the greatest story ever told!

UNDERSTANDING Space

After everything we have discussed, it is now obviously clear what the difference between fact based Science and data-less ether modeled Scientism is? Evidence Profiles. Copernicus did not formulate heliocentric theory of the solar system based on any new data. He just reasoned on the current data and understood that it could be interpreted in a different way. His theory would have to wait for data before its Evidence Profile could be compiled and verified. So in the absence of data, even a correct assumption cannot be verified as there are no empirical facts upon which to establish its Evidence Profile! That is important to note.

Outside of data, the correct understanding of a natural phenomenon and its incorrect modeling ARE BOTH EQUALLY VALID, SINCE BOTH ARE ONLY BASED ON HOW THINGS LOOK - AND NOT ON HOW THEY ACTUALLY ARE. This is the greatest tool in the etherist's bag of tricks. It has to be said too that etherists are not always charlatans, many times they are earnest believers in the wrong model that they espouse. The sincere, but utterly wrong Joseph Priestley comes to mind. Whether earnestly misguided, or malevolently suppressing the truth, etherists need an absence of data and evidence for their model to be accepted and popularized.

This is because, in the absence of evidence, both the correct understanding and the incorrect notions of a subject seem equally likely! You will not be surprised to learn that under such circumstances, it is the false narrative that wins out. The reason is because in the absence of evidence, judgment is based mostly on how things appear. Looking back at thousands of years of scientific discovery we now realize that, that "how things appear" is ALWAYS a conflation of two or more separate realities. Only evidence, intelligently gathered and formed into a coherent picture allows us to resolve these separate realities into their individual identities and come to understand what is really going on. Only thereafter, can we form an irrefutable Evidence Profile! Take the case of heliocentrism versus geocentrism. In the absence of evidence, both explanations describe what we 'see' satisfactorily. In fact, the geocentric belief that the Earth is in the middle seems more plausible, because that is what agrees with our senses! And that's the key. That is why the false notion always wins out: because it is the one that feels intuitively right!

The difference between these two models of our solar system is that explaining the effects that we see with our eyes is more complicated when the Sun is in the middle than when the Earth is the central object. In the scenario where the Earth is at the center, nothing more is needed - we can all see the Sun traveling across the sky ... everyday! However, to create the same visual effect with a Sun centered model requires the Earth, to not only orbit the Sun, but to also rotate each day on its own axis and thus creating the 24 hour cycle of day and night. Unlike the universal agreement you would get when you ask the question have you seen the Sun traveling across the sky? The question, have you felt the Earth moving in its daily rotation and yearly orbit? would not garner the opposite reaction from most people, "the Earth does not move!" That is because the truth is counterintuitive. The universe is not a product of a human mind, but of a far far superior Divine mind. Why is that important? Is there any significance to that fact? Indeed there is:

Do you recall what Keating's three choices were for the origin of the universe? Either it was a materialistic origin story, a naturalistic origin story (those are actually two sides of the same coin - so closely related are they), OR it is the product of a MIND! The universe is the product of Jehovah's, not mankind's mind. For this reason there is no human thought about the technicalities of creation or reality, formed in the absence of data, that will match up with reality in the presence of data! You have to take the time to properly understand how significant that truth is! Here is a leading scientific light underscoring the point that Jehovah's mind operates very differently to ours. I think he was an atheist, so he labels the source of the "higher ways" that stem from Jehovah - as "nature." I have doubly highlighted the main point of his observation by both making it bold, and emphasizing its essence by capitalizing the relevant phrase:

What fails? "All philosophical intuitions!" Put another way: no thought of man about nature - in the absence of evidence - succeeds in predicting the reality of nature! None. That is humbling. While it is true that the human mind was built in such a way that it can discover and comprehend the laws of nature, that is something totally different from predicting what they are, or how they will operate. Feynman, is also the man who said the first thing a good scientist does once they have collected and viewed the accumulating evidence is to "guess" as to what the data could mean. That is why I have been careful to say that all human intuitions fail in the absence of data! Once we have data, the scientist has to guess. And then he must assess that guess against the results of experiments. This is what Galileo did, what Kepler did, what Galileo did, what Newton did, what Vera Rubin did, and what the host of other brilliant scientific minds that we have learnt about on our journey did! And yet, still, that guess must have a particular property to it - it must be COUNTER-INTUITIVE! Even with the evidence before us, humans must still thing against the grain, if they are to have any hope of cracking the code of nature. That is how much higher the ways of Jehovah are, than human ways - even the ways of the most brilliant humans. This thinking can be summarized as "thinking outside the box." So necessary is this thinking to scientific progress, that Niels Bohr gives a guiding principle stated in three different ways:

And lastly,

Here is a more honest appraisal of this reality. For the reason that truth is stranger than fiction is because Jehovah's mind is the author of truth, and human minds have authored science fiction. Every idea of humans, from Stanley Kubrick to Stan Lee pales into insignificance when compared with the works of Jehovah! Here is Einstein:

Unfortunately, this is true of Einstein himself and his conception of the ether he named "spacetime." In describing how spacetime worked, Einstein was working in the absence of data! His theory was based on "philosophical intuitions" as Feynman labeled data free scientific theories. Einstein was humble enough to state the limitations of his theories:

To put it in science speak, Einstein's theories possessed what so many of today's theories lack - falsifiability! Einstein made assumptions when he created the model of spacetime, and he was brave enough that both his assumptions and their predictions could be tested against the evidence, and proven to be false or true! This is what we are now going to do, as the evidence is in! We have the facts and we can now see how they fit together to give us an unmistakable Evidence Profile!

The Bending of Light in Space - What is it a FUNCTION of?

The evidence free theory of general relativity was bold, but because it was formed in the darkness of ignorance about the facts, it amounts to a "philosophical intuition." As such, it was always destined to fail - once the enough data had been accumulated!

In this theory, a malleable ether called spacetime becomes "curved" in the presence of large amounts of mass. It is this curvature and its effects, that we humans perceive as GRAVITY. Thus, gravity is not a force in the traditional usage of the word. Rather, it is a persistent effect! Is that true? Below, please find illustrations of what the evidence tells us, in Figures 85, 86, and 87. It comes in the form of different depictions of Gravitational Lensing. Our task is to unmask the true dynamics of what is happening in gravitational lensing. The subject is not controversial. There is no one who disputes the truthfulness of the data. What does need setting straight, is our coming to an understanding of the true dynamics behind the phenomenon of gravitational lensing.

Figure 85 The Einstein Cross: A tell-tale sign of gravitational lensing is multiple images of an object Wiki Media

We will take the next two images together! The one is an artist's illustration of an Inzintian halo of a galaxy, and the next one is an artist's impression of how gravitational lensing works. Carefully observe what so-called gravitational is a function of! You can tell, by identifying the entity at the point of the "bend."

Figure 86 - Artist's impression of dark matter distribution around the Milky Way ESO/L. Calçada

Figure 87 - Is the "bend" a baryonic, or Inzintian function?

Theory VS Practice

In theory, gravitational lensing is an effect created by the accumulation of lots of baryonic matter. But is that what is happening in practice? The answer is definitive! On the left we see the light from a distant galaxy being bent by "something" in the galaxy between us, and the original galaxy. What is the "something," as illustrated in Figure 87? It is not the galaxy. Not at all. It is the Inzintian halo cloud that is bending the red light. It is for this reason that we never see so-called gravitationally lensed images within galaxies - no matter how porous and sparsely populated the galaxy itself may be!

As we have laid out elsewhere in this blog, gravitational lensing cannot be the function of what is happening in the center of the fine gauze halos. For, if that was the case, any galaxy past a certain minimum threshold would generate gravitational lensing effects within itself. But that is not what we observe. Gravitational lensing only takes place on the periphery of galaxies, not matter how large, or small the galaxy is. If spacetime - the ubiquitous ether (redundant, I know) - where the cause of gravitational lensing, then such lensing would indeed occur inside galaxies - because that is where all the matter is. But it does not. Gravitational lensing happens at the EDGES of galaxies. Once again, it does not matter how large of small the galaxy is, as long as there is a galaxy, gravitational will happen at its edges - at the border of the galaxy, so to speak. Understanding what is going on is not difficult. We simply need to identify what is at the edge of galaxies and test whether this structure can perform the function of bending light!

Gravitational Lensing IS NOT A FUNCTION of Spacetime

According to the Tully-Fisher Relation and the excellent work done by Rubin, we know that dunkle materie or Heaven and its domed halos are at the outer edges of galaxies. It is this invisible mass that is responsible for holding galaxies together! We all remember that. The fact is important, for as Rubin discovered, the mass of stars in those outer regions of galaxies is not enough to keep those outer stars spinning as fast as they do, and within the larger galactic structure. No, instead there is a well documented and experimentally established empirical record that no only is the Invisible Zint holding the galaxies together and in place, but there is an EXACT AMOUNT. This amount varies with the galaxy in question, but the relationship between visible and invisible zint is exacting, so much so that it could be formulated into a law - the Tully-Fisher Relation! It is interesting to note that the discovery of Invisible Zint by Rubin was due to the observations that ran counter to the expectations of what weak gravitational pull at the outer extremities of galaxies. Thus, we get a situation where the function of bending light is occurring at the exact same region of galaxies where gravity is at its weakest. Yet, the bending of light is supposed to be a function of an area where gravity has a strong and powerful effect! That tells us that whatever is happening, it is not a product of the conventional wisdom on the matter. The bending of light is not a function of bending spacetime, for the light is bent precisely where spacetime is least bent - at the outer edges of galaxies. Hence, another entity is the source of the bending!

Gravitational Lensing IS A FUNCTION of HEAVEN (or Space)

By now we all know that the Inzintian halos are the domed structures that - together with the connecting filaments of the "fine gauze" - make up the one-piece universe wide entity we call Heaven - or Space! It is these invisible halos that are responsible for gravitational lensing. That is why the images of gravitational lensing are always, but always in a circular pattern, with no lensing happening inside or outside that circular ring. I have provided some examples below in Figures 88 and 89.

Figure 88 - A variation of the Einstein Cross Judy Schmidt

Dancing on the Perimeter

To the left, we all clearly see the problem with the theory that the effect known as gravitational lensing is a function of the accumulation of vast amounts of baryonic matter. In the image to our left, the lens is obviously whatever is on the circumference of this galaxy. In other words, its Inzintian halo! Contrast that with what is found in the interior of the circumference. Though, there is lots of space, we do not see any lensing effects inside the circumference. This is because the lensing effect is not a function of baryonic mass, but of Inzintian entities. Inzintian entities do not gravitate, since they are non-self-interfering, as we all accurately know.

Figure 89 - Perfect! ESA/Hubble & NASA

The Role of GEODESICS in Gravitational Lensing

Geodesics are very easy to understand. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. This is obvious. Another way to say that is that there is no short cut in a straight line. Thus, the quickest way to get between A and B is to travel in a straight line between them. To this understanding we can add an additional level, an additional variable. Think of the Earth. The longitudinal lines that join the south and north poles are straight if you are walking on the surface (of either land or sea), but since the Earth is itself curved, these straight lines form a curve. That ... is a "geodesic." A straight line that is curved because it is on a surface. When it comes to the Earth, we could imagine that a line that goes from the south to the north pole through the Earth would be even shorter than any surface longitudinal line that connects those two points. However, we cannot bore through the Earth. Hence, in practice, the shortest distance between the north and south poles is indeed any of the longitudinal lines. Einstein's claim was that this situation is similar to what occurs in spacetime. When the ether known as spacetime is not curved, i.e., free of gravity, it lines are straight, like a ruler. However, Einstein claimed, when spacetime curves due to the presence of mass, then that same previously straight line becomes a curved itself. Light he claimed will follow this geodesic. It is going straight. But because spacetime itself has now been curved, the geodesic the light follows will also be curved. I say the situation is similar to the Earth and our scenario of following the surface longitudinal lines, or boring through the Earth, because we have understood that there are no shortcuts: no wormholes that connect one region of spacetime with another - even theoretically. Thus the geodesic remains the shortest path between two points.

However, we also know that the ether called spacetime does not exist. Having identified which entity in the universe is Space, we now know that it is not an ubiquitous ether that permeates the entire universe. No. Space - the "fine gauze": is both continuous and discrete. It is continuous because it is a one-piece network of halos and connecting filaments. It is discrete because the structure of the scaffolding of the universe is a gauze! That means in addition to the halos and connecting filaments, there are vast voids! If the halos were not separated by voids, there would be no need of connecting filaments. However, the fact that spacetime and Space both don't have wormholes - in principle and practice - is where the similarities end. Spacetime is a fictional idea. Space is the scaffolding of the universe. As such, we know that geodesics don't apply to it in the way that Einstein imagined. They play no role in gravitational lensing. What do I mean?

Why Gravitational Lensing is NOT a Function of Geodesics

Let us look once again at the image of gravitational lensing in Figure 87. This time though, we will look at it with the goal of identifying how the halos of Space bend light. In Einsteins imagining, the region of continuous spacetime that was bent by the presence of massive objects eventually became straight again. Recall the image of a bowling ball in the center of a trampoline that scientists so often like to use in trying to explain the unexplainable. In such demonstrations the trampoline is heavily bent in the the center, where the bowling ball has come to rest. But as you go towards its edges, it gets straighter and straighter. Thus in Einstein's proposal, light having entered this curved region, follows a geodesic until it reaches the outer edge of the curved spacetime, whereafter it again travels in what we would call a straight line (as opposed to a geodesic). But there is a problem with this conception of the reality that is galactic lensing - Space is not a continuous ether!

Figure 90 - A supposed illustration of how so-called gravitational lensing works ESA/Hubble & NASA

Figure 91 - It's either spacetime is the scaffolding of the universe; or Space is - but not both! (Credit: AMNH)

This means the entity which is bending the light (the halo), cannot be using geodesics to do so. If that were the case, light having entered the halo would never escape. It would just keep going round and round WITHIN THE HALO. Never exiting on the other side! Do you see the point. Look again at the Arvin Ash's illustration of spacetime that has a curved region within a larger flat region. The grid lines are continuous. That is the whole purpose of spacetime being a continuous ether that exists everywhere: curved in some places (where there are celestial bodies), and flat in other areas such as deep Space - where there are no structures. In such an imaginary scenario, the path of light is indeed continuous. The geodesics are sometimes curved and sometimes un-curved. (I use that term because in both cases a geodesic is straight, as we have already explained.)

Geodesics are incompatible with the Universal Web - the scaffolding of all Cosmic matter!

The LITMUS TEST is NOT Apparent Effects but Evidence Profiles

As we have said previously, in the absence of evidence, one cannot differentiate between empty conjecture and fact. But once the evidence is in - all the facts line up on one, and only one side: the truth. BOTH spacetime and Space explain the apparent effects of gravitational lensing. But once the Evidence Profile of Space is known it becomes clear that only one explanation is the correct one. It's the difference between dephlogisticated air and oxygen! The dephlogisticated spacetime and its geodesics cannot explain the path of light that is being gravitationally lensed for the simple reason that its proposed continuous grid lines DO NOT EXIST - since Space, the scaffolding of the universe is discrete! The halos have a beginning and an end. So the flight path of the light rays cannot be a function of continuous geodesics! The answer is in the name: "Gravitational LENSING!" People who wear glasses should be familiar at least with how the concept of corrective lenses works. Our eyes have their own lenses that focus incoming light on the the right spot at the back of our eyes. When people don't have 20/20 vision, it means the lens is not functioning properly. It is not focusing the incoming light to the proper degree by bending the light rays to the required angle. This then calls for corrective lenses to act as supplementary lenses to our eyes. Optometrists are skilled at calculating the additional angle of "bend" that the incoming light must undergo to focus it at the correct spot in the back of our eyes. In assessing the power of your lenses and the manufacturing of your glasses there are NO geodesics involved. AND THAT IS EXACTLY HOW THE HALOS OF SPACE PERFORM THE SAME FUNCTION OF BENDING LIGHT SANS GEODESICS! How, then, does Space bend light?

SPACE Like Light is a M-E-D-I-U-M!

Everyone knows why glass and water can bend light. They are mediums. Light only travels in uninterrupted straight lines when it is traveling through a vacuum (or, we can say - "air"). But once it hits a medium it changes course slightly. The degree of the bend is dependent on the medium. That angle, for instance is different for water, than it is for glass! Once it exits the medium, it again travels continuously in a straight line. To the same effects, we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes. Just like Newton, so many years ago rightly concluded that the force that made apples fall on Earth, is the same force that made the planets orbit the Sun, so we conclude - based on the established Evidence Profiles - that the same dynamic that allows your glasses to bend light, is the same dynamic that allows galactic halos to similarly bend light. "The truth" Feynman elegantly declared, "always turns out to be simpler than you thought!" Indeed.

There are only two possible explanations for the ability of Space halos to bend light: either they use the temporarily bent geodesics of a continuous ether called spacetime, OR; Space can bend light because it is a medium. As always: it is the Evidence Profile that determines which is the truth. Since Space is not an ether, but a "fine gauze," its well documented - by scientists, not me - Evidence Profile conclusively tells us that Heaven bends light because it is a medium! Is that conclusion consistent with everything else we have learnt about Space? Yes. If Space were not an invisible medium, it could not act as the scaffolding of the universe. Its "ropes" Jehovah told us, hold entire constellations in place!

Having realized this property of Space we realize that it has tremendous repercussions for Einstien's gravitational theory of general relativity.

The Speed of Light is NOT CONSTANT Throughout the Universe

Of course, the central point about mediums is that they change the speed of light! Since the fine gauze of Space spans the entire universe, and all gravitationally lensed light has passed through it, it follows that scientists who have calculated the distance of far away gravitationally lensed galaxies have erred by not factoring in the degree to which light is slowed in the medium of Space. This consideration never occurred to them, for in thinking of Space as spacetime, they assumed it was a continuous ether. That means whether light is bent in a geodesic, or it is traveling in gravitation free "flat" spacetime, it is still in spacetime. As such its speed would be constant. Alas, this blunder has destined all their calculations, including about the age of the universe, to the dustbin.

How large a factor is this? Remember that scientists estimate that the entity that we have now come to understand as Space, is more than five times greater in volume than all the baryonic matter in the universe. This intricate "fine gauze" medium thus has a large impact on the average speed of light as it travels throughout the universe! But the constant speed of light is not the only casualty from understanding the Evidence Profile of Heaven/Space.

Time Dilation Goes POOF!

If you need to, please listen once again to Arvin Ash's video. Below, I provide the transcript and time stamp of the relevant portion for your convenience:

Einstein's "essential presumption" was that "light always moves AT THE SAME SPEED." There are only three variables in the formula for the speed of light: the speed; the distance; and the time it takes to cover that distance. Mistakenly making the speed constant, when you increase distance meant the variable of time had to change - downward. The only way time could compensate for light in this scenario is by becoming less of itself, by diluting itself - by slowing down. Time compensating in this way, for an imaginary constant speed of light anywhere and everywhere in the fictional spacetime throughout the universe defines time dilation. Put another way, if the speed of light truly is constant everywhere in the universe, that is, everywhere in the ether known as spacetime then the only way to explain its travel through a geodesic of spacetime is that time itself has to slow down to compensate for it traveling a further distance in the same amount of time. The argument is simple enough - there are only three variables to consider. Unfortunately for Einstein, refuting the argument is just as easy. "A single experiment can prove me wrong," he said famously. Indeed. The results from mapping the Invisible Zint throughout the universe have proven that gravitational lensing exists, and since Space is not an ether and there does not possess continuous grid lines that are curved around gravity and uncurved in empty Space. Einstein describes the difference between empty space and areas where there is gravity as the difference between the ubiquitous ether being curved or uncurved. The reality is far simpler: wherever there are a collection of objects in the universe they are surrounded by the Space in the form of halos and filaments. The bending of light under these conditions happens only within the invisible halos and not outside of its parameters. This effect has been mistakenly attributed to the presence of mass curving spacetime and thus producing geodesics locally in that region of spacetime. But this is an error of conflation. Like people mistaking the yearly orbit of the Earth around the Sun, for the Sun orbiting the Earth. The error is a common misunderstanding that is often made in the absence of data: not knowing the dynamics of cause and effect behind a phenomenon we are observing. In all cases, any intuition formed by observers under these conditions of ignorance - a lack of empirical data - will always prove to be incorrect ... once the data starts to come in. The data is in!

The real reason light sometimes travels in straight lines in outer Space and sometimes gets bent, creating gravitational lenses is that outer Space is not an ether that fills the whole universe. It doesn't exist everywhere at once. Light acts in these two different ways because it is traveling under two different circumstances - a medium and a vacuum. The medium is when light travels through the filaments and halos of the fine gauze - in which case it gets bent depending on the angle of incidence. Just like it does on earth. On the other hand, when light travels through a vacuum it travels in a straight line as has been empirically proven. The vacuum are the vast voids that exist in the one-piece universe wide entity we call Space - or Heaven. Whether light travels in a straight line, or gets bent then has got nothing to with gravity - but has everything to do with which part of the three components of the fine gauze of Space it is traveling through: the halos; the filaments; or the empty vacuum of the voids! Verstaan jy? Verstaan jy! In turn the only reason light bends in its path is due to a change in velocity. Since the speed of light is the speed limit of the Cosmos, this change in its speed cannot be an increase. Thus, light bending means it is temporarily moving slower. The Inzintian map of what scientists call dark matter (but we know better) is a large scale mapping of everywhere in the universe where light is slowed from its normal speed of 'c' - 299 792 458 m/s. This is due to it traversing Heaven or Space on its path from its parent star. This is what God meant in Genesis when he said:

And elsewhere we find evidence that it took intelligent planning to produce the effect that generates the map of Heaven/Space. This is obvious when you consider the human intuition that was crafted by the brightest minds of their day and that in the case of Aristotle lasted more than a thousand years - that all the stars were points on the Celestial Sphere. If that were the case there would be no gravitational lensing, because the lense must be BETWEEN the observer and the source of the light. If the stars were all next to each other on the Celestial Sphere mankind would never have been able to detect Space/Heaven! Do you see the difference between God's mental ways and the ignorant intuitions of mankind about the treasures of nature? The interplay between Heaven/Space and the stars had to be carefully and intelligently planned and executed to produce the desired effect! Doing so, the Bible assures was an act "loyal love" from our heavenly Father:

And ...

This is for the obvious reason that since Space/Heaven is an invisible spiritual entity, it would only be discernible to baryonic mankind through "evidence of force in motion," for "such invisible force is capable of producing visible effects," as Insight on the Scriptures volume 2 makes clear in discussing the topic: "Spirit." Who is like Jehovah my God ... in the heights above and in the Cosmos below? WHO? The Genius Creator who peppered the universe with trillions of stars and made them interact with his one-piece medium - Heaven/Space - in such a way that the light would be bent producing gravitational lensing effects that could be detected on Earth. This, in turn, allowed mankind to be able to plot the presence of an otherwise invisible entity - Space/Heaven! Meditating on Jehovah's works is the most pleasurable activity in all human pastimes. There is no one like Jehovah Most Precious anywhere - in Heaven or on Earth, in Space or in the Cosmos! Glorify Jehovah all you who love him! To the haters - your time has come! GET READY.

Setting the Matter STRAIGHT

It is time we corrected another injustice. Having come to understand that "gravitational lensing" is not a function of gravity, we must rename the phenomena. It will now be called Inzintian Lensing! this will make clear to all that Heaven/Space is a medium. The presence of large collections of objects at the same locations in the universe where Inzintian lensing takes place is a natural consequence of the fact that Heaven/Space is the scaffolding of the universe. In other words you will find matter in halos and halos around matter throughout the universe because that is one of its primary functions. And, hence, we get the Tully-Fisher Relation. The only exceptions to this rule are when God lets the constellations roam outside of the confines of their halos at designated appointed times that he calls "season[s]." This he accomplishes by "untying" the filaments of Space/Heaven temporarily as brought out in Job 38:31,32. The other exception is the one spoken of in Jude 13b, where it speaks of stars that have "no set course, for which the blackest darkness stands reserved forever." These, of course, are stars that are lost in the vast voids of the fine gauze. For the rest of the universe, the rest of the time Inzintian lensing is a constant feature. Continually reminding mankind that we are alone - and we are not alone, all at the same wonderful time. Isn't science wonderful!

CONSEQUENCES of Time Dilation Being FALSE

The debunking of time dilation as a property of the universe means NO TIME TRAVEL IS POSSIBLE IN ANY DIRECTION! It also means someone who is traveling at the speed of light in a rocket will not experience a light beam traveling next to him at twice that speed. Instead, it will be like when you are in traffic and the car beside you is moving at a similar speed. Such a person would see light traveling at his speed! This single point of clarification alone removes much of the mystery and ability to manipulate that lies behind dephlogisticated spacetime. Non productive Intellectuals are finally going to have to get real jobs. Of course, they can still try and earn a living by using their credentials to come up with ideas all day, but once the gig is up - it's up. How many people today make a living by making statues of Artemis of the Ephesians? How many by practicing alchemy? How many by practicing astrology? You might have one or two here and there, but the fall of such metaphysical beliefs renders the class of Intellectuals who run them - obsolete! That's the point, to be successful, and dominant in society, such Intellectuals cannot operate individually, but as a class. A class that, in time, becomes a money earning, ideas churning bureaucracy that exists solely for the purpose of feeding itself! That is where we are now. Hereafter - desolation:

Feet are duly "slipping." Do you still thinking you are reading a blog?

Further CONSEQUENCES of Time Dilation Being FALSE

Black Holes

There are more consequences to spacetime being falsified. Now that we understand that Space is a fine gauze and not an ether, we know empirically, that there can be no such thing as black holes. Black holes are supposed to be large objects (stars) that collapse in on themselves. As a result, the same large mass that was found in the original star is now concentrated in a much, much, much smaller collapsed volume. This bends spacetime even more. In fact so much more, that it causes gravity to be so strong that even light cannot escape! The concentration of mass inside such a black hole is so strong that it replicates the singularity that was the cause of the Big Bang. Wow. Welcome to Story Time wth Neil deGrasse Tyson (or any current Intellectual of your choice).

The problem is that blackholes are supposed to be prevalent in the center of galaxies. But from our exposition, we know that there is no Space at the center of galaxies. Space is the hollow halo that SURROUNDS galaxies, not the dephlogisticated ether of spacetime that permeates the whole universe and is thus present inside galaxies, outside galaxies and everywhere else, including being everywhere around ... and in you - right now. That's what an ether is. Since the creation of blackholes is due to the function of a mechanism that does not exist inside galaxies, the existence of blackholes is proved to be false. There are no such things as blackholes. Not now. Not ever. Next crazy idea? ...

Gravitational Waves

Going on the wrong assumption that Space is an ether called spacetime, Intellectuals have built tall Jenga towers of empty ideas - another of which, is the idea of gravitational waves. They reasoned wickedly, that since dephlogisticated spacetime exists everywhere, then a sufficiently violent event that occurs in one part of spacetime should send ripple like effects that spread out spherically through the rest of the universe. In such as case, the reasoning went, special "expensive" (wink, wink) equipment would be able to detect such gravitational waves. Of course, there are two realities standing in the way of this sad hallucination: Space is a "fine gauze" - it does not exist everywhere and thus there is no ubiquitous medium through which such waves, like the transverse waves of water ripples, can propagate through. For gravitational waves, unlike electromagnetic radiation needs a medium to travel. They cannot do so in a vacuum - as light does. That's the whole point. Gravitational waves were not an observed phenomenon that requires study, experiment and resolution: they are an act of useless imagination from Intellectuals trying to earn their keep. They were conjured up to try and prove the existence of spacetime ... since it is an ether. If spacetime was indeed an ether, then it should have produced gravitational waves in its fabric as a result of violent events in the universe. And so the idea was born. And so the funding was lobbied. The second reality that falsifies gravitational waves - even theoretically - is the fact that spiritual entities can effect baryonic matter, but baryonic matter does not have any effect on Invisible Zint. Inzintian entities are non-electromagnetic, meaning they do not interfere or interact with any fundamental, subatomic particles of nature, be they electrons, protons, neutrons - or anything else. As such, no violent event in the Cosmos, could cause an effect - any effect - in Heaven/Space! I trust that that is clear. NEXT ...

Miscellaneous Stupidity

There is no end to the foolishness of the no skin in the game Intellectual class. It is a large bureaucracy. There are many mouths to feed! "Chop, chop - I need more new ideas ... my social standing and ability to buy mocha cocha latte's with avocado on toast sandwiches is at stake." You don't have to actively think about further examples of such Intellectual idolatry (coming up with a false god, in order to carve out a living for yourself), for that would be a waste of your valuable time. All you have to do as you live out your life is put any scientific, or popular mainstream idea through the filter of the knowledge you have just gained - and see if it passes the sniff test. There are many that you are bombarded with daily. Now you know how to sort out the wheat from the chaff:

Humility decodes. Don't arrogantly pretend otherwise. Next, we honour Fotini Markopoulou, by answering her clear-headed questions.