the greatest story ever told!

5 - Salient Features of the Mighty CMB: Its HOMOGENOUS Nature

Remember how the Flat geometry of the universe placed a limit as to how much information we could get regarding the number of the objects that existed at initial condition? The unique homogeneity of the Mighty CMB breaks that limit! And, allows us to reach further evidence-backed conclusions . Here is Steinhardt explaining homogeneity's usefulness:

Paying careful attention to wording, we catch Steinhardt's bias towards cosmic evolution coming out again. In describing the fact that the Mighty CMB is "remarkably uniform, in any direction we look and wherever we look," he again mistakenly equates it with the universe. We have long ago studied, and debunked - using the excellent work of Subir Sakar - the notion that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. All the evidence is against the two pillars of the "cosmological principle." And none of the evidence is for it. Thus the cosmological principles of universal homogeneity and isotropy have proven to be false - leaving the standard model of cosmology with no legs to stand on. But that doesn't explain why a PhD professor is equating the universe with its surrounding fencing? The universe speaks for itself, and the Mighty CMB is the fencing that surrounds the whole universe at great distances, with us in the middle - it is the Celestial Sphere! No one would confuse their house with the walls that surround it! So what is the source of this unnecessary confusion?

Again, the explanation for the confusion caused by scientists referring to the Mighty CMB as "the universe" stems from their conflating of two different realities. What is true for the cosmic microwave background is not true for the universe itself. These are two different entities. So homogeneity and isotropy in the context of the Mighty CMB is an undeniable truth, backed up by empirical evidence. The same is obviously not true of the universe as a whole. For instance, the Milky Way is a disc, and not spherical. It looks different, from different angles. Further, it is filled with objects of varying sizes, shapes and temperatures! And the same is true for all the galaxies in the universe. The universe is not isotropic, nor is it homogeneous. So, while we accept Steinhardt's point about the Mighty CMB, itself, at initial condition or first approximation, being both - that is, it is perfectly uniform in both those ways; we do not go along with the falsehood that the Mighty CMB is the same as the universe. But, you might say, surely scientists realize that the cosmic microwave background and the galaxies and planets are two different things, what does it mean for them to equate the two? The answer lies in their mistaken view of what the Mighty CMB represents. Listen to the words of respected physicist Neil Turok as he utters phrases that are believed by all Big Bang Theorists as to what the Mighty CMB is:

Let's quickly pick that analysis apart. Firstly, we realize that the difference between what Steinhardt calls "first approximation" and the speckled pattern we are more familiar with as representing the Mighty CMB represent two different realities: the first, total thermal equilibrium; and the second, a core central temperature, with very slight, but present temperature fluctuations of equal value on either side of the core temperature. In other words - non-equilibrium. We have already covered that since the variations could not have come before initial condition, nor at initial condition, they must have appeared after initial condition. We know this because of the evidence that matter appeared before radiation, since it was at Critical Density with Space at initial condition. Further, we came to appreciate that this in turn meant matter came into existence in the absence of radiation, i.e., IN DARKNESS - which means while matter and radiation may trace their origins to the same ultimate energy source, their advent was independent of each other! The Big Bang Theory is the exact opposite of these facts, contrary to the evidence from the Mighty CMB itself!

It claims matter and radiation were coupled, with the tug of war between them being decided by a temperature divide, which they claim was 3000 kelvin, at initial condition. At this temperature, their claims continue, radiation decoupled from light and created the Mighty CMB. Since there was a decoupling, that means instead of them being a couple, that is one thing with two parts, now they were two different entities: radiation and matter. Of course that is inconsistent with the necessary conditions for thermal equilibrium, for reasons we have already covered in depth. You will recall that in both scenarios where light either comes from matter, or matter from light - there can be no thermal equilibrium, for the temperature of the light would be the difference, not the equal of the temperature of the matter in the first instance. And, in the second instance, if cooling radiation turned into matter at 3000 kelvin, thermal equilibrium would means all the light turned into matter at once. Any scenario where only a fraction of the light turned into matter and the rest remained light, would mean the light that remained as radiation was not at that conversion temperature - and thus not at thermal equilibrium with matter. But, that is precisely what the evidence shows. Thus there is no way to reconcile the Big Bang version of initial condition with the facts! That is one reason they think the Mighty CMB is the same thing as the universe, because it became the light, and the matter became the universe, and both divergent courses were somehow imprinted into the light signature - hence, the variations.

The second reason is that they think all the matter that exists today existed at initial condition, just in different form. They assert, that at initial condition, the matter was in the form of hot gases, and as it cooled in became stars, galaxies and us. How? For Keating and his fellow Big Bang Inflationary Theorists, matter - in the form of simple elements, like hydrogen and helium - is a downstream consequence of removing heat from radiation. And structure, is a further downstream consequence of those elementary gas particles being bonded together by gravity over vast epochs of evolutionary time into what Big Bang Theorists like to call - first generation stars. These first generation stars were supposedly composed of only light elements, i.e., hydrogen and helium. As at this point, only the first few elements in the periodic table are said to exist. From there, first generation stars live out their lives before exploding violently, seeding the universe with not only hydrogen and helium, but heavier elements, which were produced in their interiors, when the tremendous weight at their core fused the nuclei of the light elements that composed them together, creating heavier nuclei. Condense. Live. Die. Explode. Repeat. Until you get the complete periodic table. This reasoning is why people think humans are made of exploded stars. That's the theory. In this science fiction, the fluctuations in the Mighty CMB are exactly equivalent to the structures that resulted from them. And, so the Mighty CMB is the same as the universe, as the resulting structures formed in exactly the same locations where gases once were. And it is these metaphysical extrapolations: wild stories void of all truth and empirical evidence that people - even supposedly clever people - believe. I'm not making this up. It's in Turok's quote: "And these variations gave rise to galaxies and stars and ultimately us!" So, we understand the genesis of the habit among all Big Bang Theorists to equate the Mighty CMB with the universe; and why it has become conventional wisdom, for people to claim they are made of stardust.

Surprisingly, one aspect of what they say is actually true, but for totally different reasons, than those promoted by Big Bang Theorists! The variations, the fluctuations that form the speckled pattern in the current, non-equilibrium version of the Mighty CMB are indeed density variations in the composition of the universe! I will clarify the truth behind their scientific ruse, and the true nature of this incredible feature of the Mighty CMB soon enough. There are many reasons why I religiously refer to the CMB as Mighty, and the mechanics behind how the fluctuations got added to the cosmic microwave background over time , how it came to incorporate all the large scale features of the universe at scale, is one of them! An analogy of what this feature represents, is that the Mighty CMB is like the Metro Station Maps you find in big city subways (see figure 73), that tell you where you are in relation to all the other stations - allowing for a bird's eye view of the station network as a whole. Usually such maps are not to scale, but in the Mighty CMB, all this information is both recorded and - incredibly - recorded to scale! From your new understanding of Critical Density and galactic redshift, it should be obvious to you, that such information, encoded in the fluctuations, was not present at initial condition, because all the new objects only started appearing with the expansion of the universe - after initial condition! But, one thing at a time. For now we are only interested in the great significance behind the meaning of a homogeneous cosmic microwave background. So, onto the last "apparent salient feature" in our presentation.

Figure 75 A map of the New York City subway system

You Are HERE

Just like subway maps help us to know how to get around the city by orienting us to all the major landmarks, so too the Mighty CMB does the same for us - but on a universal scale!

We will present the only possible ways to represent gravitational homogeneity - for that is what the Mighty CMB was measuring at initial condition, the spatial distribution of the objects in the universe! Firstly, we clarify phrases: "gravitational homogeneity" means the force of gravity would be acting in the same way "in all directions." If there were no rules, there would be many ways to represent this, as long as the objects in question tugged at gravity in equal measure. However, we are guided by two rules: observational data, and how many objects are to be organized in Space. In other words, however we put things together, must look like how the universe looks today. We can't just line up planets in long rows like peas in a pod, or beads on a string, because that is not how the universe is arranged! Our aim is to understand, what the fact that the cosmic microwave background is remarkably homogeneous "in any direction we look and wherever we look" looks like? If you think there are endless ways in which this can be done, or at the very least, that there are many ways, your intuition would be wrong. In reality, there are only two ways to represent the object or objects populating Space at initial condition, in a uniform way "in any direction we look and wherever we look." And which of the ways is right, depends on how many objects existed at initial condition. Our guide in determining that, will be how the universe looks today. The factors work together, and either cancel each other out, or corroborate each other and establish the truth. It becomes easy to understand why, when the problem is presented visually. Since we have already dealt with that in a previous chapter, we will now just present the only logical conclusion.

There are many ways to arrange items that would satisfy the Critical Density of the universe, but there are only two ways to place items that support the homogeneity and isotropy of the Mighty CMB at initial condition. Now, of the two, we can easily confirm which one agrees with observed reality - option 2. As we proved previously, the cosmos are not homogeneous and isotropic. Looking up looks different from looking down - or from looking left and right. Planets look different to solar systems. The distribution of matter in the Milky Way, and in other galaxies is not distributed spherically, as it is in option 1, but in discs. As is plain for all to see, there are only two ways that satisfy the evidence of the Mighty CMB at initial condition. But only one that satisfies both the historical experimental evidence from the Mighty CMB and the current observational data of the structure of the universe! Thus, the data from initial condition, as captured in the Mighty CMB when taken in concert with the data of how the universe actually developed, is telling us that the Evidence Profile of the physical structure of the universe at initial condition followed pattern one! The only pattern that satisfies the requirements of both homogeneity in the early universe, and non-homogeneity in the current universe is ONE SPHERICAL object at the center of the early universe!

THE ONLY ARRANGEMENT OF OBJECTS THAT SATISFIES BOTH THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND AT "INITIAL CONDITION" & THE INHOMOGENEITY OF THE UNIVERSE AS IT IS TODAY RULES OUT MULTIPLE OBJECTS & DICTATES THAT AT INITIAL CONDITION THERE WAS ONE OBJECT - OF PROBABLE SPHERICAL SHAPE AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE AT "INITIAL CONDITION"

That looks like Illustration 19A, below. As yet, we do not know what the surface material was, so we will just represent matter as one ball of grey metal.

But, there is more. In addition to the fact that the vast, vast majority of all heavenly bodies are spheres, we have additional proof from the Mighty CMB in the form of how gravity works. Below is a quote from Kepler, which shows how spherical objects, are the only ones that can produce a radially homogeneous gravitational pull:

In other words, in this quote Kepler shows that only a sphere can pull objects from all sides equally! And that is the key feature we want, for our measuring device that recorded the gravitational field at initial condition was itself spherical. And it recorded a uniform pull from all sides - as per to Kepler's explanation! As Kepler concludes, the only shape that can produce such results is a sphere. From this information we can conclude:

WE HAVE SEEN FROM THE LAST CONCLUSION ABOVE THAT THERE WAS ONLY ONE OBJECT IN THE UNIVERSE. NOW, WE HAVE ADDED THE ADDITIONAL PROVE THAT NOT ONLY ARE TYPICAL HEAVENLY OBJECTS SPHERICAL, BUT A SPHERE IS THE ONLY SHAPE THAT PRODUCES A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD OF UNIFORM RADIAL DISTRIBUTION - AS WAS RECORDED BY THE MIGHTY CMB

We have now gone through all of Steinhardt's 5 "apparent salient features" of the Mighty CMB, and gleaned much knowledge from them. Everything we know about the universe, we have learned from light. We are now in the unique position to assimilate the knowledge we have thus far gathered, and use it, like the ancient scientific pioneers, to see if taken together, it tells us anything new.

Gathering All our FACTS Together

We can do no better than to collate all our findings about the meaning of the 5 apparent salient features of the Mighty CMB, into one list of science backed explanations! We are on a treasure hunt. And the conclusions we have garnered from the evidence that was gathered over a 100 years from various sources of celestial light, which include but are not limited to light from the early nebulae, to the standard candles of variable stars, to the detection of he Mighty CMB in the 1960s, among many other sources; together with the various light based techniques used to study them, is our blueprint. The observational and empirical guide we will use lead us to the truth about the genesis and development of the universe! All the conclusions we have drawn are like an algorithm leading to the right answer. They are the signposts that any successful theory or model of the universe must contain and account for in its explanation - an Evidence Profile for the truth behind reality! On the other hand, consider what they say about the Big Bang narrative?

We thank Professor Steinhardt, for his efforts in putting forth the problems of why the Big Bang model and its Inflationary band-aid are completely wrong. It takes a lot of humility, not to mention courage, for someone who is considered to be one of the founding fathers of a theory, to come out against it, once he sees its flaws! Such actions deserve a great deal of respect, and ought to met with universal admiration. From our own in-depth analysis, we have come to realize just why and how these theories fail.

A Final Word on the Defunct Theory of the Gaps - INFLATION THEORY

As an additional remark I include Neil Turok's assessment of Inflationary Theory from his recent interview with Keating. This quote is the answer Turok gives for why the Inflaton field has thoroughly failed as a model of the early universe, and why Inflation theory is not even a theory, but just a model "contrived to fit the data." Ouch! His critique will be split into two parts. The first, dealing with Inflation's pitfalls, and the second, dealing with the final verdict on the theory/model as a whole

First, Turok acknowledges the same fact that was earlier brought to our attention by Hossenfelder - there is no evidence, anywhere, for the Inflaton field! It is a work of pure fiction. Secondly, though it claims to be a theory based on naturalistic or materialistic processes, it fails to prove its evolutionary case. Additionally: "So, you put in the initial conditions by hand," makes it equivalent to an act of fiat, only without any supporting evidence. Thirdly, "You have to assume all kinds of things about the quantum state of the field, and so on." This shows us its true nature: it is an extrapolation that is not tied to reality, since it's principle mechanism for accomplishing its claims - the Inflaton field - doesn't actually exist! Turok's assessment? "It comes with a lot of baggage." But it's failures persist. Next Turok contrasts it with the so-called Higgs boson, which was sought as a "mechanism to explain a known fact...!" As Steinhardt repeatedly points out, Inflation theory as a model is a non-starter, because it has nothing to do with the actual initial conditions of the early universe. Its being contradicted by all the evidence from the five "apparent salient features" is definitive proof of that! Lastly, in continuing with his contrasting examples, Turok points out that the Higgs was sought out to explain "a wealth of complex processes ... all of which are measurable in accelerators and experiment." This is not the case with Inflation Theory. No one has ever measured infinite temperature, density, gravity, pressure etc... No one has ever seen a singularity. Because, it and its attendant infinite properties, do not exist. Those are just some of the pitfalls of Inflationary Theory! Now, the verdict on its scientific usefulness:

Scientism of the gaps! Sad. Here, we learn why Inflation Theory can fit the two numbers it was designed to try and explain. Because it created two parameters to accommodate fitting those numbers. Adding parameters is like adding variables. But adding new variables so you can explain certain features, is like someone who changes their story when their telling you lies. You and I like the same things. Do you like the theater? No, I prefer movies. Well I love the theater. No, me too, I love the theater. That's someone who is adding parameters to fit the data they want to match. It's easier to illustrate the concept with a social example, more than a scientific, or technical one - but in both cases, the dynamics of lying that I have just described are the essence of the practice. The litmus test for whether an additional variable or parameter is a worthwhile addition, is if it adds predictive power. Can it help your theory to explain unsolved paradoxes. Contrast two examples we have already gone through. When Maxwell added his useless parameters to the definition of how electromagnetic waves travel through empty Space, they produced null results. That's a useless and incorrect parameter! Contrast that with when the laws of thermodynamics told us that the three variables of the initial condition: matter - in the form of one or more objects; radiation - in the form of the Mighty CMB; and Space were all at zero entropy at initial condition, hence the "rather special state" of which Davies spoke. Our introducing the added parameter of the second realm of the universe, didn't produce null results, but helped to explain what was otherwise inexplicable - how a zero entropy initial condition was "inserted" into the Cosmos! That's the value of adding a parameter that is justified by the evidence.

Instead of this occurring with the Inflaton field, the opposite happens. "The problem is, they also predict ... gravitational waves ... and on that basis, they are under severe pressure now." Remember when one science commentator said, "almost everything we know about the universe we have learned from light." He was accrediting the rest of what we've learned about the universe to gravitational waves. But I amended his statement to everything we know about the universe empirically, we have learned through light, because I knew gravitational waves do not exist - as both Hossenfelder suggested earlier and now Turok insists on! (I will give definitive proof a little later.) Our immediate point is that Turok is here referring to the fact that Big Bang Theorists who believe in Inflation believe that the the fluctuations in the Mighty CMB happened at initial condition and sent shock-waves throughout the fabric of space-time. These shock-waves are what they refer to as gravitational waves. This falsehood will be debunked soon enough! The reason believers in gravitational waves are now "under sever pressure" is that no one has found gravitational waves. It is a parameter producing null results, because it relates to an unreality. Again, it rested on the shoulders of the forthright Sabine Hossenfelder to call out her colleagues. In the mid 2010s, a team published results saying they had detected gravitational waves, but their results were later called into question, and since then they have been quite, with no response to their detractors! And the pressure will keep growing with time ... until, everyone comes to the obvious, logical conclusion: the published results were always wrong - if not faked! How humiliating!

As for us, we have now reached the point where we can assimilate all our findings into one coherent list of markers to use in finally getting to the truth! Our extensive analysis has made one thing clear: the five "apparent salient features" as found in the Mighty CMB, stand in direct contrast to everything the Big Bang claims to be true! These findings are not disparate, unconnected variables. They are vital, empirical clues! Clues, to the solving of a great puzzle: "Where do we come from?" And, they work in concert with each other. In other words, only by putting all these clues together, can we get a clear understanding of what kind of theory we are looking for, in explaining the genesis and history of the development of our universe! What will the correct model of the universe look like? It will be something that incorporates, must incorporate, all aspects of what the Mighty CMB is teaching us! If we left even one of the conclusions we gained from our in-depth study of the five "apparent salient features" out, we would be chasing an incomplete version of the truth. The truth must incorporate all of them. Are you starting to see why I consistently refer to the cosmic microwave background, as the Mighty CMB?

Low Hanging Fruit!

Being this advanced in our discussion has many benefits, one of which is that it allows us to tease out hidden relationships between the different conclusions we have reached through reason. We can pick any "low hanging fruit" that will yield yet more firm conclusions from the observational data and the empirical facts! Consider what we realize when we reason on the data from cosmic redshifts in tandem with the Flat geometry of the universe throughout its history, we uncover a hidden detail about the original object or objects that were present at initial condition. The detail has to do with their POSITION IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE versus their current position. Since, the empirical evidence of both the Mighty CMB, and all the galaxies is that the universe has expanded outward, equally, in all directions from a central point, then whatever was at the center at the beginning is at the center today! This point is important enough that I will phrase it in three different ways. Here's the second: when something expands out radially, that is, in all directions from a central point, that central point remains unchanged. Lastly, I will assert the same fact, but from the opposite vantage point, just to make it extra clear: whatever is at the center of the universe today - after its radial expansion outward - was also present, and at the center at initial condition! Now, recall Steinhardt's words, which are in harmony with all observational data on the subject:

Of course, it's not a matter of using imagination. That's what the data says! Below, in Figure 76, I have included a shot of the satellite mid-operation. There used to be a short animation, but it seems they have removed it from their website. The picture will have to do for now. Although there is a 4 minute video on YouTube that shows the satellite in operation. In the image you will see the satellite satellite mapping the source of the Mighty CMB and showing our relative position to it: we are at - the center! Also, all the redshift data from galactic sources of light, show us the same thing. All the galaxies have moved away from the earth, with the farther having moved at the quickest pace away - in all directions equally, hence we are in the middle! In all cases, our position is central and more importantly stationary relative to other heavenly bodies. Of course, everything in the Cosmos moves. For instance the Sun looks to be stationary, but it itself, has an orbit around the center of the Milky Way, but relative to the other heavenly bodies in our solar system it is stationary. So when I say the earth is stationary, I do not mean not moving at all, I mean our relative position to the rest of the universe is constant - we are at the center! And our minor relative movements do not change that fact.

Figure 76 - I always represent the Earth as being in the middle of the Mighty CMB - due to all the evidence!

Again, I have to add a warning: as of yet, we do not know how many objects were at the center of the universe: one or multiple. We will only be able to discern that when we consider our last "apparent salient feature" the homogeneous nature of the Mighty CMB. Currently, we can only say we know that at the moment the Mighty CMB appeared - which we will call "initial condition" from now on - whatever objects existed, existed at the center of the cosmic microwave background. And today, we occupy that position! How do we know that? Due to Critical Density. The reasoning goes as follows.

REVERSE Engineering!

We know there was matter in the form of one or more objects at initial condition. Thus we can split the possibilities into two scenarios: the first is where the matter existed somewhere outside of the center. In such a case, all new matter would only have come into existence with the expansion of Space - to maintain Critical Density. Meaning all new objects would fall outside the spherical perimeter of the original matter because Space expanded radially outward - not inward. In this scenario, the center of the universe will always remain empty! For, any new matter that was created at the center would upset the balance of Critical Density, as you would be adding new matter to old Space. In scenario two: Whatever portion of matter, that is, whatever object or objects exist at the center of the universe, will still be found there today, as the only place that is free from the outward pushing effect, of the redshift inducing force of expanding Space is its starting point. The starting point of a sphere that extends out in all directions is its center! Thus Critical Density brings us to the peculiar conclusion that the contents of the center of a "critically dense" universe, do not change over time. If the center of the universe was empty at initial condition, it will always remain empty; and if the center was occupied by one or more objects at initial condition, that object or objects will still occupy that position today! Since there are objects at the center of the universe and in turn the Mighty CMB, because it is the Celestial Sphere, namely Earth - it means EARTH HAS ALWAYS HELD THAT POSITION AND WAS PRESENT AT INITIAL CONDITION! Let's formalize that into a conclusion:

IN A RADIALLY EXPANDING UNIVERSE OF CRITICAL DENSITY, THE ONLY AREA WHERE THE MATTER/VOLUME OF SPACE RATIO MUST STAY CONSTANT IS THE CENTER. THAT MEANS IF THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE WAS EMPTY AT INITIAL CONDITION, IT WILL BE EMPTY TODAY. BUT THE OPPOSITE IS ALSO TRUE WHATEVER OBJECT OR OBJECTS WERE PRESENT AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE AT INITIAL CONDITION WILL STILL OCCUPY THAT POSITION TODAY

SINCE EARTH IS AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE TODAY AS CORROBORATED BY GALACTIC REDSHIFT & THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND, THEN EARTH WAS ALSO AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE AT INITIAL CONDITION

Remember how I said a telltale sign of the truth is corroboration of facts? When something is true, you can come to its conclusion through multiple avenues, so let's now make the same point as above but this time by focusing on the earth as opposed to Critical Density and redshifts. We start by pointing out that had the initial location of the earth been at any other spot but the CENTER of the universe, it's current central position would mean it effectively swam against the overwhelming force of universal expansion! Scientists estimate the energy needed to expand the universe to be just about 70% of the energy content of the entire universe. They attribute the non-existent dark energy to be this amazing force, which we already know is incorrect. Dark energy, lambda, the Inflaton field, exotic negative gravity, the vacuum field, the cosmological constant - by whatever name they call it, is an ether - and ethers do not exist! The point I want to make is that all the visible material in the universe combined, i.e., the Cosmos is by this same estimate equal to less than 5% of the energy budget of the universe. So, to make the point clearly, scientists believe that the energy required to expand the universe is about 14 more than the energy it took to create the whole Cosmos! Which would make the actual force responsible for such expansion - empirically - the GREATEST FORCE in the universe! We know such a force exists, because the universe has expanded! It's just that for now this force remains unidentified. If Big Bang Theorists, then propose the initial appearance of the earth to have been at any position in the universe other than its center, they must explain how our relatively tiny planet managed to overcome the greatest force in the universe to swim upstream against its outward pushing effects, to now arrive at the center, from its original location outside that central position! This incredible soon to be identified force has the power to move huge galaxies, many times the size of our Milky Way, faster than the speed of light, but the Earth overcame this force, to move in the opposite direction! There is the odd realization, that if that were true, the Earth would be the only exception to the outward push of this mighty force. It would be the only object that moved inward, when all other planets and galaxies were being forced outward with the expansion of Space. Additionally, there would be the incredible question as to why it stopped once it got to the center, and how it knew it was at the center - so that it should stop? Obvious impossibilities! Obvious to everyone, except the empty headed Intellectuals who hate God.

The traditional rebuttal of Big Bang Theorists is that the Earth only appears to be at the center of the earth. But through homogeneity and isotropy, everywhere else in the universe enjoys the same illusion of being at the center. We have debunked those two concepts. An additional last resort is for them to claim "the universe has no center, because it is infinite." However, we have long ago showed that there is no such thing as actual infinities, and since the universe actually exists, it cannot be infinite!

Lastly. Since no force has been shown empirically to be greater than the force that caused the expansion of the universe it currently holds the title of the vaunted "pure energy" that Keating wanted to attribute to radiation. If by their own accounting, the visible realm of the universe - all matter that interacts with electromagnetism - is slightly less than 5% of the energy content of the universe, and the force that caused its expansion is 70% and non-electromagnetic, how could they attribute the title of "pure energy" to electromagnetic radiation? Since when is 5 > 70? Do you see the metaphysical nature of cosmology? It is completely unhinged from all reality. Is it not obvious to you that the universe did not expand due to light? The point of this paragraph is to make you aware of a relationship, a link, of which you are perhaps still unaware. The Evidence Profile of "pure energy" is defined as the energy source that sits at the pinnacle of the pecking order of all the different forms of energy. In other words "pure energy" is at the top and "entropy" is at the bottom, with matter, dark and baryonic, and the various energies needed for accomplishing work in the Cosmos - such as kinetic, thermal, and potential energy etc. landing somewhere in between. We must not be so naive as to fail to distinguish between empirical evidence and misapplied dynamics. When Intellectuals try to bend the facts to their metaphysical dreams, they always produce null results, as was the case with Maxwell corrupting the brilliant thesis of Faraday regarding how light traveled through Space without a medium. His proposed ether produced a null result. But such a result didn't mean light doesn't travel through empty Space. In the same way, cosmologists belief in the ether of negative gravity - so-called dark energy, has nothing to do with the value of the expansion force being 70%. That value does exist, and represents the cumulative force expended in the expansion of the universe, which indeed occurred. Calling a rose by another name doesn't remove its qualities. As such, the expansion force does exist. A consequence of that is that, if the expansion force is indeed verified empirically to be the greatest force in the universe, then it is also - by definition - the source of all matter: both dark and baryonic! According to their reckoning, physicists believe the universe developed with the following energy budget: Space expanding force - 70%; dark matter - 25%; Cosmos 5%. I learned in primary school that 70 > 20 > 5: giving the expansion force the Evidence Profile of "PURE ENERGY," and the simultaneous, related mantle of "source of all matter" - dark and baryonic! Time for some more conclusions:

CRITICAL DENSITY & REDSHIFT COMBINE TO PRODUCE THE NOVEL DISCOVERY THAT THE CENTER OF AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE REMAINS CONSTANT OVER TIME: IF IT WAS EMPTY AT INITIAL CONDITION, IT WILL BE EMPTY TODAY; IF IT IS OCCUPIED TODAY, IT WAS OCCUPIED BY THE SAME OBJECT(S) AT INITIAL CONDITION

ALL GALACTIC REDSHIFT TAKEN AS A PATTERN, TOGETHER WITH RADIAL EQUIDISTANCE TO THE MIGHTY CMB GIVES EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT THE EARTH IS AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE MINUS TECHNICAL HABITABLE ZONE CONSIDERATIONS

SINCE THE OBJECT AT THE CENTER OF THE CMB TODAY WOULD HAVE ESCAPED THE FORCES OF UNIVERSAL EXPANSION BY VIRTUE OF ITS CENTRAL POSITION, THEN WHATEVER IS AT THE CENTER OF THE CELESTIAL SPHERE TODAY WAS ALSO AT THE CENTER AT INITIAL CONDITION! FOR IF THE EARTH WAS IN ANYOTHER POSITION WHEN IT FIRST APPEARED, IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO OVERCOME THE GREATEST FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE TO ARRIVE AT ITS CURRENT CENTRAL LOCATION

THE EARTH IS THE OBJECT THAT WAS AT THE CENTER OF THE MIGHTY CMB AT INITIAL CONDITION

Let us now carefully list all of our accumulated conclusions, but as we do, we heed a word of caution:

Truer words have never been spoken. Immediately, upon embarking on collecting all 45 of our proofs into one complete list, we will realize that many of them are negative. That is, they prove why one or other aspect of the false origin stories is incorrect - why they are lies. Going forward, all such proofs will play no part in defining the correct theory of reality. We are not interested in what didn't happen, but in proving what did! As such, we must remove all superfluous proofs from our database of knowledge going forward - they have served their purpose. These are the ones we have highlighted with red lettering below:

SINCE KIRCHHOFF'S LAW FAILS THE BLACKBODY RADIATION TEST, IT IS FALSE, & ITS CONCLUSIONS ONLY APPLY TO ACTUAL BLACKBODIES. THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUE BLACKBODY IN THE UNIVERSE - THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND

KIRCHHOFF'S LAW IS FUNDAMENTAL TO THE BIG BANG THEORY & ITS SUPPOSED PRODUCTION OF THE MIGHTY CMB. SINCE KIRCHHOFF'S LAW HAS BEEN DEBUNKED, THE BIG BANG THEORY WHICH RESTED ON ITS VALIDITY IS ALSO FALSIFIED. FURTHER, WE MUST FIND AN ALTERNATE EXPLANATION FOR THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND

SINCE THE NATURAL CONSEQUENCE OF KIRCHHOFF'S LAW & THE BIG BANG BEING FALSIFIED ARE THAT ALL SUBSEQUENT THEORIES BASED ON THEM ARE ALSO WRONG, WE NOW APPRECIATE THAT THE SOLAR MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE IS FALSE. STARS ARE NOT GASEOUS AS WHITE LIGHT ONLY PRODUCES A CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM & CONTINUOUS SPECTRA HAVE ONLY EVER BEEN PRODUCED BY CONDENSED MATTER - SOLIDS OR LIQUIDS & NOT GASES

SINCE THE SOLAR MODEL FOR STAR FORMATION HAS BEEN FALSIFIED, THE TRUTH BEHIND THE ORIGIN & ENERGY SOURCE OF ALL THE STARS IN THE UNIVERSE ARE STILL TO BE IDENTIFIED

SINCE THE SOLAR MODEL FOR STAR FORMATION IS WRONG, WE REALIZE THAT THE PROPOSED BIG BANG LIFE CYCLE OF STARS IS WRONG & CANNOT BE THE SOURCE OF THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. THEREFORE, THE MECHANISM & ENERGY SOURCE FOR ALL THE MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE IS STILL TO BE IDENTIFIED

BLACKBODY RADIATION IS THE EXCLUSIVE PRESERVE OF STRUCTURES WITH A LATTICE. NO GASEOUS STRUCTURE ON EARTH HAS EVER BEEN SHOWN TO BE ABLE TO PRODUCE A CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM, LET ALONE BLACKBODY RADIATION. AS SUCH ANY CLAIMS TO THE CONTRARY ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE KNOWN LAWS OF PHYSICS

ON EARTH GRAPHITE, LAMP BLACK & SOOT CLOSELY APPROXIMATE BLACKBODY RADIATION & THEY ALL HAVE LATTICES. AS SUCH WHATEVER CREATED THE MIGHTY CMB MUST ALSO HAVE A LATTICE IN HARMONY WITH THE KNOWN LAWS OF PHYSICS, SINCE TO THE SAME EFFECTS, WE MUST AS FAR AS POSSIBLE ALWAYS ASSIGN THE SAME CAUSES

THERE IS NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT GASES CAN PRODUCE A CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM. ALL THE EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM THERMAL RADIATION & SPECTROSCOPY CONFIRMS THE OPPOSITE: ONLY CONDENSED MATTER PRODUCES CONTINUOUS SPECTRA; WHILE GASES PRODUCE BANDED SPECTRA

THE BIG BANG CANNOT SATISFY BASIC CHEMICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CREATION OF A BLACKBODY SPECTRUM - A CONDENSED MATTER LATTICE. THEREFORE THE HOT GASEOUS BIG BANG PLASMA IS NOT THE SOURCE OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND

THE ZEROTH LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS DEFINES TEMPERATURE AS AN INTENSIVE PROPERTY. ANY PROCESS THAT DEFINES IT AS AN EXTENSIVE PROPERTY IS THUS A VIOLATION OF PHYSICS & AMOUNTS TO METAPHYSICAL SPECULATION - NOT REALITY

GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE IS FALSE BECAUSE IT INVOKES A CLOSED SYSTEM WHICH CAN INCREASE ITS OWN TEMPERATURE. BUT TEMPERATURE IS A MEASUREMENT OF INTERNAL ENERGY, MEANING A SPONTANEOUS INCREASE IN TEMPERATURE IS AN INCREASE IN ENERGY, WHICH VIOLATES THE 1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS: ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED!

THE ENTROPY OF ANY CLOSED SYSTEM CAN ONLY INCREASE. A GAS CLOUD IN OUTER SPACE IS JUST SUCH A CLOSED SYSTEM & CAN THUS NOT UNDERGO GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE - A PROCESS THAT WOULD DECREASE ITS ENTROPY - NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME PASSES

TEMPERATURE IS A MEASURE OF THE INTERNAL ENERGY OF A SYSTEM. A COLLAPSING CLOSED SYSTEM OF GAS THAT RAISES ITS TEMPERATURE IN THE PROCESS IS A VIOLATION OF THE 1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS WHICH PROHIBITS THE CREATION OF ENERGY

IT REQUIRES WORK TO CONVERT ONE FORM OF ENERGY INTO ANOTHER. SUCH WORK CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT A HEAT SINK. GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE OF A GAS CLOUD DOES NOT EMIT PHOTONS & THUS VIOLATES THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

THE FOUNDATIONS OF YOUR WORLDVIEW DETERMINE THE CHOICES YOU MAKE - EITHER FOR GOOD, OR FOR BAD - & THEIR IMMINENT CONSEQUENCES

THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS ACTUAL INFINITIES. A FINITE NUMBER OF OPERATIONS CANNOT BE APPLIED TO EFFECTIVELY REDUCE INFINITE PROPERTIES

EITHER THE CURRENT THEORY OF PHYSICS WITH ITS METAPHYSICAL CONCEPTS OF ACTUAL INFINITIES IS WRONG, OR PHYSICAL EXISTENCE IS WRONG. BUT SINCE YOU & I EXIST - IT IS THE PHYSICAL THEORY WHICH IS WRONG

THE BIG BANG'S METAPHYSICAL THEORY OF GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE HAS NO PRESSURE MECHANISM TO CONTAIN THE GAS PARTICLES - A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ATTENDANT INCREASE IN PRESSURE WHICH WOULD ACCOMPANY A DECREASE IN THE VOLUME OF A COLLAPSING GAS CLOUD

THE LAWS OF NATURE DO NOT CHANGE OVER TIME. SINCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME DOES NOT CHANGE THE LAWS OF NATURE - THE SAME RESULTS OCCUR - NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME HAS PASSED

THE SECOND PILLAR OF THE THEORY OF GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE - THAT ISOLATED GAS SYSTEMS HAVE POTENTIAL GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY IS ALSO FALSE. AN ISOLATED GAS CLOUD IS DEFINED AS A SINGLE SYSTEM. "A SINGLE OBJECT BY ITSELF CANNOT HAVE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ENERGY!"

GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE CONTRADICTS THE KNOWN LAWS OF PHYSICS. IT IS A METAPHYSICAL SPECULATION THAT IS PROVEN TO BE FALSE BY KNOWN SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION, ANALYSIS & EXPERIMENT

THE MIGHTY CMB IS NOT RELIC BLACKBODY RADIATION. IT IS A CONDENSED MATTER BLACKBODY THAT CONTINUALLY PRODUCES A PERFECT BLACKBODY SPECTRUM - THE ONLY ONE IN THE UNIVERSE

THE EXISTENCE OF BOTH NEAR PERFECT REFLECTORS & GREYBODIES PROVES THAT KIRCHHOFF'S LAW IS FALSE

THE UNIVERSE HAS BEEN AT CONSTANT CRITICAL DENSITY FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND TO THE PRESENT. BUT, THE VOLUME OF SPACE HAS GROWN IN THAT TIME - HENCE, THE MASS OF MATTER MUST ALSO HAVE GROWN - WITH IT - IN THAT TIME

CRITICAL DENSITY & REDSHIFT COMBINE TO PRODUCE THE NOVEL DISCOVERY THAT THE CENTER OF AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE REMAINS CONSTANT OVER TIME: IF IT WAS EMPTY AT INITIAL CONDITION, IT WILL BE EMPTY TODAY; IF IT IS OCCUPIED TODAY, IT WAS OCCUPIED BY THE SAME OBJECT(S) AT INITIAL CONDITION

ALL GALACTIC REDSHIFT TAKEN AS A PATTERN, TOGETHER WITH RADIAL EQUIDISTANCE TO THE MIGHTY CMB GIVES EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT THE EARTH IS AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE MINUS TECHNICAL HABITABLE ZONE CONSIDERATIONS

SINCE THE OBJECT AT THE CENTER OF THE CMB TODAY WOULD HAVE ESCAPED THE FORCES OF UNIVERSAL EXPANSION BY VIRTUE OF ITS CENTRAL POSITION, THEN WHATEVER IS AT THE CENTER OF THE CELESTIAL SPHERE TODAY WAS ALSO AT THE CENTER AT INITIAL CONDITION! FOR IF THE EARTH WAS IN ANYOTHER POSITION WHEN IT FIRST APPEARED, IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO OVERCOME THE GREATEST FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE TO ARRIVE AT ITS CURRENT CENTRAL LOCATION

THE ONLY ARRANGEMENT OF OBJECTS THAT SATISFIES BOTH THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND AT "INITIAL CONDITION" & THE INHOMOGENEITY OF THE UNIVERSE AS IT IS TODAY RULES OUT MULTIPLE OBJECTS & DICTATES THAT AT INITIAL CONDITION THERE WAS ONE OBJECT - OF PROBABLE SPHERICAL SHAPE AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE AT "INITIAL CONDITION"

THE EARTH IS THE OBJECT THAT WAS AT THE CENTER OF THE MIGHTY CMB AT INITIAL CONDITION

SINCE THE MIGHTY CMB ABSORBS ALL FREQUENCIES OF LIGHT & PRODUCES A PERFECT SPECTRUM, AND SINCE IT WAS PRESENT FROM "INITIAL CONDITION" ONWARD, THERE IS NO FACET OF THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE WHICH IS HIDDEN FROM ITS DATABASE!

RADIATION AND MATTER FORMED INDEPENDENTLY OF EACH OTHER. MATTER EXISTED BEFORE RADIATION

SINCE RADIATION IN THE FORM OF "PHOTON ENERGY," CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF DARK MATTER & THE TULLY-FISHER RELATION SHOWS THAT DARK MATTER AND BARYONIC MATTER MUST HAVE THE SAME SOURCE - THAT SOURCE CANNOT BE "PHOTONS!"

SINCE RADIATION CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR THE SUPERIOR FORM OF MATTER CALLED DARK MATTER, IT IS NOT THE HIGHEST FORM OF ENERGY - THE "PURE ENERGY" FROM WHICH ALL MATTER IS MADE.

THE LOGICAL ORDER OF THE APPEARANCE OF THE 3 ENTITIES THAT EXISTED AT THE ADVENT OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ARE: 1) SPACE; 2) MATTER &; 3) RADIATION

THE BARYONIC BASED ELECTROMAGNETIC COSMOS ARE "PHYSICAL" IN NATURE, WHILE THE NON-BARYONIC BASED, NON-ELECTROMAGNETIC DARK MATTER REALM IS "NON-PHYSICAL"

NATURE: IS THE UNIVERSE'S ELECTROMAGNETIC REALM OR "ORDER OF EXISTENCE" & IS DEFINED BY THE PROPERTIES OF BEING PHYSICAL AND VISIBLE (THAT IS INTERACTING WITH LIGHT)

SUPERNATURE: IS THE UNIVERSE'S NON-ELECTROMAGNETIC REALM OR "ORDER OF EXISTENCE" & IS DEFINED BY THE PROPERTIES OF BEING NON-PHYSICAL AND INVISIBLE (THAT IS NOT INTERACTING WITH LIGHT)

THE RADIATION CONTENT OF THE UNIVERSE ONLY STARTED WITH THE ADVENT OF THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND. THIS RADIATION WAS NOT PRODUCED BY EITHER THE IMPOSSIBLE COOLING OF INFINITE TEMPERATURES, NOR BY THE EQUALLY IMPOSSIBLE & SELF CONTRADICTORY RECOMBINATION IN A FLUCTUATING THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM

SINCE THE STARS & GALAXIES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTS OF THE SAME PROCESS THAT PRODUCED THE MIGHTY CMB, THIS MEANS STARS ARE ALSO NOT THE PRODUCTS OF A COOLING HOT BARYONIC "PHOTON" SOUP

SINCE EVERYTHING WE KNOW EMPIRICALLY ABOUT THE UNIVERSE WE HAVE LEARNED THROUGH LIGHT, THE EARLIEST EMPIRICALLY KNOWABLE POINT IN THE UNIVERSE IS DICTATED BY THE FIRST INSTANCE OF LIGHT - FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE MIGHTY CMB ONWARDS

AT THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF THE MIGHTY CMB - THE UNIVERSE CONTAINED 3 ENTITIES: SPACE, MATTER, AND RADIATION IN A "SPECIAL STATE" OF BOTH PERFECT THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM AND ZERO ENTROPY

THIS RATHER "SPECIAL STATE" INFORMS US THAT ALL THREE ENTITIES: SPACE, MATTER, AND RADIATION PRESENT AT THAT POINT DID NOT ORIGINATE FROM EITHER BARYONIC MEANS OR EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES

SINCE, MATTER IS A FORM OF ENERGY, & THE ENERGY SOURCE FOR DARK & THEREFORE BARYONIC MATTER IS NOT BARYONIC - THE "PURE ENERGY" THAT IS THE SOURCE OF ALL MATTER MUST BELONG TO THE DARK MATTER REALM

THE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND OCCURRED AFTER & NOT BEFORE, OR DURING ITS APPEARANCE

Below we have a list that consolidates only the relevant positive proofs that constitute the correct and only true Theory of Everything! Consolidating them also means trimming all the fat off of them, by refining our wording to remove any obvious duplication of proofs as found in different pieces of evidence. In some instances, we will also move the proofs up or down the list. Whereas in the above list they are presented more or less in their order of appearance; below they will be grouped together with others that they fit with, most naturally. This will have the effect of making our database as compact as possible - making it easier to recall, understand and retain. Our updated list is found below:

ON EARTH GRAPHITE, LAMP BLACK & SOOT CLOSELY APPROXIMATE BLACKBODY RADIATION & THEY ALL HAVE LATTICES. AS SUCH WHATEVER CREATED THE MIGHTY CMB MUST ALSO HAVE A LATTICE IN HARMONY WITH THE KNOWN LAWS OF PHYSICS, SINCE TO THE SAME EFFECTS, WE MUST AS FAR AS POSSIBLE ALWAYS ASSIGN THE SAME CAUSES

THE FOUNDATIONS OF YOUR WORLDVIEW DETERMINE THE CHOICES YOU MAKE - EITHER FOR GOOD, OR FOR BAD - & THEIR IMMINENT CONSEQUENCES

THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS ACTUAL INFINITIES. A FINITE NUMBER OF OPERATIONS CANNOT BE APPLIED TO EFFECTIVELY REDUCE INFINITE PROPERTIES

EITHER THE CURRENT THEORY OF PHYSICS WITH ITS METAPHYSICAL CONCEPTS OF ACTUAL INFINITIES IS WRONG, OR PHYSICAL EXISTENCE IS WRONG. BUT SINCE YOU & I EXIST - IT IS THE PHYSICAL THEORY WHICH IS WRONG

THE MIGHTY CMB IS NOT RELIC BLACKBODY RADIATION. IT IS A CONDENSED MATTER BLACKBODY THAT CONTINUALLY PRODUCES A PERFECT BLACKBODY SPECTRUM - THE ONLY ONE IN THE UNIVERSE

THE ONLY ARRANGEMENT OF OBJECTS THAT SATISFIES BOTH THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND AT "INITIAL CONDITION" & THE INHOMOGENEITY OF THE UNIVERSE AS IT IS TODAY RULES OUT MULTIPLE OBJECTS & DICTATES THAT AT "INITIAL CONDITION" THERE WAS ONE OBJECT - OF PROBABLE SPHERICAL SHAPE AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE

THE UNIVERSE HAS BEEN AT CONSTANT CRITICAL DENSITY FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND TO THE PRESENT. BUT, THE VOLUME OF SPACE HAS GROWN IN THAT TIME - HENCE, THE MASS OF MATTER MUST ALSO HAVE GROWN - WITH IT - IN THAT TIME

CRITICAL DENSITY & REDSHIFT COMBINE TO PRODUCE THE NOVEL DISCOVERY THAT THE CENTER OF AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE REMAINS CONSTANT OVER TIME: IF IT WAS EMPTY AT INITIAL CONDITION, IT WILL BE EMPTY TODAY; IF IT IS OCCUPIED TODAY, IT WAS OCCUPIED BY THE SAME OBJECT(S) AT INITIAL CONDITION

ALL GALACTIC REDSHIFT TAKEN AS A PATTERN, TOGETHER WITH RADIAL EQUIDISTANCE TO THE MIGHTY CMB GIVES EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT THE EARTH IS AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE MINUS TECHNICAL HABITABLE ZONE CONSIDERATIONS

SINCE THE OBJECT AT THE CENTER OF THE CMB TODAY WOULD HAVE ESCAPED THE FORCES OF UNIVERSAL EXPANSION BY VIRTUE OF ITS CENTRAL POSITION, THEN WHATEVER IS AT THE CENTER OF THE CELESTIAL SPHERE TODAY WAS ALSO AT THE CENTER AT INITIAL CONDITION! THAT OBJECT IS THE EARTH, FOR IF THE EARTH WAS IN ANYOTHER POSITION WHEN IT FIRST APPEARED, IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO OVERCOME THE GREATEST FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE TO ARRIVE AT ITS CURRENT UNIVERSALLY CENTRAL LOCATION

THE EARTH IS THE OBJECT THAT WAS AT THE CENTER OF THE MIGHTY CMB AT INITIAL CONDITION - CONFIRMING THE DETAILS OF ONE SPHERICAL OBJECT BEING AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE AT INITIAL CONDITION!

LAWS 9 & 10 SHOW THAT THE CRITICAL DENSITY AT INITIAL CONDITIONS, THAT IS THE RATIO BETWEEN SPACE & OBJECTS WAS CONSTANT. THIS MEANS THE OBJECT WAS COMPLETE MATERIALLY, THOUGH NOT IN ITS FINAL FORM, FOR THAT OBJECT - THE EARTH - IS NO LONGER COVERED IN WATER

WE LEARNT ON PAGE 22 - THAT DEALT WITH THE CONSTITUTION & DYNAMICS OF DARK MATTER - THAT THE DYNAMICS OF SPACE PROVE IT IS A ONE-PIECE STRUCTURE THAT STRETCHES BUT DOES NOT EXPAND. THIS MEANS AT INITIAL CONDITIONS SPACE WAS ALSO COMPLETE, THOUGH NOT IN ITS FINAL FORM

FROM THE LAST TWO LAWS WE CONCLUDE THAT BOTH SPACE AND MATTER AT INITIAL CONDITION WERE COMPLETE, THOUGH NOT IN THEIR FINAL FORM. SPACE BECAUSE IT WAS STRETCHED THEREAFTER TO ITS CURRENT SIZE & THE EARTH BECAUSE WATER NO LONGER COVERS ITS ENTIRE SURFACE

RADIATION AND MATTER FORMED INDEPENDENTLY OF EACH OTHER. MATTER - IN THE FORM OF THE EARTH - EXISTED BEFORE RADIATION!

SINCE THE EARTH PRECEDED RADIATION - THE APPEARANCE OF THE EARTH AT INITIAL CONDITION WAS UNDER CONDITIONS OF DARKNESS!

IF MATTER WAS IN SOLID FORM, THEN ONE ELEMENT IS THE MINIMUM CHEMICAL REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, IF THE SURFACE OF MATTER WAS IN THE LIQUID PHASE, THEN, AT LEAST 2 DIFFERENT ELEMENTS HAD TO BE PRESENT, AS LIQUIDS DO NOT HAVE A DEFINITE SHAPE

THE LAST TWO PROOFS COMBINE TO GIVE US THE FACT THAT SINCE THE EARTH WAS THE ORIGINAL OBJECT AT INITIAL CONDITION, ITS SURFACE WAS ALL IN LIQUID FORM, I.E., NO ICE CAPS. THIS MEANS EARTH - WITH ITS SOLID NON H20 CENTER - WAS COVERED IN WATER WITH NO VISIBLE LAND, UNDER DARKNESS, AT INITIAL CONDITIONS

A CONSEQUENCE OF THE LAST POINT IS THAT IT ALLOWS US TO DETERMINE THE RANGE OF TEMPERATURES THE MIGHTY CMB FELL WITHIN AT ITS ADVENT, SINCE THE FORM OF MATTER IT WAS IN THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM WITH WAS LIQUID WATER - WHICH HAS A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 100 DEGREES CELSIUS AT 1 ATMOSPHERE

SINCE THE MIGHTY CMB ABSORBS ALL FREQUENCIES OF LIGHT & PRODUCES A PERFECT SPECTRUM, AND SINCE IT WAS PRESENT FROM "INITIAL CONDITION" ONWARD, THERE IS NO FACET OF THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE WHICH IS HIDDEN FROM ITS DATABASE!

SINCE RADIATION CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR THE SUPERIOR FORM OF MATTER CALLED DARK MATTER, IT IS NOT THE HIGHEST FORM OF ENERGY - THE "PURE ENERGY" FROM WHICH ALL MATTER IS MADE.

THE LOGICAL ORDER OF THE APPEARANCE OF THE 3 ENTITIES THAT EXISTED AT THE ADVENT OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ARE: 1) SPACE; 2) MATTER &; 3) RADIATION

THE BARYONIC BASED ELECTROMAGNETIC COSMOS ARE "PHYSICAL" IN NATURE, WHILE THE NON-BARYONIC BASED, NON-ELECTROMAGNETIC DARK MATTER REALM IS "NON-PHYSICAL"

NATURE: IS THE UNIVERSE'S ELECTROMAGNETIC REALM OR "ORDER OF EXISTENCE" & IS DEFINED BY THE PROPERTIES OF BEING PHYSICAL AND VISIBLE (THAT IS INTERACTING WITH LIGHT)

SUPERNATURE: IS THE UNIVERSE'S NON-ELECTROMAGNETIC REALM OR "ORDER OF EXISTENCE" & IS DEFINED BY THE PROPERTIES OF BEING NON-PHYSICAL AND INVISIBLE (THAT IS NOT INTERACTING WITH LIGHT) TOGETHER THESE TWO "ORDERS OF EXISTENCE" MAKE UP THE 2 REALMS OF THE UNIVERSE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY OTHER REALMS IN THE UNIVERSE & ALL PHENOMENA CAN BE EXPLAINED THROUGH THESE 2 REALMS

LAWS 23 AND 24 MEAN THAT BECAUSE NATURE IS BASED ON ELECTROMAGNETISM IT IS SUBJECT TO ENTROPY. ENTROPY IS ANOTHER NAME FOR WEAR & TEAR, THUS NO PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE IS POSSIBLE IN THE NATURAL WORLD - NATURE IS THUS TEMPORAL

LAWS 23 AND 24 MEAN THAT BECAUSE SUPERNATURE IS NOT BASED ELECTROMAGNETISM IT IS FREE FROM THE EFFECTS OF ENTROPY. THUS ALL FORMS OF DARK MATTER ARE NON-DECAYING PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES - ETERNAL

THE RADIATION CONTENT OF THE UNIVERSE ONLY STARTED WITH THE ADVENT OF THE MIGHTY COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND. THIS RADIATION WAS NOT PRODUCED BY EITHER THE IMPOSSIBLE COOLING OF INFINITE TEMPERATURES, NOR BY THE EQUALLY IMPOSSIBLE & SELF CONTRADICTORY RECOMBINATION IN A FLUCTUATING THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM

SINCE EVERYTHING WE KNOW EMPIRICALLY ABOUT THE UNIVERSE WE HAVE LEARNED THROUGH LIGHT, THE EARLIEST EMPIRICALLY KNOWABLE POINT IN THE UNIVERSE IS DICTATED BY THE FIRST INSTANCE OF LIGHT - FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE MIGHTY CMB ONWARDS

AT THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF THE MIGHTY CMB - THE UNIVERSE CONTAINED 3 ENTITIES: SPACE, MATTER, AND RADIATION IN A "SPECIAL STATE" OF BOTH PERFECT THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM AND ZERO ENTROPY

THIS RATHER "SPECIAL STATE" INFORMS US THAT ALL THREE ENTITIES: SPACE, MATTER, AND RADIATION PRESENT AT THAT POINT DID NOT ORIGINATE FROM EITHER BARYONIC MEANS OR EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES

SINCE, MATTER IS A FORM OF ENERGY, & THE ENERGY SOURCE FOR DARK & THEREFORE BARYONIC MATTER IS NOT BARYONIC - THE "PURE ENERGY" THAT IS THE SOURCE OF ALL MATTER MUST BELONG TO THE DARK MATTER REALM

IT REQUIRES WORK TO CONVERT ONE FORM OF ENERGY INTO ANOTHER. SUCH WORK CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT A HEAT SINK. GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE OF A GAS CLOUD DOES NOT EMIT PHOTONS & THUS VIOLATES THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

FROM CONCLUSIONS 27, 28, & 29 WE COME TO UNDERSTAND THAT IN THE DARK MATTER REALM WORK DOES NOT GENERATE ENTROPY SINCE NO HEAT OR ATOMS ARE INVOLVED

THE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND OCCURRED AFTER & NOT BEFORE, OR DURING ITS APPEARANCE

THE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE OF THE EARLY UNIVERSE, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND, THE THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM TEMPERATURE BETWEEN MATTER & RADIATION, WAS LOW ENOUGH FOR THE OBJECT(S) OCCUPYING SPACE TO BE IN EITHER A LIQUID OR SOLID STATE - BUT NOT A GASEOUS ONE

AT THE TIME OF THE APPEARANCE OF THE MIGHTY CMB, THE MATTER CONTENT OF THE UNIVERSE - WHICH PRECEDED LIGHT - WAS IN THE FORM OF ONE OR MORE OBJECTS, NOT ATOMS!

SINCE LIGHT FIRST APPEARED INTO A CLASSICAL UNIVERSE OF SPACE & ONE OR MORE OBJECTS, THE QUANTUM CONDITIONS THAT DICTATE THE NEED FOR QUANTUM GRAVITY, NEVER EXISTED!

WITHIN THE LAWS OF NATURE OR PHYSICS, THERE MUST BE AN EVIDENCE PROFILE THROUGH WHICH HONEST HEARTED HUMANS CAN DETERMINE IF THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE WAS THROUGH A NATURAL ENTROPY-BASED "MECHANISM," OR A SUPERNATURAL ENTROPY-FREE "MECHANISM"

THE MIGHTY CMB PROVIDES EVIDENCE THAT THE INITIAL CONDITIONS FOR THE UNIVERSE WERE AT ZERO ENTROPY IN 3 IMPORTANT WAYS: GEOMETRY, MATTER, & RADIATION CONTENT

THE ZERO ENTROPY STATE OF THE INITIAL CONDITIONS IS POSSIBLE ONLY IF INSERTED INTO THE COSMOS, FROM THE NON-BARYONIC SECOND REALM OF THE UNIVERSE - THE DARK MATTER REALM. SUCH ZERO ENTROPY INITIAL CONDITIONS ARE ONLY POSSIBLE THROUGH "FIAT," NOT ANY HEAT-BASED BARYONIC MATTER OR EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES

CREATING THE INITIAL CONDITIONS VIA FIAT REQUIRES 3 VARIABLES THAT ARE ALL EXTERNAL TO THE COSMOS: A DARK MATTER ENERGY SOURCE; A DARK MATTER PISTON; & FOR THE DARK MATTER REALM TO BE IN AN OPEN SYSTEM WITH THE COSMOS, ALLOWING THE MATTER & ENERGY THAT ORIGINATED IN THE SUPERNATURAL DARK MATTER ORDER OF EXISTENCE TO CROSS INTO THE VISIBLE REALM

THE 2 ORDERS OF EXISTENCE OF THE UNIVERSE ARE NOT 2 SEPARATE & INDEPENDENT REALMS. THEY ARE UNITED & COMPLIMENTARY REALMS THAT TOGETHER FORM THE UNIVERSE & ARE CONNECTED THROUGH A TOP-DOWN OPEN SYSTEM

THE GREATEST FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE CAN BE CALCULATED EMPIRICALLY. THAT FORCE WOULD DEFINE THE EVIDENCE PROFILE OF "PURE ENERGY." "PURE ENERGY" IS THE SOURCE OF ALL MATTER - DARK & BARYONIC THROUGH THE TULLY-FISHER RELATION. THE EXPANSION FORCE OF THE UNIVERSE IS EMPIRICALLY THE GREATEST FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE & THUS FITS THE EVIDENCE PROFILE OF "PURE ENERGY." THIS ALSO MAKES IT THE SOURCE OF ALL MATTER

With the abundance of evidence-based conclusions we have at hand, we have managed to compile a very detailed and constricted model of the genesis and development of the universe. Any theory we compare to our list - our map for treasure hunting - will have to meet all of the factors in order to be proven as the mechanism that brought the universe in to being:

The Spidey sense of anyone with an even casual acquaintance with the Bible should be ringing already, as they would have already, started to recognize, many of the features of the Genesis account in our empirically derived conclusions. What may surprise you is that the evidence backed scientific theory that the Earth was the original object in the universe is not original to me. It was suggested almost 100 years ago! That is why all the false priests of Scientism who have come afterwards are liable for their deviation from strict adherence to the scientific method

Do you recall that in an earlier chapter I highlighted the comment of someone with the handle discord73 on the PhysicsForums forum? They asked the question:

Discord73, by using his mind and applying critical thinking has manages to outclass all the cosmologists who continue to misinterpret the evidence that is starring them in the face. Proper interpretation of Evidence Profiles is the skill more than any other which distinguishes the wheat from the chaff in the scientific context. Otherwise you are nothing but the discoverer of dephlogisticated air!

Now you know why there is such a dearth of genuine scientific progress, a stalemate of innovation. Intellectuals are too busy dreaming up metaphysical fantasies to have the slightest clue as to how to move their chosen fields of study forward. Empty Intellectuals like Saul Perlmutter have amateur cosmologists like "discord73" running circles around them. Perlmutter, is the genius, you will remember, who, as one of the three stooges - along with Adam Riess and Brian P Schmidt - won the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics for "discovering" the non-existent dark energy! These geniuses could not accomplish the simple task of reading correctly the data from universal redshifts that shows that the farthest parts of the universe are moving away from the Earth at the fastest rate! And, that as you get closer to Earth, the rate of expansion gets slower and slower. As discord correctly surmised: since "the farther a galaxy is from us the further back in time we are seeing it, does that no mean the universe is expanding slower now in the present and was expanding faster in the past?" The disdain I have for God-hating Intellectuals cannot be distilled! It's not hatred. I would have to value them in some way to summon such emotions. It's just utter contempt. You can't tell the forest from the trees, but you deign to acknowledge the glory of the only living God. Here is Moe Perlmutter giving his cart in front of the horse two cents on what the data means:

There are no words. I lie. The utter empty-headed foolishness is unsurpassable. What makes the offense even more egregious is that is more than just unabashed foolishness, it is willing ignorance. Like the corruption of Clausius' work, like the mangling of Stewart's Law, Like the debasement of Faraday's accomplishments - in that very same way - Perlmutter's premise is an apostasy from the conclusion reached roughly 7 decades prior, as I referred to earlier. Perlmutter, Riess and Schmidt came to their preposterous conclusion despite the fact that a theory which fit all the known facts had already been proposed. They, and effectively three generations of scientists chose to ignore the original pioneering conclusion. Who was the great pioneer who had "the intelligence to interpret the results" correctly? Edwin Powell Hubble! That's correct: right at the very beginning of the field of Astrophysics Hubble gave the correct understanding of what the data was telling mankind. Following is a summary of his conclusions:

The Universe is COMPLETE!

Critical Density and Redshift also combine to resolve another puzzle: is the universe still expanding today? Since, we have already established what the meaning behind the oldest galaxies - the ones that are farthest away - having the greatest recessional velocity away from us means. We realize that the only correct conclusion to draw is that the "stretching" of Space, as Steinhardt put it, has dad three phases. At Initial Condition: Space was not expanding as the was only one object in the universe - the Earth, and it was at a certain ratio with the then available volume of Space. But Space went through a second period in its history - where it was stretched. Throughout the stretching of Space: its volume grew. This growth is captured for us in Galactic Redshifts. That data tell us the galaxies farthest away from us moved at the fastest pace. Each successive appearance of matter - and hence additional stretching of Space - was then added to the INSIDE of that already stretched horizon not its exterior! What did that mean? It formed a non-negotiable demarcation line for both the existence of matter and the expansion of Space. It gives us an "arena," the parameters where the stretching of Space took place. It means there is no Stretching of Space outside that horizon, because there is no matter being added outside that horizon. But it also tells us that: THE STRETCHING OF SPACE HAD A BEGINNING AND AN END! We know that because the range of the stretching of Space is effectively from the earliest stars back to us! It is not, from us outward! That nuance of detail is so ingenious, it is bewildering! For, that reason as Hubble concluded, Space started stretching, but slowed until it stretched no more. In other words, the universe is complete! We state the fact as a conclusion:

SPACE HAD 3 PHASES IN ITS STRETCHING: STATIC; FAST TO SLOW STRETCHING; & STATIC. THIS MEANS THE UNIVERSE IS OF A FINITE STABLE SIZE, & THE AMOUNT OF MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE IS CONSTANT GOING FORWARD - WHICH MAINTAINS PERFECT RATIO

Through these fact based conclusions, we now have a COMPLETE ROAD MAP to a treasure hunt! Now. We. Hunt!