger equation proved weak in one point, it did not include the factor of spin. The relationship between the wave function and electron spin is that it is two ways of describing the same thing. A wave function is the calculation of probabilities about the position and momentum of an electron's spin. Once we try and measure those two variables, the wave function collapses. So the two concepts are very closely related. Pauli having introduced spin to the Schrodinger equation, meant that the wave function now became known as a Spinor. We spoke earlier about how the spin of electrons being a quantized quantum property meant it could only "take specific values" of spin. We will now see how that works:

THAT, in a nutshell is a spinor! Please follow along in the video to see the demonstration O'Dowd performs of the "strange rotation properties" of spinors. Try it yourself to get a firm grasp of what it means. The more relevant and powerful demonstration is the one of the cube. I have attached a similar illustration of it below, Figure 93. It is from the same person whose illustration is used in the video so you can study how it works. The takeaway is that spinors have a a specific number of spins that they must do, to return to their original position. But there are other important details to note: the amazing capacity for the cube to "rotate any number of time, with any number of ribbons attached - while never becoming tangled."

Figure 93 "Invisible strands" connect the Cosmos! Jason Hise

What are Spinors?

Since the ousting of the Bohr model, it has been realized that electron spin is not some that happens 'to' electrons, but is a fundamental property 'of' electrons. It is intrinsic behaviour. In other words, whenever you get an electron, this behaviour is also present. You can never find an electron - not acting in this fashion. Moreover, this behaviour is an intrinsic quantum property!

The fantastic thing about spinors, is that no matter how many "invisible strands" they possess, the strands never interfere with each other or get tangled together. They each twist in 720 degree rotations continually - without getting crossing each other's paths! I started with the simpler illustration above, for you to be able to more easily grasp what the functionality looked like. This illustration is to show that even with multiple "invisible strands" there is no crossing of paths.

Lastly we have the most important detail of all. You will recall that electrons are the key components of every atom in an element, substance, or finished entity. As such, they are integral to the MASS of objects! The more mass an object has, the more electrons it will have. There is a one to one direct ratio there. Now Newton said,

Summarizing Newton's statement we find the following. The cause of gravity that he has not yet identified has the following characteristics: it penetrates to the interior of the bodies it acts upon; its action is based on amount of mass available, not surface area; and this action can be "extended everywhere to immense distances. As we have stated elsewhere, long after Newton's time, the relative strengths of the four fundamental forces of nature was empirically established through rigorous experiments. The four fundamental forces are: gravity; electromagnetism; the strong nuclear force; and lastly the weak nuclear force. You can search for the 'relative strengths of the fundamental forces' on Wikipedia to see the chart. The weak nuclear force is listed as having a relative strength of 1033 ; the strong nuclear force 1038 ; the electromagnetic force 1036. Those are very large numbers indeed. You can also clearly see that these first three numbers are all in the same ball park. On the other hand, the relative strength of gravity is 1! Just ONE! No 10 to the power of any exponent! Illustrating how much weaker gravity is compared to the other forces, the scenario of a fridge magnet holding a piece of paper on a fridge is often invoked. The gravitational pull of the whole Earth is overpowered by the small weak fridge magnet. The difference in relative strengths truly is mesmerizing. But there is a second part to consider - the ranges over which such forces can act. Now the weak force has the tiny range of 10-18; the strong force similarly has a tiny range, coming in at 10-15. But electromagnetism and gravity are said to have infinite ranges. Of course, we understand, there is no such thing as an actual "infinite" entity - and these forces actually exist. So their range is not infinite, but rather spans the entire universe. So just like light will stream across the WHOLE UNIVERSE until it runs into something, so gravity can exert its force over distances covering the whole universe. As Newton said, its action: "is extended everywhere to IMMENSE DISTANCES." Indeed.

Identifying the "PEDESTALS!"

The "pedestals" must, by definition then, have the same Evidence Profile. That is: they penetrate to the internal structures of bodies; their force of action is proportional to the "quantity of solid matter"; and they extend over the whole scale of the universe. THE RIBBONS OF "INVISIBLE STRANDS" THAT EXTEND OUT FROM EACH AND EVERY ELECTRON "TO ALL OTHER POINTS IN THE UNIVERSE" ARE THE "PEDESTALS" THAT GOD TOLD US ABOUT IN THE BOOK OF JOB. THEY ARE NEWTON'S UNIDENTIFIED "[UN]ASSIGNED CAUSE TO GRAVITY!"

The quote above leads us to the last point we will make on the subject. Both Jehovah and Newton highlighted two properties of these "pedestals," they are invisible, and they are part of solid matter. They are not an effect, they are an actual mediating agent of the force of gravity. In fact they are not only part of "solid matter," but electrons dictate what solid matter is! That is what O'Dowd means when he says "The thing we call spin is a clue to the structure of matter." I have not quoted that portion of his video for you, but just to put you in the picture, scientists label electrons as fermions. Fermions are defined by their spin. Fermions are claimed to be a form of matter that creates solid matter. In other words, IT IS THE SPIN THAT DICTATES WHETHER MATTER IS SOLD,OR MASSLESS - LIKE PHOTONS. But let me not leave you in the lurch. Let me include that informative portion of O'Dowd's video. Basically scientists have labeled two groups of entities - among others - in the standard model of particles - fermions and bosons. Fermions are spinors, while bosons are vectors. The difference between them is their specific spin value - and its consequences. Fermions work on multiples of half-integers, i.e., 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 etc. On the other hand bosons are particles that have integer spins of 0, 1, 2 (whole integers). It is this difference in the amount of spin, that scientists claim makes something solid - or not. I'll let Matt explain:

Let's put it all together.

GRAVITY - How Does it All WORK?

How does this all come together to keep you from floating off your chair? As you sit reading this blog, there are trillions of electron spin ribbons emanating from you! Your ribbons are sunk into the Earth and its ribbons. And they have a continuous and mutual tug. It is the tension of that tug that we call gravity. Have you seen willow trees? Google it if you haven't. Usually they are trimmed at the bottom, but imagine their hanging leaves went all the way down to the ground and then into the ground itself to great depths. That is how you and every other physical entity is constituted. You might find it disturbing that that is the reality behind your weight, for that is what your weight represents - the cumulative tug between your ribbons and the ribbons of the Earth. As Newton laid out, Gravity is a dynamic that is a function of the proportion of "the quantity of solid matter." This is why you weigh less on the moon than on Earth - because the moon is smaller than the Earth! As a whole, the universe is filled with countless numbers of criss-crossing ribbons. That is why all objects are gravitationally attracted to all other objects. That's what O'Dowd means when he says: "So think of electrons as being connected to all other points in the universe by invisible strands."

That is the reason why gravity has a scale as large as the universe! Because, the pedestals reach across vast vast spaces of the entire universe - connecting all baryonic matter together. This is why Newton is correct and Einstein is wrong. The tug we feel through gravity is of a pull downward, and never, an acceleration upward. Have you figured out why God made the force of gravity so weak. think of he ribbons coming out of a new born babies head. Have you seen when a newborn baby's head bobs up and down as they struggle to keep it upright with their tender and weak neck muscles? What would happen if the force of gravity was greater, by even a tiny amount - say a factor of just 10? It would be disaster. Nothing would be able to move freely. As everything would be pulling on everything else with much, much more force! Escape velocity would be near impossible with our current technology. You would never see a dandelion freely floating in the wind. Jehovah, in his intelligence, made certain that the strong forces have a very limited range, and the force with a range that spans the whole universe is the weakest - by far. The exception is light, for the electromagnetic force is both strong and has a range that like gravity stretches across the whole universe. But this is for obvious reasons. How otherwise would stars have fulfilled their reason for being created: "to shine upon the earth?" (Ge 1:16,17)

As for the pedestals: do not be disturbed that there are trillions of electron ribbons emanating from the cells in your body. You do not need to interact with them. All life is like that. God creates a whole system for our benefit and support and then he endows mankind with the ability to directly experience only a small fraction of that range - the portion that is most advantageous to our enjoyment and sense of wonder - the Sweet Spot! Jehovah created the electromagnetic spectrum, but the sliver that is represented by visible light is a small section within the whole continuum. For humans to be healthy we need a veritable ecosystem of friendly bacteria to keep us healthy. You would not stop showering if your eyes could turn into electron microscopes and you could see all that bacteria crawling all over you. All of reality functions like that. God is a worker - not a magician. That means there are always CAUSES behind each effect. There is no magic. No abracadabra! Throughout all his different systems for making us happy, Jehovah creates a small perceptible range that serves as our Sweet Spot. The solar system is only about the Earth. Only Earth and Mars fall within the Habitable Zone, i.e., constitute the first heavens within our solar system. That will never change. So what are the other planets for? Remember the proverb about a clean manger versus the abundant crop that comes from the power of a bull? Producing a beneficial system requires a wide range of entities. And then within that range, you create a Sweet Spot! That's how all life is. There are over 200 million angels - but only one is the Christ. The sliver of existence that constitutes the Sweet Spot is not a bug, but a feature of intelligent design. For, there is no such thing as a Sweet System, only a Sweet Spot within wider ranging systems. Verstaan ​​jy. When it comes to gravity, that Sweet Spot is that although there are trillions of ribbons extending out from each and every one of us - and all baryonic matter, WE DO NOT SEE ANY OF THAT. We just enjoy the benefits without needing to get involved in the back office operations that produce the critical functionality.

THE NATURE OF PARADIGM SHIFTS

"NONSENSE!" you say. There are no ribbons coming out of me! No pedestals tying me down. Let us pause - to think. Cast your mind back please to our earlier section on the twin development of electricity and magnetism and how they were discovered. That was the section that dealt with the fantastic Michael Faraday! Recall that what we today call magnetic fields - because he so named them - was initially called by him: "lines of force." What were those magnetic lines of force? They were the lines that joined the north and south poles of a magnet to each other and the medium through which the magnetic force was transmitted.

For hundreds of years prior to him, people had been using iron shavings to "see" these lines without knowing what they were. It took the genius of Faraday to work it out. And work it out he did. We turn back to our old friend Kathy Joseph of the Kathy Loves Physics & History channel on YouTube, for play-by-play commentary.

Please have a look at the video because the graphics help with visualizing the dynamics of magnetic field lines. Of course, Faraday later called these magnetic "lines of force" a field because that is what a field is in mathematics - a collection of lines. Where the lines start and end, defines the field! Let's quickly review how Faraday discovered these lines. Speaking of his experiments in trying to create electricity from magnets, Joseph says:

What conclusions did Faraday come to as a result of his experiment? He realized that electricity is produced, current is created, when these lines of force are cut by a coil of wire. Kathy continues:

Thus, understanding the magnetic lines of force allowed people to grasp the invisible dynamics behind magnetism - and electric currents, and how they are generated. But Faraday's "magnetic lines of force" were not an imaginary tool of his mind that he just conjured up to help people understand magnetism. They were real. They actually existed:

DO YOU BELIEVE THIS? If you do - you also believe in the "pedestals!" If you do you not - you are truly in the dark ages, for you do not even know how your age is powered. You do not know how the device you are reading this on right now - is powered. "Sad."

"No, no ... I do believe that magnetic lines of force exist around magnets and connect their poles together. That's high school physics!" Good for you. "But what does that have to do with 'pedestals?'" I will let Faraday answer through the excellent Ms Joseph:

Your Spidey sense should be tingling! What was Faraday talking about above? What does the "plucked" field line of the electric charge produce? A wave in that field line. WHAT DOES THAT WAVE REPRESENT IN ACTUAL PHYSICAL REALITY? Remember, the video this information is taken from is entitled What is Light? How Faraday Dreamed of Electromagnetic Waves! But, you won't have to wonder long ...

So, Faraday's bold guess, was that the plucked vibrations that were created in the electric field lines WERE light! Put another way:

That was 177 years ago. Surely, since then, scientists have falsified Faraday's claims, right:

So, Faraday's bold guess - as backed by hours of repeated experiments and a truly unique mind - WAS CORRECT! The field lines not only exist, but when they are disturbed they create an electromagnetic wave which runs along their length. We call that electronic magnetic disturbance - "light." Kathy then gives us an example:

If we call the disturbance in the electric field lines "light," or "radiation," or "electromagnetic waves," (there are many synonyms), what do we call the electrical field lines themselves - other than by that proper name? One of the synonyms is the original "lines of force." Another is "ribbons/invisible strands." Here is Matt O'Dowd giving us their Evidence Profile once again:

The parts I have highlighted are critically important - as you will soon discover - because they form a unique Evidence Profile. It is these "invisible strands," then, that their originator calls - "PEDESTALS!" Science, you will agree, is not for sissies!:

From that day onward, anyone who disagreed with experimentally derived empirical facts became known as an "airhead." (That, for the comically challenged, is a joke.) Onto serious matters. What made Faraday's theories "strange?" It was not that people didn't believe that light traveled through Space. At this point in time, in early 1846, everyone still believed in the ether - including Faraday himself! (Though he had growing doubts.) Thus waves were known to propagate phenomenon, i.e. sound. And people were familiar with ripples in water propagating outward radially from the source. So, the objections are NOT about light being a wave. Look again at Sir Airy's rebuke of Faraday. What element, or variable in Faraday's proposal is he objecting to? There's only one:

It was the acceptance of "lines of force" that was controversial! If you - don't believe in "pedestals," it means the controversy still rages on (by a party of one) - 177 years after the fact has been established. "No," you say, "it is not the lines of force that I reject, but that the lines of force are THE 'pedestals.'" Well that's simple enough to resolve, because the data is in - we have the Evidence Profiles!

Remember the steps of a paradigm shift, as outlined by Schopenhauer: first ridicule; then violent opposition; third acceptance - as if there was never any doubt. As Faraday continued to experiment, as he continued to face more and more opposition for his bold idea, the more convinced he was that the evidence he was cataloguing - was correct.

Faraday REFINES the Dynamics of the "Lines of Force"

Faraday had stood in for Wheatstone on April 3rd, 1846. By the next month, he had refined his thoughts sufficiently, in a paper entitled, Thoughts on Ray-Vibrations to be able to write:

The refinement, of course, is that he threw away the ether altogether. He was already a firm believer, in the "lines of force." What is noteworthy in this excerpt is that he reaffirms that lines of force "ARE KNOWN TO CONNECT PARTICLES AND ALSO MASSES OF MATTER TOGETHER." That is what interests us. For Jehovah says it is from these "connections" that gravity emanates! Of course, as promised, we will not rely on mere statements as proof - but on Evidence Profiles. Here they are! Let's start with Charles-Augustin de Coulomb. Speaking of his discoveries in magnetism and electric charge, his Wikipedia page says:

We take two points from the above. First, the portion I have highlighted should make you hair stand up. The second, is that the same relationship exists with both electric charges and magnetic poles. Why do you think that is? The highlighted portion may not be instantly recognizable to you. Below is a subsequent report Coulomb published in which he wrote it in more familiar terms. I will quote the material as reported by Wikipedia. As you read it, think of what we're discussing - and also what other theory this Evidence Profile reminds you of. Again, I will highlight what is relevant to us:

Let me reveal the sister law below, as per Wikipedia:

Have you compared the highlighted portions? Please do, if you have not already. One description uses "quantities" another uses "masses." One uses "distance between the spheres," the other says, "distance between their centers." Of course, these are synonyms. It should be obvious to you that these statements are equivalent - with the exception that one is speaking of electric charges and magnetism, while the other refers to gravity:

Because gravity and electric charge have vastly different ranges, they have dave different constants. But Jehovah fixed the constants, so that the manifestation of both forces follows the exact same form! This is like how runners on an oval track have staggered starting positions to compensate for the curve of the track. Or how Usain Bolt gives Kevin Hart a 90 meter head start when they race each other in the 100 meters. Additionally, we bring back O'Dowd's words:

Let us leave the "invisible strands" part alone for just a moment. What is their purpose, as per O'Dowd? To connect the electron "to all other points in the universe." That is what the empirical record shows about electrons. Now look at Wikipedia's description of Newton's law again (three quotes back). Look at the first part of the quote. The portion that is not highlighted - and spot the Evidence Profile. We can do one better. Wikipedia provides an updated definition of the law of gravity in today's language:

Newton knew that it was an "absurdity" that gravitation could allow that "... one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another." Newton was a scientist, not a magician - and he knew that his God was a worker, not a magician. His only regret was that he didn't discover and assign "a cause to gravity." But from his researches, he also knew how it acted. For instance, he knew that "this force arises from some cause that penetrates as fas as the centers" and that its "action is extended everywhere to immense distances...." The great man concluded:

Unlike the Intellectuals of our day, Newton refused to speculate, in the absence of experimental evidence, as to what the cause of gravity might be. Another excerpt from the Wikipedia page on the law of universal gravitation:

As Wikipedia point out, Newton thought guessing without experimental data was bad science. He figured out the laws. Now we know the "Agent." From Newton: "Every point mass attracts every other point mass." From O'Dowd, "Electrons are connected to all other points." Newton's missing mediating mechanism for the force of gravity was a quantum particle - the ribbons that extend from electrons in all directions and have a range that spans the entire universe. It is these ribbons or lines of force that get disturbed when an electron is moves. That disturbance is in the form of an electromagnetic wave that self propagates throughout Space. As Kathy Joseph says, a "vibrating electric charge, simultaneously creates a plucked magnetic wave." And this back-and-forth yoyos continuously - propelling the wave/photon throughout the universe at the speed that all such waves travel at: 299 792 485 meters per second. And that is what light is. It is interesting to also note that, although he did not know the identity of the Agent of gravity, and refused to speculated free of data, the clues he left behind fit the exact profile of what we now know! He defined three properties about this yet undetected Agent: 1) It was a "cause hitherto unknown" 2) It was "fundamental" and 3) It applied to all nature! In order, those clues relate to 1) Quantum mechanics, 2) Quantum particles being fundamental to atoms, and 3) The electromagnetic force as propagated by its electric "lines of force" also now known as its "pedestals" is indeed responsible for all of baryonic "NATURE." This will be discussed in greater detail later.

Here are the two formulas: one Newton's, the other Coulomb's:

F = G m1 m2 /r 2

F = K q1 q2 /r 2

Where, G and K are the gravitational and Coulomb constants respectively, m1 and m2 represent the two bodies under gravitational attraction, and q1 and q2 represent the two magnitudes of the charges under consideration. In both cases r 2 represents the distance.

Notwithstanding the different values for their constants, the reason the two laws have identical formulations is because they are using the same mechanism to create different functions - since both forces propagate along the electrical lines of force. As Faraday said, such lines, for both electricity and magnetism are always there. Regardless of whether they are visible to us or not. Newton died in 1726. Coulomb was born a decade later on June 14th, 1736. Had Coulomb come first, and Newton second, he would not hae failed to see the similarity between the laws - and deduce a fundamental connection. He would not only have discovered the laws but also the cause of their agency!

Clarifying Minor Details

Wikipedia referred to Netwon's law of gravity as the "first great unification, as it marked the unification of the previously described phenomena of gravity on Earth with known astronomical behaviours." But there is, a yet, deeper level of unification. For, due the reasons we have discussed above, we realize that gravity is not a STANDALONE force. Since it share the same mechanism with other forces, at the most fundamental level - it needs to be combined with them. This means, not only are electricity and magnetism united into one force, Electromagnetism, but, since gravity's pedestals are the "lines of force" that the electromagnetic force travels through, this force is in turn united with gravity, so that it's proper and full name is: Gravitational-Electro-Magnetism!

To that we can now add gravity - unification indeed! Updating Hank's statement, we can say: "There are three aspects to the gravitationalelectromagnetic force. Gravitation, which is the universal law of how bodies attract each other through pedestals - electric lines of force - that emanate from electrons and connect to every point in the universe. Electric force, which uses electric lines of force to convey electric charge from one charged particle to another. And magnetic force, which uses magnetic lines of force to convey charges between the north and south poles of magnets." It is important to note that magnetic lines of force work only on magnetic substances and special elements that can be magnetized, like iron - through a process called "ferromagnetism." While electric lines of force affect all substances, even if they appear neutral. Lastly, we repeat for emphasis, the most important fact about electric lines of force: Faraday put it this way, "Two bodies, A [and] B, distant from each other and under mutual action, and therefore CONNECTED by lines of force." What does that mean? It is the opposite of the concept of "action from a distance" which Newton hated so much. That is, the fact that two bodies separated by large distances can have an effect on each other WITHOUT "the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another." Newton called this idea an "absurdity!" And absurd it is! No. As Faraday stated, whenever separated "classical" bodies share "mutual action" without any obvious visible physical mediating mechanism, it is because they are "CONNECTED BY LINES OF FORCE." That is why in Faraday's statement, there is a "therefore," between "mutual action" and "connected lines of force."" In other words: the first condition is a function, of the second one! And that, in a nutshell is how the incredible three-way unified force of gravitaionalelectromagnetism - works.

SAME Force DIFFERENT Effects - How?

Let's answer some questions that might pop into your head. If light and gravity are both different aspects of the same force why does light propagate at the a fixed speed, but gravity is instantaneous? It is due to the different dynamics involved. Light travels through the vacuums of Space - the voids and hollow part of the halos - along the lines of force as a wave. At 299 792 485 m/s, it takes it just over 8 minutes to go from the Sun to Earth. On the other hand there is a constant and continual tension in the lines of force that connect two bodies to each other - and to every other body in the universe. It is due to this constant tension that gravity is instant. In this case, the lines of force are like the rope in tug of war - always under tension!

Why aren't Gravitational Lines of Force Visible? - They ARE!

If the lines of force of magnetism are visible through iron shavings, why can't we see the lines of force of gravity? You can - no iron shavings necessary! Think again of Kathy's illustration of light coming from the Sun and reflecting off a flower. What's happening there? An electron from the Sun causes a disturbance in the Sun's lines of force. The resulting disturbance in the Sun's lines of force cause a wave to travel from the Sun towards Earth along its lines of force. This electromagnetic wave finally reaches Earth after about 8 minutes. Those particular lines of force cross the path of a red rose. This quanta of incoming energy causes electrons in the flower to jump. This in turn creates a secondary pulse, now in the lines of force emanating from the lines of force of the flower - not the Sun! Some of the lines of force that are coming from that flower, the "invisible strands" as O'Dowd called them, that are radiating outward in all directions and "being connected to all other points in the universe" go directly into your eye. Some of them hit your chest. You don't "see" those ones. Some point downward to the Earth, you don't see those ones also. Some go through your forehead - you don't "see" them! But some, some of these ribbons, go through the pupil of your eye, and hit the back of your retina. The optic nerves then transmit this incoming photon traveling as a disturbance on a electric line of force - as upside down electrical signals that your brain decodes into a right side up image of a red flower! So, while it is true that we cannot "see" individual photons, because they are invisible quantum particles, nor can we see the actual lines of force - for the same reason. The fact that we have vision and can "see" is proof that both exist - as photons use gravitational lines of force, or the pedestals, to propagate through the universe: for, light IS a disturbance of the gravitationalelectromagnetic force!

The difference between the photons that traveled to Earth on the Sun's lines of force versus the ones that traveled to into our eyes through the flower's lines of force is called "reflection." Which lines of force in the flower are chosen to carry the initial wave through to your eye is dependent on the angle of incidence. Angle of incidence represents, which angle the participating lines of force are in. The angle of incidence relates to the angle of the Sun's original line of force. Angle of reflection relates to which line of force from the flower was at the correspondingly correct angle to relay the new photon, of the subsequent electromagnetic disturbance - into your eye. It's that simple.

Why Light Travels in STRAIGHT LINES

Now, though, we ask again, why can't we "see" the gravitational lines of force? If that question is still on your mind, you've missed the point of the last two paragraphs! SEEING is "seeing" them. The electromagnetic lines of force, and the gravitational lines of force ARE ONE AND THE SAME THING! Light travels as a wave along the gravitationalelectromagnetic, GEM, lines of force! This is why light travels in straight lines, because as we have said, the tug of war between connected bodies creates a taught tension that means that all the connecting lines of force are pulled straight. It is on these straight gravitational lines of force that light travels - and fills the universe. It fills the universe, because these pedestals themselves fill the universe. Speaking of Newton's law of gravity, Wikipedia says:

What that is saying is that gravitational attraction functions by connecting all point masses in the universe, by a "force acting along the line[s]" which connects one point to another. This is exactly what O'Dowd said about the invisible "ribbons" emanating from every electron. Ribbons that we have now identified as the "pedestals" of Jehovah, through their unique Evidence Profile:

"Every point mass attracts every other point mass" through the "invisible strands" of electrons that connect them to "all other points in the universe." Those connecting strands are the pedestals! Do you as a person have these pedestals coming out of you in all directions? If you did NOT have them - NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO SEE YOU. For the photons that bounce off you from light sources, do so following your personal lines of force. If there were no electromagnetic disturbances coming from your lines of force temporarily, no one we see you for as long as that moment lasted. This is in fact, why stars twinkle. The light traveling along their lines of force comes across a dust particle in space and the photons get absorbed on their way to us. That lost transmission causes a break in the otherwise continuous flow of photon energy along the original stars "invisible strands," also known as "ribbons," "pedestals," lines of force and electric fields. So light is a GEM wave!

A Key DIFFERENCE

The electric force can be both attractive AND repulsive. The gravitational force is always attractive!

Range

Of the four fundamental forces: gravity; electromagnetic; strong nuclear; and the weak nuclear force, only gravity and the electromagnetic force (light) - have an infinite range! Why? Again, because they use the same mechanism as the "mediating agent" that conveys their force - the lines of force that emanate from all electrons and then connect "to all other points in the universe" as Matt O'Dowd put it. I can't really think of any more general Q&A's. You'll ask me when you see me.

Jehovah's use of common elements or mechanisms to create the universe is legendary, think of the golden ratio in forming the patterns of nature. For this reason, many times when forces that are initially thought of as being separate and distinct - because they produce seemingly unrelated dynamics - are researched to their most fundamental levels, they are found to have a common underlying reality. This was the case with electricity and magnetism. And this is the case with electricity, magnetism AND gravity! Here is a wise man of science explaining why unification of separate theories is inevitable:

Everything is founded on the same basic and elegant principles. It is for that reason that:

Remember my conversation with the lady who was a master curator? Her favourite curation project was Jehovah hanging the Earth upon nothing. How did he do that? By hanging the Earth on EVERYTHING! If that doesn't bring a smile to your face, I don't know what will. Jehovah Most Precious: the loving God who worked passionately and s-k-i-l-l-f-u-l-l-y! for six incredible creative days to bring into existence everything we see - and don't see. The God of loyal love, who made sure there was a Sweet Spot in every creative endeavour he undertook - and then placed man right in the middle of all those nested Sweet Spots! Jehovah Most Precious. Praise to the Father of the Celestial Lights - the God who has made everything pretty - in its own time! From His light we see light and are enlightened. The Master timekeeper who is "setting all matters straight" as the End of Days enters its final and most terrifying stage! Do you not fear Him? Are you not in awe of the Creator of the universe? Jehovah of Armies is his wonderful name.

Before we onto our next subject, let us take the time to list the new and actual names of the entities we have realized where incorrectly labeled. I am doing this from memory, so I hope the list is a full one. (You will remind me of any I might have missed.)

1. Inzintian Lensing

   • The bending of light in outer Space is a function of the Inzintian halos that are surrounding the galaxies - not the baryonic matter, that is inside them. Thus, the proper name for the effect that proves the existence of Invisible Zint is: Inzintian Lensing! NOT GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

   • The fact that Space, or Heaven can bend light in this way establishes it as a medium. For in a vacuum light travels straight, and at 299 792 458 meters per second. But in a medium, it travels at less than this speed since it changes direction. All baryonic directional changes require a change in velocity. Since the speed of light in a vacuum is the speed limit, it is obvious the change in speed due to entering a medium, must induce a slower speed than the maximum. Thus, all calculations of the size and age of the universe are wrong, because they are based on one figure 299 792 458 m/s. But light travels at more than speed through interstellar Space - as evidenced by its being bent by Inzintian Lensing. This is another way in which, the ether of spacetime with its 'geodesics' has fooled physicists into believing metaphysical rubbish.

2. Zulucology

   • "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth." That's Genesis 1:1. One of the greatest sentences in all literature, together with phrases like "God is Love." In the Zulu language it reads: "Ekuqaleni uNkulunkulu wadala amazulu nomhlaba." Amazulu, means Heavens!

   • The name Cosmology is insufficient to describe the functions it entails, for the Cosmos are only one of two realms of the universe. What's more it disregards the more important of the two realms, for as Hebrews 11:3 puts it: "... What is seen has come into existence from things that are not visible." That is, the Cosmos are a product of the Invisible Heavens. Additionally, everything we have learned about the universe, scientifically, we have learned by studying light from the Heavens. Thus, the study of the Heavens cannot properly be referenced by a purely baryonic label - the Cosmos. Instead, it must incorporate the Heavens as its essence.

   • Hence the study of the Heavens will now be known as Zulucology.

3. Light - or The MUMBR

   • Again, the astronomers had previously failed to recognize the second realm of the universe - despite the fact that they have been staring at its empirical evidence for more than a half-century! Nonetheless, the name Cosmic Micowave Background or CMB is most inappropriate, because Light IS THE PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE SECOND REALM!

   • This is the ultimate example of "dephlogisticated" air: that is, naming the proof for a totally new understanding of the world according to your old, evidence-free model of thinking!

   • Additionally, in following the evidence all the way to a solid conclusion, we realized that the MUMBR is actually the Evidence Profile for "Light" that Jehovah created at "initial conditions!" Thus, CMB is out. And Light and the MUMBR are in!

4. Universal Fine Gauze - or Heaven

   • The discoverer of a new entity or facet of reality in Science is the one who gets to name it. Thus, Lavoisier named "dephlogisticated" air - "Oxygen." This is not controversial. Since Jehovah identified what has been, upto now, known scientifically - as the Cosmic Web - more than 2 500 years ago, it is only correct to give it the names he himself calls it by - especially so, since it is his home!

   • Thus, the one-piece structure that spans the whole universe - and in fact, gives it, its dimensions is henceforth known as Heaven. Not as the once again, limited-to-one-realm-name physicists give to entities of nature due to their using the wrong model of nature to study reality. There is no such thing as a Cosmic Web. Indeed, Heaven is not part of the Cosmos! And that's the point! That's a new more appropriate name is necessary: HEAVEN!

5. Invisible Zint

   • We covered this in detail. So called Dark Matter is not "dark," nor is it "matter." Other than that, perfect score. For reasons we have already discussed in detail, its proper name is: Invisible Zint!

6. Zint

   • Both realms of the universe have creatures with bodies. That means these entities are made up of "something." We can not call the "something" of Heavenly existence - matter, since that would confuse the issue. So, we label it with another word that gives the same essential meaning of something, rather than, nothing. We call it ZINT! Thus, we get baryonic matter in the Cosmos; and Invisible Zint, in Space. Space, itself, is another entity made from Invisible Zint.

7. Materializing

   • Decoherence, while still being a relevant term, is much more easily understood through the term: "materialize." Thus, that will be the defacto name for this quantum property.

   • Thus, the one-piece structure that spans the whole universe - and in fact, gives it, its dimensions is henceforth known as Heaven. Not as the once again, limited-to-one-realm-name physicists give to entities of nature due to their using the wrong model of nature to study reality. There is no such thing as a Cosmic Web. Indeed, Heaven is not part of the Cosmos! And that's the point! That's a new more appropriate name is necessary: HEAVEN!

8. Spirics

   • Since Physics deals with how things function in the Cosmos - in the physical realm. And things also have a different way of functioning in the spiritual realm - we cannot also refer to those dynamics as a part of Physics. Thus, we designate the word Spirics to describe them - in honour of Rudolf Clausius!

9. Supernatural

   • Supernatural used to mean occult, or it was associated with magic. That has now been debunked. Since the spiritual realm operates on a zero entropy basis, it can perform functions that are above the capacity of baryonic matter. The catalogue of realities that are possible in the baryonic realm of the universe are called nature. The catalogue of realities that are native to the spiritual realm of the universe are called supernatural! Nature relates to baryonic matter; and supernature, relates to Invisible Zint!

10. Pedestals

    • The "invisible strands" that are the fundamental, quantum mechanical structures of Spinors, that give matter its properties. These invisible strands emanate from electrons and go outwards to the whole universe. They have a range as large as the universe itself. It is these structures, that Jehovah uses as the mediating mechanism, for the force of gravity! They are what connects independent bodies to each other, through gravity! Just like the elliptical orbits of the planets were a great simplification of the grotesque epicycles of geocentrism, so pedestals are an elegant replacement for the metaphysical madness of non-existent spacetime!

I will keep updating this section as more and more definitions that reflect reality of the universe being made of two, and not one realm - become apparent.

Next: we resolve the sometimes confusing reality behind Quantum Mechanics